Cover not available
Part of
Motion and Space across Languages: Theory and applications
Edited by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
[Human Cognitive Processing 59] 2017
► pp. 13–36

Introduction
Motion and semantic typology

A hot old topic with exciting caveats

| Universidad de Zaragoza
Article outline
  • 1.Theoretical framework: Lexicalization patterns and neo-relativistic variants
    • 1.1Lexicalization patterns and how speakers talk about motion
  • 2.Caveats, less studied issues, and much more
  • 3.Chapters in this collection: The MovEs project and beyond
  • 4.Future ahead
  • References
Published online: 14 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.59.02iba
References (94)
References
Acedo-Matellán, V., & Mateu, J. 2013. Satellite-framed Latin vs. verb-framed Romance: A syntactic approach. Probus, 25(2), 227–265.Google Scholar
Alonso-Alonso, R. 2016. Cross-linguistic influence in the interpretation of boundary-crossing events in L2 acquisition. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 14(1), 161–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aske, J. 1989. Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 15, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Athanasopoulos, P., & Treffers-Daller, J. (Eds.). 2015. Language diversity and bilingual processing. Special issue. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(5). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bally, Ch. 1932. Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Paris: Ernest Leroux.Google Scholar
Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, S.-W. 2010. The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 44, 183–316.Google Scholar
Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. (Eds.). 1994. Relating events in narrative. A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Berthele, R. 2006. Ort und Weg. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der sprachlichen Raumreferenz in Varietäten des Deutschen, Rätoromanischen und Französischen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. Disentangling manner and path. Evidence from varieties of German and Romance. In J. Goschler, & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (55–75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. When bilinguals forget their manners. Language dominance and motion event descriptions in French and German. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 39–70.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J., Enfield, N. J., Essegbey, J., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kita, S., Lüpke, F., & Ameka, F. K. 2007. Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language, 83(3), 495–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, A., & Gullberg, M. 2008. Bidirectional crosslinguistic influence in L1–L2 encoding of manner in speech and gesture: A study of Japanese speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 225–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cifuentes-Férez, P. 2009. A crosslinguistic study on the motion verbs in English and Spanish. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C. 2010. Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In H. C. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive studies in construction grammar (201–235). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Cadierno, T. (Eds.). 2009. Constructing a second language. Special section of Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanego, T. 2012. Motion events in English: The emergence and diachrony of Manner salience from Old English to Late Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica, 33, 29–85.Google Scholar
2013. Constructing causation in language and memory: Implications for access to justice in multilingual interactions. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 20(1), 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filipović, L., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2015. Motion. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Mouton handbook of cognitive linguistics (526–545). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flecken, M., Athanasopoulos, P., Kuipers, J. R., & Thierry, G. 2015. On the road to somewhere: Brain potentials reflect language effects on motion event perception. Cognition, 141, 41–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. 1989. Mind, code, and context: Essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Grinevald, C. 2011. On constructing a working typology of the expression of path. Cahiers de Faits de Langue, 3, 43–70.Google Scholar
Han, Z.-H., & Cadierno, T. (Eds.). 2010. Linguistic relativity in SLA: Thinking for speaking. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hong, C.-S. 1985. Syntaxe des verbes de mouvement en coréen contemporain. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. In press. Motion and the English verb. A diachronic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Iacobini, C. 2015. “Particle-verbs in Romance”. In P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen, & F. Rainer (Eds.) Word-formation. An international handbook of the languages of Europe, 626–658. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Iacobini, C., & Fagard, B. 2011. A diachronic approach to variation and change in the typology of motion event expression. A case study: From Latin to Romance. Cahiers de Faits de Langue, 3, 151–171.Google Scholar
Iacobini, C., & Masini, F. 2007. Verb-particle constructions and prefixed verbs in Italian: Typology, diachrony and semantics. In G. Booij, L. Ducceschi, B. Fradin, E. Guevara, A. Ralli, & S. Scalise (Eds.), On-line proceedings of the fifth Mediterranean morphology meeting (157–184). Bologna: Università degli studi di Bologna.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2004. Language typologies in our language use: The case of Basque motion events in adult oral narratives. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 317–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Sound symbolism and motion in Basque. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
2009. Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (403–414). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Filipović, L. 2013. Lexicalisation patterns and translation. In A. Rojo, & I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and translation: Advances in some theoretical models and applications (251–281). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ikegami, Y. 1970. The semiological structure of the English verbs of motion: A stratificational approach. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, N. 2017. Use of mimetics in Motion event descriptions by English and Korean learners of L2 Japanese: Does language typology make a difference? In N. Iwasaki, P. Sells, & K. Akita (Eds.), The grammar of Japanese mimetics. Perspectives from structure, acquisition, and translation (193–218). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. 2003. What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lai, V. T., Garrido-Rodriguez, G., & Narasimhan, B. 2013. Thinking for speaking in early and late bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(1), 139–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. 1992. The lexical semantics of verbs of motion: The perspective from unaccusativity. In I. M. Roca (Ed.), Thematic structure: Its role in grammar (247–269). Berlin: Foris. DOI logo zGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. 2003. Space in language and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D. P. 2006. Grammars of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mani, I., & Pustejvosky, J. 2012. Interpreting motion. Grounded representations for spatial language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2000. Analogic/analytic representations and cross-linguistic differences in thinking for speaking. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 43–60.Google Scholar
