The Mental Timeline During the Processing of Linguistic Information
There is ample evidence that people use spatial concepts to think and speak
about time. Consistent with this notion, recent reaction time experiments
have documented that the spatial coordinates of responses influence speeded
decisions regarding temporal information. Specifically, classifying temporal linguistic
information produces a space-time congruency effect on reaction time
when responses with the left and right hand are arranged on the left-right axis.
A similar effect can be observed for responses that consist of movements along
the back-front axis. These findings are consistent with the view that time runs
from left to right or from back to front. In the present article we review these
results and assess the linguistic relevance of these two mental timelines for the
comprehension of linguistic information at the word and sentence level.
References (74)
References
Balota, D.A., et al. 2006. Visual Word Recognition: The Journey from Features to Meaning (a Travel Update). In M.J. Traxler & M.A. Gernsbacher (eds.) Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 285–375). Amsterdam: Elsevier. 

Barsalou, L.W. 2008. Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59, 617–645. 

Bender, A., & Beller, S. 2014. Mapping Spatial Frames of Reference onto Time: a Review of Theoretical Accounts and Empirical findings. Cognition 132, 342–382. 

Bergen, B.K., & Chan Lau, T.T. 2012. Writing Direction Affects how People Map Space onto Time. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 109. 

Boroditsky, L. 2000. Metaphoric Structuring: Understanding Time through Spatial Metaphors. Cognition 75, 1–28. 

Boroditsky, L. 2001. Does Language Shape Thought? Mandarin and English Speakers’ Conceptions of Time. Cognitive Psychology 43, 1–22. 

Boroditsky, L. et al. 2011. Do English and Mandarin Speakers Think about Time Differently? Cognition 118, 123–129. 

Burr, D. et al. 2007. Neural Mechanisms for Timing Visual Events are Spatially Selective in Real-world Coordinates. Nature Neuroscience 10, 423–425.
Casasanto, D. 2009. Embodiment of Abstract Concepts: Good and Bad in Right- and Left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138, 351–367. 

Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. 2008. Time in the Mind: Using Space to Think about Time. Cognition 106, 579–593. 

Casasanto, D., & Bottini, R. 2014. Mirror Reading can Reverse the Flow of Time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143, 437–479. 

Casasanto, D. et al. 2010. Space and Time in the Child’s Mind: Evidence for a Cross-dimensional Asymmetry. Cognitive Science 34, 387–405. 

Clark, H.H. 1973. Space, Time, and the Child. In T.E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.
Corallo, G. et al. 2008. Limits on Introspection: Distorted Subjective Time During the Dual-Task Bottleneck. Psychological Science 19, 1110–1117. 

de Groot, A.M.B. et al. 1986. Primed-lexical Decision: the Effect of Varying the Stimulus-onset Asynchrony of Prime and Target. Acta Psychologica 61, 17–36. 

Dehaene, S. et al. 1993. The Mental Representation of Parity and Number Magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122, 371–396. 

de la Fuente, J. et al. 2014. When you Think about It, your Past is in front of You: how Culture Shapes Spatial Conceptions of Time. Psychological Science 25, 1682–1690. 

de Sousa, H. 2012. Generational Differences in the Orientation of Time in Cantonese Speakers as a Function of Changes in the Direction of Chinese Writing. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 255. 

Eikmeier, V. et al. 2013. Dimensional Overlap Between Time and Space. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 20, 1120–1125. 

Eikmeier, V., & Ulrich, R. 2012a. The Influence of Spatial Priming on Processing of Time-related Words. Paper presented at the 54. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Mannheim, Germany.
Eikmeier, V., & Ulrich, R. 2012b. Priming the Mental Timeline: do Spatial Primes Influence the Processing of Time-related Words? Paper presented at Time and Temporality in Language and Human Experience (TimeLing), Łódź, Poland.
Emmorey, K. 2001. Space on Hand: the Exploitation of Signing Space to Illustrate Abstract Thought. In M. Gattis (ed.), Spatial Schemas and Abstract Thought (pp. 147–174). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Fiedler, K. 2011. Voodoo Correlations are Everywhere – Not Only in Neuroscience. Perspectives on Psychological Science 6, 163–171. 

