Language-specific properties influence motion expression (Slobin 2004; Talmy 2000), but it is still debated whether they also influence non-verbal spatial cognition. We compare how English and French speakers perform three tasks involving motion events: non-verbal categorization based on cartoons during a dual task (articulatory suppression); verbal categorization involving target sentences; and descriptions of motion events. Descriptions show more manner expression in English and variation in both groups as a function of event properties. However, both groups frequently choose Path as categorization criterion, particularly in verbal categorization, but language effects do show that English speakers are more sensitive to event properties. Thus, typology has a strong impact on verbal cognition but also a partial influence on non-verbal cognition that must be taken into account in future research on the relation between language and thought.
Allen, S., Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., & Ishizuka, T.2007. Language-specific and universal influences in children's syntactic packaging of Manner and Path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition, 102(1), 16–48.
Aske, J.1989. Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 15, 1–14.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G.1974. Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. Vol. 8 (47–89). New York: Academic Press.
Blomberg, J., & Zlatev, J.2009. Linguistic relativity, mediation and the categorization of motion. In J. Zlatev, M. Andrén, M. Johansson Falck, & C. Lundmark (Eds.), Studies in language and cognition (46–61). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Bohnemeyer, J., Eisenbeiss, S., & Narasimhan, B.2001. Event triads. In S. C. Levinson, & N. J. Enfield (Eds.), ‘Manual’ for the field season 2001 (100–114). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Bowerman, M., & Choi, S.2003. Space under construction: Language-specific categorization in first language acquisition. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (387–427). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cadierno, T.2004. Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typological perspective. In M. Achard, & S. Niemeyer (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (13–49). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cadierno, T.2008. Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In P. Robinson, & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (239–274). London: Routledge.
Cadierno, T., & Lund, K.2004. Cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition: Motion events in a typological framework. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (139–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Choi, S., & Bowerman, M.1991. Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41(1–3), 83–121.
Choi, S., & Hattrup, K.2012. Relative contribution of cognition/perception and language on spatial categorization. Cognitive Science, 36, 102–129.
Engemann, H.2012. Motion event expression in bilingual first language acquisition. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Engemann, H., Hendriks, H., Hickmann, M., Soroli, E., & Vincent, C.2015. How language impacts memory of motion events in English and French. Cognitive Processing – International Quarterly of Cognitive Science 16(supplement 1), 209–213.
Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C.2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 429–448.
Filipović, L.2011. Speaking and remembering in one or two languages: Bilingual vs. monolingual lexicalization in memory for motion events. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(4), 466–485.
Gennari, S. P., Sloman, S. A., Malt, B. C., & Fitch, W. T.2002. Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83, 49–79.
Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C.1996. Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harr, A.-K.2012. The impact of language-specific factors in first language acquisition: The expression of motion in French and German. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hendriks, H., & Hickmann, M.2011. Expressing voluntary motion in a second language: English learners of French. In V. Cook, & B. Bassetti (Eds.), Language and bilingual cognition (315–339). New York: Psychology Press.
Hendriks, H., Hickmann, M., & Demagny, A.-C.2008. How English native speakers learn to express caused motion in English and French. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 27, 15–41.
Hermer-Vazquez, L., Spelke, E. S., & Katsnelson, A. S.1999. Sources of flexibility in human cognition: Dual task studies of space and language. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 3–36.
Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H., & Champaud, C.2009a. Typological constraints on motion in French and English child language. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, S. Ervin-Tripp, N. Budwig, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (209–224). New York: Psychology Press.
Hickmann, M., Taranne, P., & Bonnet, P.2009b. Motion in first language acquisition: Manner and Path in French and English child language. Journal of Child Language, 36(4), 705–741.
Hickmann, M., Soroli, E., Engemann, H., Hendriks, H., & Vincent, C.2014. Typological factors in the development of verbal and non-verbal spatial cognition: A comparison of French and English. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference in Cognitive Linguistics, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, UK, 29–31 July 2014.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.2009. Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & S. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (403–414). New York: Psychology Press.
