Introspective judgments are often used in linguistics to obtain information about speakers’ mental representations of language. This chapter addresses two questions, namely: what shapes speakers’ judgments, and what such judgments provide information about. I argue that speakers’ judgments are influenced by their theories of language, which in turn are partly shaped by our experience with written language. The fundamental units that linguists use in their analyses – phonemes, words, and sentences – are largely products of a particular written tradition; and grammaticality judgments about isolated sentences are, to a considerable extent, judgments about what is acceptable in written language. Thus, linguistic intuitions are not direct reflections of mental representations of linguistic knowledge, but of speakers’ sensitivity to socially constituted norms.
1991Intuition-based and observation-based grammars. In K. Aijmen & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics: Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik (44–62). London: Longman.
Adrián, J.A., Alegria, J., & Morais, J.
1995Metaphonological abilities of Spanish illiterate adults. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 329–353.
2007The future of Inuktitut in the face of majority languages: Bilingualism or language shift?Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 515–536.
2012Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.
Bürki, A., Spinelli, E., & Gareth, G.M.
2012A written word is worth a thousand spoken words: The influence of spelling on spoken-word production. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 449–467.
1985Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In D.R. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (105–123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2001Native speaker variations in syntactic competence: Implications for first language teaching. Language Awareness, 10, 107–124.
1997The LAD goes to school: A cautionary tale for nativists. Linguistics, 35, 735–766.
2008The effects of frequency and neighbourhood density on adult speakers’ productivity with Polish case inflections: An empirical test of usage-based approaches to morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 931–951.
2010Naive v. expert competence: An empirical study of speaker intuitions. The Linguistic Review, 27, 1–23.
2006Individual differences in language attainment: Comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers. Language Sciences, 28, 604–615.
1985Effects of printed language acquisition on speech. In D.R. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (333–367). New York: Cambridge University Press.
1990The complexity of oral syntax. In B.K. Halford & H. Pilch (Eds.), Syntax gesprochener Sprachen (33–43). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
1989Spoken and written language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
1981The language myth. London: Duckworth.
1994The last stages of the acquisition of syntax: The interaction of reading and syntactic development. In V.B. Makkai (Ed.), The twentieth LACUS forum 1993 (654–663). Chapel Hill, NC: Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States.
Holden, M.H., & MacGinitie, W.H.
1972Children’s conceptions of word boundaries in speech and print. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 551–557.
1977Early blooming and late blooming syntactic structures. In C.L. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing (91–104). Buffalo: State University of Buffalo.
1992Psychological reality of the word in Chinese. Advances in Psychology, 90, 113–130.
Jakimik, J., Cole, R.A., & Rudnicky, A.I.
1985Sound and spelling in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 165–178.
Juffermans, K., & Veldhuis, D.
2012Comparing spelling and segmentation practices in three versions of a Mandinka text. In J. Blommaert, P. Varis, S. Lehtonen, & M. Spotti (Eds.), Papers in culture studies 34 (1–28). Tilburg: Tilburg University.
Karanth, P., Kudva, A., & Vijayan, A.
1995Literacy and linguistic awareness. In B. de Gelder & J. Morais (Eds.), Speech and reading: A comparative approach (303–316). Hove Erlbaum (UK): Taylor & Francis.
Karmiloff-Smith, A., Grant, J., Sims, K., Jones, M.-C., & Cuckle, P.
1996Rethinking metalinguistic awareness: Representing and accessing knowledge about what counts as a word. Cognition, 58, 197–219.
Kim, J.-H., Montrul, S., & Yoon, J.
2010Dominant language influence in acquisition and attrition of binding: Interpretation of the Korean reflexive caki. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 73–84.
Kurvers, J., & Uri, H.
2006Metalexical awareness: Development, methodology or written language? A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35(4), 353–367.
Kurvers, J., Vallen, T., & van Hout, R.
2006Discovering features of language: Metalinguistic awareness of adult illiterates. In I. van de Craats, J. Kurvers, & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Low-educated second language and literacy acquisition: Proceedings of the inaugural symposium Tilburg 2005 (69–88). Utrecht: LOT.
1975What is a linguistic fact? Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press.
1996When intuitions fail. In
Papers from the parasession on theory and data in linguistics
, Chicago Linguistic Society 32, 76–106.
2004Topic chains in Chinese discourse. Discourse Processes, 37, 25–45.
2005The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations. London: Routledge.
Miller, J., & Weinert, R.
1998Spontaneous spoken language: Syntax and discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
1986Literacy training and speech segmentation. Cognition, 24, 45–64.
Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P.
1979Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously?Cognition, 7, 415–438.
2002Intuition: Its powers and perils. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2009Syntactic judgment experiments. Language & Linguistics Compass, 3, 406–423.
Nagy, W.E., & Anderson, R.C.
1995Metalinguistic awareness and literacy acquisition in different languages. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Centre for the Study of Reading.
1998Later language development: The school-age and adolescent years. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
Nisbett, R.E., & Wilson, T.D.
1977Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.
Pattamadilok, C., Morais, J., Ventura, P., & Kolinsky, R.
2007The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition: Further evidence from French. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 700–726.
Pawley, A., & Syder, F.H.
1983Natural selection in syntax: Notes on adaptive variation and change in vernacular and literary grammar. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, 551–579.
1984Children’s writing and reading. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
1986Language acquisition and writing. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (Eds.), Language acquisition: Studies in first language development (494–618). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perfetti, C.A., & McCutchen, D.
1987Schooled language competence: linguistic abilities in reading and writing. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics. Vol 2: Reading, writing, and language learning (105–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perre, L., Pattamadilok, C., Montant, M., & Ziegler, J.C.
2009Orthographic effects in spoken language: On-line activation or phonological restructuring?Brain Research, 1275, 73–80.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartnik, J.
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Ramachandra, V., & Karanth, P.
2007The role of literacy in the conceptualization of words: Data from Kannada-speaking children and non-literate adults. Reading and Writing, 20, 173–199.
Read, C.A., Zhang, Y.-F., Nie, H.-Y., & Ding, B.-Q.
1986The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing. Cognition, 24, 31–44.
Rong, L., & Hongjun, W.
2012What are the basic units of Mandarin Chinese discourse?International Journal of Knowledge and Language Processing, 3, 1–17.
2000Space between words: The origins of silent reading. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Scholes, R.J., & Willis, B.J.
1987Literacy and language. Journal of Literary Semantics, 16(1), 3–11.
1996The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Seidenberg, M.S., & Tanenhaus, M.K.
1979Orthographic effect on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 546–554.
Shen, J., & Gu, Y.
1997Conversation and sentence-hood. Text, 17, 477–489.
1991Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Song, M., O’Grady, W., Cho, S., & Lee, M.
1997The learning and teaching of Korean in community schools. In Y.-H. Kim (Ed.), Korean language in America 2 (111–127). Seattle: American Associations of Teachers of Korean.
Street, J., & Dąbrowska, E.
2010More individual differences in language attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers?Lingua, 120, 2080–2094.
Street, J., & Dąbrowska, E.
2014Lexically specific knowledge and individual differences in adult native speakers’ processing of the English passive. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(01), 97–118.
2004Relative clauses in spoken English and German – Their structure and function. Linguistische Berichte, 197, 3–51.
Ziegler, J.C., Petrova, A., & Fernand, L.
2008Feedback consistency effects in visual and auditory word recognition: Where do we stand after more than a decade?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 34, 643–661.
Cited by 4 other publications
Winter, Bodo & Marcus Perlman
2021. Iconicity ratings really do measure iconicity, and they open a new window onto the nature of language. Linguistics Vanguard 7:1
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.