Fraser, T.J. (ed.). 1966. The Voices of Time: A Cooperative Survey of the Man’s View of Time as Expressed by the Sciences and the Humanities. New York: George Braziller.
Fuhrman, O., & Boroditsky, L. 2010. Cross-cultural Differences in Mental Representations of Time: Evidence from an Implicit Nonlinguistic Task. Cognitive Science 34, 1430–1451. 

Fuhrman, O. et al. 2011. How Linguistic and Cultural Forces Shape Conceptions of Time: English and Mandarin Time in 3D. Cognitive Science 35, 1305–1328. 

Gentner, D. et al. 2002. As Times Goes by: Evidence for Two Systems in Processing Space – Time Metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes 17, 537–565. 

Glenberg, A.M., & Kaschak, M.P. 2002. Grounding Language in Action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9, 558–565. 

Graf, E.M. 2006. The Ontogenetic Development of Literal and Metaphorical Space in Language. Tübingen: Narr.
Grondin, S. 2001. From Physical Time to the First and Second Moments of Psychological Time. Psychological Bulletin 127, 22–44. 

Hartmann, M., & Mast, F.W. 2012. Moving Along the Mental Time Line Influences the Processing of Future Related Words. Consciousness and Cognition 21, 1558–1562. 

Haspelmath, M. 1997. From Space to Time: Temporal Advervials in the World’s Languages. München: Lincom Europa.
Klein, W. 2009. Concepts of Time. In W. Klein & P. Li (eds.), The Expression of Time (pp. 5–38). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 

Kong, F., & You, X. 2012. Space-time Compatibility Effects in the Auditory Modality. Experimental Psychology 59, 82–87. 

Lachmair, M. et al. 2011. Root versus Roof: Automatic Activation of Location Information During Word Processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 18, 1180–1188. 

Lakens, D. et al. 2011. The Sound of Time: Cross-modal Convergence in the Spatial Structuring of Time. Consciousness and Cognition 20, 437–443. 

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Libet, B. 2004. Mind Time: the Temporal Factor in Consciousness. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Havard University Press.
Mandler, G. 1992. Toward a Theory of Consciousness. In G. Hans-Georg, et al. (eds.), Cognition, Information Processing, and Psychophysics: Basic Pssues (pp. 43–65). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawerence Erlbaum.
McGlone, M.S., & Harding, J.L. 1998. Back (or Forward?) to the Future: The Role of Perspective in Temporal Language Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 24, 1211–1223. 

Miles, L.K. et al. 2010. Moving Through Time. Psychological Science 21, 222–223. 

Núñez, R., & Cooperrider, K. 2013. The Tangle of Space and Time in Human Cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17, 220–229. 

Núñez, R.E., & Sweetser, E. 2006. With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence from Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time. Cognitive Science 30, 401–450. 

Ouellet, M. et al. 2012. A Multisensory Interaction Effect in the Conceptual Realm of Time. Experimental Psychology 59, 236–242. 

Ouellet, M. et al. 2010. Thinking about the Future Moves Attention to the Right. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 36, 17–24. 

Ouellet, M. et al. 2010. Is the Future the Right Time? Experimental Psycholology 57, 308–314. 

Pashler, H., & Harris, C.R. 2012. Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7, 531–536. 

Radden, G. 2004. The Metaphor TIME AS SPACE Across Languages. In N. Baumgarten, et al. (eds.), Interkulturelle Kommunikation, Spracherwerb und Sprachvermittlung – das Leben mit mehreren Sprachen: Festschrift für Juliane House zum 60. Geburtstag (pp. 225–239). Bochum: Aks-Verlag.
Raposo, A. et al. 2009. Modulation of Motor and Premotor Cortices by Actions, Action Words and Action Sentences. Neuropsychologia 47, 388–396. 

