Cover not available
Part of
Motion and Space across Languages: Theory and applications
Edited by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
[Human Cognitive Processing 59] 2017
► pp. 39–60

Chapter 1
The typology of manner expressions

A preliminary look

| Nagoya University
The morphosyntax of manner expressions has attracted less attention than that of path expressions in the framing typology. Drawing primarily on experimental and quantitative data in Japanese and English, we propose and examine three parameters in the complex typology of manner expressions. It is argued that coarse-grained, event-inherent manners that the speaker does not intend to stress (e.g. normal running) are more likely to be realized in tight morphosyntactic constructions headed by manner verbs than fine-grained, event-concomitant manners that the speaker intends to stress (e.g. an annoying and characteristic shout of a jogger). The proposed parameters appear to share an iconic, communicative motivation that links pragmatic prominence with morphosyntactic prominence.
Keywords: grain size, event inherence, expressiveness, ideophones, Japanese, English
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous studies
    • 2.1Manner and manner expressions
    • 2.2Manner and the framing typology
  • 3.Grain size
  • 4.Event inherence
  • 5.Expressiveness
  • 6.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.59.03aki
References (66)
References
Akita, K. 2009. A grammar of sound-symbolic words in Japanese: Theoretical approaches to iconic and lexical properties of mimetics. Ph.D. Dissertation, Kobe University.Google Scholar
2012. Toward a frame-semantic definition of sound-symbolic words: A collocational analysis of Japanese mimetics. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(1), 67–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. Expressiveness in mimetic syntax: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and English. Paper presented at the Grammar of Mimetics Workshop. SOAS, University of London, London, UK, 10 May 2013.
2015. Yootai-hyoogen no ruikeiron ni okeru yootai no tenkeisei [The typicality of manner in the typology of manner expressions]. In Y. Yumoto, & N. Ono (Eds.), Goi-imiron no arata nakanoosei o sagutte [Searching for new possibilities of lexical semantics] (354–380). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Akita, K., Matsumoto, Y., & Ohara, K. H. 2010. Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron ni okeru tyokuzi-teki-keiro-hyoogen to yootai-goi-repaatorii [Deictic path expressions and manner lexicon in the typology of motion expressions]. In T. Kageyama (Ed.), Lexicon forum, 5 (1–25). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Akita, K., & Usuki, T. 2016. A constructional account of the “optionality” of quotative marking on Japanese mimetics. Journal of Linguistics, 52(2), 245–275. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Allen, S., Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., Ishizuka, T., & Fujii, M. 2007. Language-specific and universal influences in children’s syntactic packaging of Manner and Path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition, 102, 16–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, S. W. 2010. The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 46(2), 331–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, H. C. 2008. Toward a frame-constructional approach to verb classification. In E. S. Acevedo, & F. J. C. Rodríguez (Eds.), Grammar, constructions, and interfaces: Special issue of Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 57, 17–48.Google Scholar
Cardini, F. E. 2008. Manner of motion saliency: An inquiry into Italian. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(4), 533–569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Childs, G. T. 1994. African ideophones. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (178–204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cifuentes-Férez, P. 2010. The semantics of the English and the Spanish motion verb lexicons. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 8(2), 233–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C. 2010. Revisiting Talmy’s typological classification of complex events. In H. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive construction grammar (201–235). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diemer, S. 2011. Corpus linguistics with Google? Proceedings of the Second Conference of International Society for the Linguistics of English. [URL]Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. 2011. The meaning and use of ideophones in Siwu. Ph.D. Dissertation, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics & Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
2017. Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF – Language Typology and Universals, 70(2), 119–141.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M., & Akita, K. 2016. An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics, FirstView. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2002. Cultural logic and syntactic productivity: Associated posture constructions in Lao. In N. J. Enfield (Ed.), Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture (231–258). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Güldemann, T. 2008. Quotative indexes in African languages: A synchronic and diachronic survey. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamano, S. 1998. The sound-symbolic system of Japanese. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J. J. (Eds.). 1994. Sound symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hirose, M. 1981. Japanese and English contrastive lexicology: The role of Japanese “mimetic” adverbs. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hundt, M., Nesselhauf, N., & Biewer, C. (Eds.). 2007. Corpus linguistics and the Web Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2006. Sound symbolism and motion in Basque. München: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Iwata, S. 2002. Does MANNER count or not?: Manner-of-motion verbs revisited. Linguistics, 40(1), 61–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Where there’s a sound, there’s motion: Two types of path PPs that appear after verbs of sound emission. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference of Construction Grammar. University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, 3 September 2006.
Kakehi, H., Tamori, I., & Schourup, L. 1996. Dictionary of iconic expressions in Japanese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kawachi, K. 2014. Patterns of expressing motion events in Kupsapiny. In O. Hieda (Ed.), Recent advances in Nilotic linguistics (103–136). Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Kita, S. 1997. Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics, 35(2), 379–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. Semantic schism and interpretive integration in Japanese sentences with a mimetic: A reply to Tsujimura. Linguistics, 39(2), 419–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kloe, D. R. 1977. A dictionary of onomatopoeic sounds, tones and noises in English and Spanish including those of animals, man, nature, machinery and musical instruments, together with some that are not imitative or echoic. Detroit, MI: Blaine Ethridge.Google Scholar
