The hand is a rich source of figurative language. The paper claims that this richness has to do with the central role of the hand in human active involvement in the world. This claim fits recent developments in phenomenological philosophy, according to which cognition is based on enactive embodiment. The empirical part of the paper uses examples from Dutch and other languages, both on the lexical and the phraseological level. It turns out that most figurative uses of the words for ‘hand’ are of the metonymic type. Special attention is given to the target domain of numerals. Finally, it is shown that laterality plays a role: The right hand is used in figurative expressions with a positive connotation, whereas the left hand leads to expressions with a negative connotation.
Ahn, H. J., & Kwon, Y. J.2007. A study on metaphor and metonymy of Hand. Journal of Language Sciences, 14(2), 195–215.
Armstrong, D. F., Stokoe, W. C., & Wilcox, S. E.1995. Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barnden, J. A.2010. Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 1–34.
Baş, M.2015. Conceptualization of emotion through body part idioms in Turkish: A cognitive linguistic study. PhD Hacetepe University, Ankara.
Bell, C.1833. The hand: Its mechanisms and vital endowments as evincing design. London: William Pickering.
Blomberg, J., & Zlatev, J.2014. Actual and non-actual motion: Why experientialist semantics needs phenomenology (and vice versa). Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13(3), 395–418.
Brenzinger, M., & Kraska-Szlenk, I. (Eds.). 2014. The body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic embodiment. [Brill’s studies in language, cognition and culture 8]. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Casasanto, D.2014. Bodily relativity. In Lawrence Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (108–117). New York: Routledge.
Corballis, M.1991. The lopsided ape: Evolution of the generative mind. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Corballis, M.2002. From hand to mouth: The origins of language. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Crow, T.2004. Directionality is the key to the origin of modern Homo sapiens (the Broca-Annett axiom): A reply to Rogers’ view of ‘The speciation of modern homo sapiens’. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 9(2), 233–242.
Cushing, F. H.1892. Manual concepts: A study of the influence of hand-usage on culture-growth. American Anthropologist, 5(4), 289–318.
Dehaene, S.1997. The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Duden. 2002. Redewendungen: Wörterbuch der deutschen Idiomatik. 2nd edition. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
Enfield, N. J., Majid, A., & van Staden, M.2006. Cross-linguistic categorization of the body: Introduction. Language Sciences, 28, 137–147.
Erzse, K.2006. Hand und Fuß im interkulturellen Vergleich: Eine kontrastive Untersuchung von Redewendungen im Deutschen und Rumänischen. Germanistische Beiträge, 20–21, 179–254. [URL]
Everett, D. L.2012. Language: The cultural tool. New York: Pantheon.
Geeraerts, D.2002. The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in composite expressions. In R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (435–465). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
van Ginneken, J.1939. La reconstruction typologique des langues archaïques de l’humanité. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers-Maatschappij.
Goossens, L.1990. Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 417–451.
Heine, B.1997. Cognitive foundations of grammar. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heine, B.2014. The body in language: Observations from grammaticalization. In M. Brenzinger, & I. Kraska-Szlenk (Eds.), The body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic embodiment. [Brill’s studies in language, cognition and culture 8] (13–32). Leiden & Boston: Brill.
Kraska-Szlenk, I.2014. Semantic extensions of body part terms: common patterns and their interpretation. Language Sciences, 44, 15–39.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Leader, D.2016. Hands: What we do with them – and why. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Levinson, S. C., & Holler, J.2014. The origin of human multimodal communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20130302.
Luján M., & Ramón, E.1999. The Indo-European system of numerals from ‘1’ to ’10’. In J. Gvozdanović (Ed.), Numeral types and changes worldwide (199–219). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Maalej, Z.2014. Body parts we live by in language and culture: The raaS ‘Head’ and yidd ‘Hand’ in Tunisian Arabic. In M. Brenzinger, & I. Kraska-Szlenk (Eds.), The body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic embodiment. [Brill’s studies in language, cognition and culture 8] (224–259). Leiden & Boston: Brill.
Majewicz, A. F.1984. Le rôle du doigt et de la main et leurs désignations en certaines langues dans la formation des systèmes particuliers de numération et des noms de nombre. Lingua Posnaniensis, 26, 69–84.
