The Mental Timeline During the Processing of Linguistic Information
There is ample evidence that people use spatial concepts to think and speak
about time. Consistent with this notion, recent reaction time experiments
have documented that the spatial coordinates of responses influence speeded
decisions regarding temporal information. Specifically, classifying temporal linguistic
information produces a space-time congruency effect on reaction time
when responses with the left and right hand are arranged on the left-right axis.
A similar effect can be observed for responses that consist of movements along
the back-front axis. These findings are consistent with the view that time runs
from left to right or from back to front. In the present article we review these
results and assess the linguistic relevance of these two mental timelines for the
comprehension of linguistic information at the word and sentence level.
References (74)
References
Balota, D.A., et al. 2006. Visual Word Recognition: The Journey from Features to Meaning (a Travel Update). In M.J. Traxler & M.A. Gernsbacher (eds.) Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Elsevier. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barsalou, L.W. 2008. Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59, 617–645. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bender, A., & Beller, S. 2014. Mapping Spatial Frames of Reference onto Time: a Review of Theoretical Accounts and Empirical findings. Cognition 132, 342–382. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bergen, B.K., & Chan Lau, T.T. 2012. Writing Direction Affects how People Map Space onto Time. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 109. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boroditsky, L. 2000. Metaphoric Structuring: Understanding Time through Spatial Metaphors. Cognition 75, 1–28. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boroditsky, L. 2001. Does Language Shape Thought? Mandarin and English Speakers’ Conceptions of Time. Cognitive Psychology 43, 1–22. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boroditsky, L. et al. 2011. Do English and Mandarin Speakers Think about Time Differently? Cognition 118, 123–129. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burr, D. et al. 2007. Neural Mechanisms for Timing Visual Events are Spatially Selective in Real-world Coordinates. Nature Neuroscience 10, 423–425.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Casasanto, D. 2009. Embodiment of Abstract Concepts: Good and Bad in Right- and Left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138, 351–367. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. 2008. Time in the Mind: Using Space to Think about Time. Cognition 106, 579–593. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Casasanto, D., & Bottini, R. 2014. Mirror Reading can Reverse the Flow of Time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143, 437–479. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Casasanto, D. et al. 2010. Space and Time in the Child’s Mind: Evidence for a Cross-dimensional Asymmetry. Cognitive Science 34, 387–405. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, H.H. 1973. Space, Time, and the Child. In T.E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corallo, G. et al. 2008. Limits on Introspection: Distorted Subjective Time During the Dual-Task Bottleneck. Psychological Science 19, 1110–1117. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Groot, A.M.B. et al. 1986. Primed-lexical Decision: the Effect of Varying the Stimulus-onset Asynchrony of Prime and Target. Acta Psychologica 61, 17–36. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dehaene, S. et al. 1993. The Mental Representation of Parity and Number Magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122, 371–396. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de la Fuente, J. et al. 2014. When you Think about It, your Past is in front of You: how Culture Shapes Spatial Conceptions of Time. Psychological Science 25, 1682–1690. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Sousa, H. 2012. Generational Differences in the Orientation of Time in Cantonese Speakers as a Function of Changes in the Direction of Chinese Writing. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 255. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eikmeier, V. et al. 2013. Dimensional Overlap Between Time and Space. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 20, 1120–1125. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eikmeier, V., & Ulrich, R. 2012a. The Influence of Spatial Priming on Processing of Time-related Words. Paper presented at the 54. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Mannheim, Germany.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eikmeier, V., & Ulrich, R. 2012b. Priming the Mental Timeline: do Spatial Primes Influence the Processing of Time-related Words? Paper presented at Time and Temporality in Language and Human Experience (TimeLing), Łódź, Poland.
Emmorey, K. 2001. Space on Hand: the Exploitation of Signing Space to Illustrate Abstract Thought. In M. Gattis (ed.), Spatial Schemas and Abstract Thought (pp. 147–174). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fiedler, K. 2011. Voodoo Correlations are Everywhere – Not Only in Neuroscience. Perspectives on Psychological Science 6, 163–171. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fraser, T.J. (ed.). 1966. The Voices of Time: A Cooperative Survey of the Man’s View of Time as Expressed by the Sciences and the Humanities. New York: George Braziller.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fuhrman, O., & Boroditsky, L. 2010. Cross-cultural Differences in Mental Representations of Time: Evidence from an Implicit Nonlinguistic Task. Cognitive Science 34, 1430–1451. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fuhrman, O. et al. 2011. How Linguistic and Cultural Forces Shape Conceptions of Time: English and Mandarin Time in 3D. Cognitive Science 35, 1305–1328. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gentner, D. et al. 2002. As Times Goes by: Evidence for Two Systems in Processing Space – Time Metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes 17, 537–565. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glenberg, A.M., & Kaschak, M.P. 2002. Grounding Language in Action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9, 558–565. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Graf, E.M. 2006. The Ontogenetic Development of Literal and Metaphorical Space in Language. Tübingen: Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grondin, S. 2001. From Physical Time to the First and Second Moments of Psychological Time. Psychological Bulletin 127, 22–44. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hartmann, M., & Mast, F.W. 2012. Moving Along the Mental Time Line Influences the Processing of Future Related Words. Consciousness and Cognition 21, 1558–1562. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, M. 1997. From Space to Time: Temporal Advervials in the World’s Languages. München: Lincom Europa.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, W. 2009. Concepts of Time. In W. Klein & P. Li (eds.), The Expression of Time (pp. 5–38). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kong, F., & You, X. 2012. Space-time Compatibility Effects in the Auditory Modality. Experimental Psychology 59, 82–87. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lachmair, M. et al. 2011. Root versus Roof: Automatic Activation of Location Information During Word Processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 18, 1180–1188. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakens, D. et al. 2011. The Sound of Time: Cross-modal Convergence in the Spatial Structuring of Time. Consciousness and Cognition 20, 437–443. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Libet, B. 2004. Mind Time: the Temporal Factor in Consciousness. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Havard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mandler, G. 1992. Toward a Theory of Consciousness. In G. Hans-Georg, et al. (eds.), Cognition, Information Processing, and Psychophysics: Basic Pssues (pp. 43–65). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawerence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGlone, M.S., & Harding, J.L. 1998. Back (or Forward?) to the Future: The Role of Perspective in Temporal Language Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 24, 1211–1223. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miles, L.K. et al. 2010. Moving Through Time. Psychological Science 21, 222–223. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Núñez, R., & Cooperrider, K. 2013. The Tangle of Space and Time in Human Cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17, 220–229. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Núñez, R.E., & Sweetser, E. 2006. With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence from Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time. Cognitive Science 30, 401–450. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ouellet, M. et al. 2012. A Multisensory Interaction Effect in the Conceptual Realm of Time. Experimental Psychology 59, 236–242. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ouellet, M. et al. 2010. Thinking about the Future Moves Attention to the Right. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 36, 17–24. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ouellet, M. et al. 2010. Is the Future the Right Time? Experimental Psycholology 57, 308–314. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pashler, H., & Harris, C.R. 2012. Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7, 531–536. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G. 2004. The Metaphor TIME AS SPACE Across Languages. In N. Baumgarten, et al. (eds.), Interkulturelle Kommunikation, Spracherwerb und Sprachvermittlung – das Leben mit mehreren Sprachen: Festschrift für Juliane House zum 60. Geburtstag (pp. 225–239). Bochum: Aks-Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Raposo, A. et al. 2009. Modulation of Motor and Premotor Cortices by Actions, Action Words and Action Sentences. Neuropsychologia 47, 388–396. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richards, M.M., & Hawpe, L.S. 1981. Contrasting Patterns in the Acquisition of Spatial/temporal Terms. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 32, 485–512. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rolke, B. et al. 2013. Priming the Mental Time-line: Effects of Modality and Processing Mode. Cognitive Processing 14, 231–244. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosenthal, R. 1979. The File Drawer Problem and Tolerance for Null Results. Psychological Bulletin 86, 638–641. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Santiago, J. et al. 2007. Time (also) Flies from Left to Right. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 14, 512–516. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Santiago, J. et al. 2011. Flexible Foundations of Abstract Thought: a Review and a Theory. In A. Mass & T.W. Schubert (eds.), Spatial dimensions of social thought (pp. 41–109). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Santiago, J. et al. 2010. In Hindsight, Life Flows from Left to Right. Psychological Research 74, 59–70. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, A.J., & Kaschak, M.P. 2011. Processing Time Shifts Affects the Execution of Motor Responses. Brain and Language 117, 39–44. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simon, J.R., & Rudell, A.P. 1967. Auditory S-R Compatibility: The Effect of an Irrelevant Cue on Information Processing. Journal of Applied Psychology 51, 300–304. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simonsohn, U. et al. 2014. P-curve: A Key to the File-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143, 534–547. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sternberg, S. 2001. Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them. Acta Psychologica 106, 147–246. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M.C. 2007. The Evolution of Foresight: What is Mental Time Travel, and is it Unique to Humans? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30, 299–351. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M.C. 2010. Behavioural Evidence for Mental Time Travel in Nonhuman Animals. Behavioural Brain Research 215, 292–298. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Talmy, L. 1988. Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition. Cognitive Science 12, 49–100. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Torralbo, A. et al. 2006. Flexible Conceptual Projection of Time onto Spatial Frames of Reference. Cognitive Science 30, 745–757. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, E.C. 1978. On the Expression of Spatio-temporal Relations in Language. In J.H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Human Language: Word Structure (pp. 369–400). Stanford: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tse, C.-S., & Altarriba, J. 2008. Evidence Against Linguistic Relativity in Chinese and English: A Case Study of Spatial and Temporal Metaphors. Journal of Cognition and Culture 8, 335–357. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tversky, B. et al. 1991. Cross-cultural and Developmental Trends in Graphic Productions. Cognitive Psychology 23, 515–557. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ulrich, R. et al. 2012. With the Past Behind and the Future Ahead: Back-to-front Representation of Past and Future Sentences. Memory and Cognition 40, 483–495. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ulrich, R., & Maienborn, C. 2010. Left-right Coding of Past and Future in Language: The Mental Timeline During Sentence Processing. Cognition 117, 126–138. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walker, E.J. et al. 2014. Disentangling Spatial Metaphors for Time Using Non-spatial Responses and Auditory Stimuli. Metaphor and Symbol 29, 316–327. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weger, U.W., & Pratt, J. 2008. Time Flies Like an Arrow: Space-time Compatibility Effects Suggest the Use of a Mental Timeline. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 15, 426–430. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwaan, R.A., & Rapp, D.N. 2006. Discourse Comprehension. In M.J. Traxler & M.A. Gernsbacher (eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 725–764). San Diego: Elsevier. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Ulrich, Rolf, Irmgard de la Vega, Verena Eikmeier, Fritz Günther & Barbara Kaup
2023.
Mental association of time and valence.
Memory & Cognition ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
von Sobbe, Linda, Edith Scheifele, Claudia Maienborn & Rolf Ulrich
2019.
The Space–Time Congruency Effect: A Meta‐Analysis.
Cognitive Science 43:1
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.