Levin, B. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2015. Verb classes within and across languages. In A. Malchukov, & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the World's languages. Vol. 2: Case studies from New Guinea, Australia, and the Americas, and theoretical outlook (1627–1670). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levin, B., Song, G., & Atkins, B. T. S. 1997. Making sense of corpus data: A case study of verbs of sound. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 2(1), 23–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, B. C., Ameel, E., Imai, M., Gennari, S. P., Saji, N., & Majid, A. 2014. Human locomotion in languages: Constraints on moving and meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 74, 107–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. 2003. Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In S. Chiba et al. (Eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A Festschrift for Masaru Kajita (403–417). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
2013. Determinants of Manner, Path, and Deixis saliency across languages. Paper presented at the International Workshop SYLEX III: Space and Motion across Languages and Applications. University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain, 21 November 2013.
Nasu, A. 2002. Nihongo-onomatope no gokeisei to inritu-koozoo [Word formation and prosodic structures of Japanese onomatopoeia]. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Tsukuba.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, J. B. 1996. Sounds like life: Sound-symbolic grammar, performance, and cognition in Pastaza Quechua. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ohara, K. H. 2002. Linguistic encodings of motion events in Japanese and English: A preliminary look. The Hiyoshi Review of English Studies, 41, 122–153.Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş., & Slobin, D. I. 2003. Codability effects on the expression of manner of motion in Turkish and English. In A. S. Özsoy, D. Akar, M. Nakipoğlu-Demiralp, E. Erguvanlı-Taylan, & A. Aksu-Koç (Eds.), Studies in Turkish linguistics (259–270). Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.Google Scholar
Saito, T. 2011. An investigation of the linguistic encoding of motion and state-change events in English and Japanese through Talmy’s typology. Ph.D. Dissertation, Tohoku University.Google Scholar
Schaefer, R. P. 2001. Ideophonic adverbs and manner gaps in Emai. In F. K. E. Voeltz, & C. Kilian-Hatz (Eds.), Ideophones (339–354). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, E. 2000. Simple and complex verbs in Jaminjung: A study of event categorisation in an Australian language. Wageningen: Ponsen & Looijen.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 1997. Mind, code, and text. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón (437–467). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeier, & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (107–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2006. What makes manner of motion salient?: Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (59–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snell-Hornby, M. 1983. Verb-descriptivity in German and English: A contrastive study in semantic fields. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Sohn, H. 1994. Korean. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Y. 2005. Not all verb-framed languages are created equal: The case of Japanese. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 31, 299–310.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, 480–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tamori, I., & Schourup, L. 1999. Onomatope: Keitai to imi [Onomatopoeia: Form and meaning]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Tamura, Y. 2006. Characteristics of English sound-emission path construction: A prototype cross-linguistic account. In M. Yamanashi (Ed.), Studies in Cognitive Linguistics, 5 (209–242). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. 1996. On running and jogging. Cognitive Linguistics, 7(1), 21–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toratani, K. 2006. On the optionality of to-marking on reduplicated mimetics in Japanese. In T. J. Vance, & K. Jones (Eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics, 14 (415–422). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2012. The role of sound-symbolic forms in Motion event descriptions: The case of Japanese. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 10(1), 90–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. The position of to/∅-marked mimetics in Japanese sentence structure. In N. Iwasaki, P. Sells, & K. Akita (Eds.), The grammar of Japanese mimetics. Perspectives from structure, acquisition, and translation (35–72). London: Routledge.
Van Valin, R. D., Jr., & LaPolla, R. J. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voeltz, F. K. E., & Kilian-Hatz, C. (Eds.). 2001. Ideophones. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
WebCorp: The Web as Corpus. Research and Development Unit for English Studies, Birmingham City University. [URL]
Wienold, G. 1995. Lexical and conceptual structures in expressions for movement and space: With reference to Japanese, Korean, Thai, and Indonesian as compared to English and German. In U. Egli, P. E. Pause, C. Schwarze, A. Stechow, & G. Wienold (Eds.), Lexical knowledge in the organisation of language (301–340). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, A. M., & Pullum, G. K. 1987. Plain morphology and expressive morphology. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 13, 330–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Menete, Sérgio N. & Guiying Jiang
2024. Another member out of the family: the description of manner of gait in Changana verbs of motion. Folia Linguistica 0:0 DOI logo
Ryzhova, Daria, Ekaterina Rakhilina, Tatiana Reznikova & Yulia Badryzlova
2024. Lexical systems with systematic gaps: verbs of falling. Folia Linguistica 58:1 ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Taremaa, Piia & Anetta Kopecka
2023. Manner of motion in Estonian. Studies in Language 47:1 ► pp. 32 ff. DOI logo
Akita, Kimi
2020. Modality-specificity of iconicity. In Operationalizing Iconicity [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 17], ► pp. 4 ff. DOI logo
Akita, Kimi & Yo Matsumoto
2020. Chapter 5. A fine-grained analysis of manner salience. In Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions [Human Cognitive Processing, 69], ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Matsumoto, Yo & Kazuhiro Kawachi
2020. Introduction. Motion event descriptions in broader perspective. In Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions [Human Cognitive Processing, 69], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Høeg Müller, Henrik
2019. The determining role of manner in linguistic event framing. Langages N° 214:2 ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Kudrnáčová, Naděžda
2019. Contrastive semantics of human locomotion verbs. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17:1 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Kudrnáčová, Naděžda
2021. Contrastive semantics of human locomotion verbs. In Corpus Approaches to Language, Thought and Communication [Benjamins Current Topics, 119], ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.