Marchand, T. H. J.2012. Knowledge in hand: Explorations of brain, hand and tool. In R. Fardon, O. Harris, T. H. J. Marchand, M. Nuttal, C. Shore, V. Strang, & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social anthropology, Vol. 2 (261–270). London: Sage Publications.
Márquez Linares, C., & Moreno Ortiz, A.1999. Fraseología comparada mediante el uso de córpora textuales: el caso de mano/hand. In Estudios de lingüística descriptiva y comparada (293–304). Sevilla: Kronos.
McGinn, C.2015. Prehension: The hand and the emergence of humanity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
McManus, C.2002. Right hand, left hand: The origins of asymmetry in brains, bodies, atoms and cultures. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
McNeill, D.2012. How language began: Gesture and speech in human evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M.1945. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
Morrow, P. R.2009. Hand and heart: A study of the uses and phraseology associated with two common nouns. Language and Culture, Publication of Nagoya University, 20:2.
Pasch, H.2014. Embodiment in Zande. In M. Brenzinger, & I. Kraska-Szlenk (Eds.), The body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic embodiment. [Brill’s studies in language, cognition and culture 8] (199–223). Leiden & Boston: Brill.
Philippa, M., Debrandere, F., Quak, A., Schoonheim, T., & van der Sijs, N.2003–2009. Etymologisch woordenboek van het Nederlands [‘Etymological dictionary of Dutch’]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Radman, Z. (Ed.). 2013. The hand, an organ of the mind. What the manual tells the mental. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Révész, G.1958. The human hand: a psychological study. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. [Original: De menschelijke hand. Amsterdam: Noord Hollandsche Uitgeversmaatschappij 1941].
Roebroeks, W.2014. Archeology: Art on the move. Nature, 514, 170–171.
Röhr, H. M.1994. Writing: Its evolution and relation to speech. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Galera-Masegosa, A.2011. Going beyond metaphtonymy: Metaphoric and metonymic complexes in phrasal verb interpretation. Language Value, 3(1), 1–29.
Sadikaj, S.2009. Metaphorische Konzepte in somatischen Phraseologismen des Deutschen und Albanischen: Eine kontrastive Untersuchung anhand von Herz- und Hand-Somatismen. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Würzburg. ([URL])
Sharifian, F., Dirven, R., Yu, N., & Niemeier, S. (Eds.). 2008. Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Staffeldt, S.2011. Die phraseologische Konstruktionsfamilie [X Präp Hand Verb]. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 39, 188–216.
Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E. A. (Eds.). 2010. Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Talento, S.2014. What hands/arms can say: A corpus-based analysis of the Swahili body-art terms mkono and mikono. In M. Brenzinger, & I. Kraska-Szlenk (Eds.), The body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic embodiment. [Brill’s studies in language, cognition and culture 8] (260–283). Leiden & Boston: Brill.
Tiberius, C., & Schoonheim, T.2014. A frequency dictionary of Dutch. London: Routledge.
Vainik, E.2009. Towards a conceptualized model of bodily communication: A study of hand-expressions in Estonian. In J. Zlatev, M. Andrén, C. Lundmark, & M. Falck Johnsson (Eds.), Studies in language and cognition (438–453). London: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E.1991. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Vogiatzis, A.2012. Greek and English idioms with HAND: A Cognitive perspective. Master Thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Westmoreland, P.2016. A philosophical approach to the concept of handedness: The phenomenology of lived experience in left- and right-handers. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition.
Wils, J.1965. Merleau Ponty’s taalbegrip en de moderne linguïstiek [‘Merleau Ponty’s understanding of language and modern Linguistics]. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte en Psychologie, 57(2), 1–32.
Wilson, F. R.1998. The hand: How its use shapes the brain, language, and human culture. New York: Vintage books.
De Witte, J. J. de.1948. De betekeniswereld van het lichaam. Taalpsychologische, taalvergelijkende studie. [The meaning world of the body. Language psychological, language comparative study]. PhD dissertation, Nijmegen.
Woelert, P.2014. Tool use and the human mind: From basic to materially mediated operative intentionality. Cognitive Semiotics, 7(2), 227–247.
2021. Staffeldt, Sven. 2018. Gebrauchssemantik von Hand. Korpusbasierte Studien zu somatischen Phraseologismen des Deutschen mit der Konstituente Hand (Stauffenburg Linguistik, Band 98). Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag. 513 S., € 78, ISBN 978-3-95809-519-9.. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 2021:74 ► pp. 143 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.