2005. Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D., & Duncan, S. 2000. Growth points in thinking for speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (141–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. 2003. Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In S. Chiba et al. (Eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A festschrift for Masaru Kajita (403–417). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Morimoto, Y. 2001. Los verbos de movimiento. Madrid: Visor Libros.Google Scholar
Noonan, M. 2003. Motion events in Chantyal. In E. Shay, & U. Seibert (Eds.), Motion, direction and location in languages – in honor of Zygmunt Frajzyngier (211–234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuckolls, J. B. 2014. ‘Ideophones’ challenges for typological linguistics. The case of Pastaza Quichua. Pragmatics and Society, 5(3), 355–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (Ed.). 2011. Thinking and speaking in two languages. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pawlak, N. 1986. Expressing spatial relations in the Hausa language. Warsaw: Warsaw University.Google Scholar
Porquier, R. 2001. ‘Il m’a sauté dessus’, ‘je lui ai couru après’: Un cas de postposition en français. Journal of French Language Studies, 11, 123–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulverman, R., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Sootsman Buresh, J. 2008. Infants discriminate manners and paths in non-linguistic dynamic events. Cognition, 108, 825–830. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogura, M. 2002. Verbs of motion in Medieval English. Cambridge: Boydell & Brewer.Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş. 2015. Ways of crossing a spatial boundary in typologically distinct languages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 485–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Furman, R., & Brown, A. 2005. How does linguistic framing of events influence co-speech gestures? Insights from cross-linguistic variations and similarities. Gesture, 5, 215–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ricca, D. 1993. I verbi deittici di movimento in Europa: Una ricerca interlinguistica. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge.
Schøsler, L. 2008. L’expression des traits manière et direction des verbes de mouvement. Perspectives diachroniques et typologiques. In E. Stark, R. Schmidt-Riese, & E. Stoll (Eds.), Romanische Syntax im Wandel (113–132). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Schröder, J. 1993. Lexikon deutscher Verben der Fortbewegung. Berlin/Leipzig: Langenscheidt/Verlag Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
Senft, G. 1997. Referring to space: Studies in Austronesian and Papuan languages. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Shull, S. 2003. The experience of space. The privileged role of spatial prefixation in Czech and Russian. Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Sitoe, B. 2001. Verbs of motion in Changana. Leiden: Research School, CNWS.Google Scholar
Skopeteas, S. 2008. Encoding spatial relations: Language typology and diachronic change in Greek. Language Typology and Universals, 61, 54–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996. Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (195–220). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2003. Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (157–192). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1997. Mind, code, and text. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón (437–467). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeier, & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (107–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2005. Relating narrative events in translation. In D. D. Ravid, & H. B.-Z. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman (115–129). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. What makes manner of motion salient?: Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (59–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. From S-language and V-language to PIN and PIV. Paper presented at the workshop Human Locomotion across Languages. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 6 June 2008.
Slobin, D. I., & Hoiting, N. 1994. Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 20, 487–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kopecka, A., & Majid, A. 2014. Manners of human gait: A crosslinguistic event-naming study. Cognitive Linguistics, 25, 701–741. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stam, G. 2015. Changes in thinking for speaking: A longitudinal case study. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 83–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stolova, N. I. 2015. Cognitive linguistics and lexical change. Motion verbs from Latin to Romance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Storjohann, P. 2003. A diachronic contrastive lexical field analysis of verbs of human locomotion in German and English. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Y. 2005. Not all verb-framed languages are created equal: The case of Japanese. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 31, 299–310.Google Scholar
Svorou, S. 1994. The grammar of space. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, 480–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000a. Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000b. Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
In press. The targeting system of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tesnière, L. 1959. Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Toratani, K. 2012. The role of sound-symbolic forms in motion event descriptions. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 10(1), 90–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wälchi, B., & Cysouw, M. 2012. Lexical typology through similarity semantics: Toward a semantic map of motion verbs. Linguistics, 50(3), 671–710.Google Scholar
Wolff, P., & Holmes, K. J. 2011. Linguistic relativity. WIREs Cog Sci, 2, 253–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yiu, C. Y.-M. 2014. The typology of motion events. An empirical study of Chinese dialects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L., & Oh, E. 2007. On the syntactic composition of manner and motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Tuuri, Emilia & Maija Belliard
2024. Boundary-crossing situations and the use of deictic verbs in Finnish and Estonian expressions of non-actual motion. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Alonso Alonso, Rosa
2020. Boundary-crossing events across languages. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:2 ► pp. 316 ff. DOI logo
Cappelle, Bert
2020. Chapter 8. Looking into visual motion expressions in Dutch, English, and French. In Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions [Human Cognitive Processing, 69], ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
De Knop, Sabine
2020. From construction grammar to embodied construction practice. Constructions and Frames 12:1 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
De Knop, Sabine
2022. From construction grammar to embodied construction practice. In Construction Grammar across Borders [Benjamins Current Topics, 122], ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Matsumoto, Yo
2020. Chapter 9. Neutral and specialized path coding. In Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions [Human Cognitive Processing, 69], ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Meex, Birgitta
2020. Chapter 3. Patterns of path encoding in German. In Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions [Human Cognitive Processing, 69], ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Granularity in the Verbalization of Events and Objects [Studies in Language Companion Series, 233], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.