Richards, M.M., & Hawpe, L.S. 1981. Contrasting Patterns in the Acquisition of Spatial/temporal Terms. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 32, 485–512. 

Rolke, B. et al. 2013. Priming the Mental Time-line: Effects of Modality and Processing Mode. Cognitive Processing 14, 231–244. 

Rosenthal, R. 1979. The File Drawer Problem and Tolerance for Null Results. Psychological Bulletin 86, 638–641. 

Santiago, J. et al. 2007. Time (also) Flies from Left to Right. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 14, 512–516. 

Santiago, J. et al. 2011. Flexible Foundations of Abstract Thought: a Review and a Theory. In A. Mass & T.W. Schubert (eds.), Spatial dimensions of social thought (pp. 41–109). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 

Santiago, J. et al. 2010. In Hindsight, Life Flows from Left to Right. Psychological Research 74, 59–70. 

Sell, A.J., & Kaschak, M.P. 2011. Processing Time Shifts Affects the Execution of Motor Responses. Brain and Language 117, 39–44. 

Simon, J.R., & Rudell, A.P. 1967. Auditory S-R Compatibility: The Effect of an Irrelevant Cue on Information Processing. Journal of Applied Psychology 51, 300–304. 

Simonsohn, U. et al. 2014. P-curve: A Key to the File-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143, 534–547. 

Sternberg, S. 2001. Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them. Acta Psychologica 106, 147–246. 

Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M.C. 2007. The Evolution of Foresight: What is Mental Time Travel, and is it Unique to Humans? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30, 299–351. 

Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M.C. 2010. Behavioural Evidence for Mental Time Travel in Nonhuman Animals. Behavioural Brain Research 215, 292–298. 

Talmy, L. 1988. Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition. Cognitive Science 12, 49–100. 

Torralbo, A. et al. 2006. Flexible Conceptual Projection of Time onto Spatial Frames of Reference. Cognitive Science 30, 745–757. 

Traugott, E.C. 1978. On the Expression of Spatio-temporal Relations in Language. In J.H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Human Language: Word Structure (pp. 369–400). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Tse, C.-S., & Altarriba, J. 2008. Evidence Against Linguistic Relativity in Chinese and English: A Case Study of Spatial and Temporal Metaphors. Journal of Cognition and Culture 8, 335–357. 

Tversky, B. et al. 1991. Cross-cultural and Developmental Trends in Graphic Productions. Cognitive Psychology 23, 515–557. 

Ulrich, R. et al. 2012. With the Past Behind and the Future Ahead: Back-to-front Representation of Past and Future Sentences. Memory and Cognition 40, 483–495. 

Ulrich, R., & Maienborn, C. 2010. Left-right Coding of Past and Future in Language: The Mental Timeline During Sentence Processing. Cognition 117, 126–138. 

Walker, E.J. et al. 2014. Disentangling Spatial Metaphors for Time Using Non-spatial Responses and Auditory Stimuli. Metaphor and Symbol 29, 316–327. 

Weger, U.W., & Pratt, J. 2008. Time Flies Like an Arrow: Space-time Compatibility Effects Suggest the Use of a Mental Timeline. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 15, 426–430. 

Zwaan, R.A., & Rapp, D.N. 2006. Discourse Comprehension. In M.J. Traxler & M.A. Gernsbacher (eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 725–764). San Diego: Elsevier. 

Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Mariconda, Alberto, Mauro Murgia, Matteo De Tommaso, Tiziano Agostini & Valter Prpic
2024.
SNARC-like effect for tempo is consistent for fast and full tempo ranges but still controversial for slow tempo range.
PeerJ 12
► pp. e18009 ff.

Ulrich, Rolf, Irmgard de la Vega, Verena Eikmeier, Fritz Günther & Barbara Kaup
2024.
Mental association of time and valence.
Memory & Cognition 52:2
► pp. 444 ff.

von Sobbe, Linda, Edith Scheifele, Claudia Maienborn & Rolf Ulrich
2019.
The Space–Time Congruency Effect: A Meta‐Analysis.
Cognitive Science 43:1

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.