Ji, Y.2009. The expression of voluntary and caused motion events in Chinese and in English: Typological and developmental perspectives. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Ji, Y., Hendriks, H., & Hickmann, M.2011a. The expression of caused motion events in Chinese and in English: Some typological issues. Linguistics, 49(5), 1041–1076.
Ji, Y., Hendriks, H., & Hickmann, M.2011b. Children’s expression of voluntary motion events in English and Chinese. Journal of Foreign Languages, 34(4), 2–20.
Lavie, N., Hirst, A., De Fockert, J., & Viding, E.2004. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(3), 339–354.
Levinson, S. C.2003. Space in language and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D.2006. Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lucy, J. A.1992. Language diversity and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D. B., & Levinson, S. C.2004. Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 108–114.
Newton, A. M., & De Villiers, J. G.2007. Thinking while talking: Adults fail nonverbal false-belief reasoning. Psychological Science, 18, 574–579.
Özçalışkan, Ş.2009. Learning to talk about spatial motion in language-specific ways. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, S. Ervin-Tripp, N. Budwig, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (263–276). New York: Psychology Press.
Özçalışkan, Ş.2015. Ways of crossing a spatial boundary in typologically distinct languages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 485–508.
Papafragou, A., Hulbert, J., & Trueswell, J.2008. Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 108, 155–184.
Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L.2002. Shake, rattle, ’n’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition, 84, 189–219.
Papafragou, A., & Selimis, S.2010. Event categorisation and language: A cross-linguistic study of motion. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 224–260.
Pourcel, S.2005. Relativism in the linguistic representation and cognitive conceptualization of motion events across verb-framed and satellite-framed languages. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Durham.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A.2002. E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
Slobin, D. I.1996. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slobin, D. I., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kopecka, A., & Majid, A.2014. Manners of human gait: A crosslinguistic event-naming study. Cognitive Linguistics, 25, 701–741.
Soroli, E.2011. Language and spatial cognition in French and in English: Crosslinguistic perspectives in aphasia. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Paris 8.
Soroli, E.2012. Variation in spatial language and cognition: Exploring visuo-spatial thinking and speaking cross-linguistically. Cognitive Processing – International Quarterly of Cognitive Science, 13(1), 333–337.
Soroli, E., & Hickmann, M.2010. Language and spatial representations in French and in English: Evidence from eye-movements. In G. Marotta, A. Lenci, L. Meini, & F. Rovai (Eds.), Space in language (581–597). Pisa: ETS.
Soroli, E., Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H., Engemann, H., & Vincent, C.2015. Language effects on spatial cognition? Cross-linguistic evidence and eye-tracking. Paper presented at NINJAL International Symposium: Typology and Cognition in Motion Event Descriptions. Tokyo, Japan, 24–25 January 2015.
Talmy, L.2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
von Stutterheim, C., & Nüse, R.2003. Processes of conceptualisation in language production: Language specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics, 41, 851–881.
Zhou, X., Chen, C., Zhang, H., Xue, G., & Dong, Q.2006. Neural substrates for forward and backward recitation of numbers and the alphabet: A close examination of the role of intraparietal sulcus and perisylvian areas. Brain Research, 1099(1), 109–120.
Zlatev, J., Blomberg, J., & David, C.2010. Translocation: Language and the categorization of experience. In V. Evans (Ed.), Language, cognition, and space: The state of the art and new directions (389–418). Sheffield, UK: Equinox.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Lesuisse, Mégane & Maarten Lemmens
2024. Looking differently at locative events: the cognitive impact of linguistic preferences. Language and Cognition 16:3 ► pp. 733 ff.
2023. Low-level visual processing of motion events as a window into language-specific effects on perception. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:1 ► pp. 61 ff.
Laws, Jacqueline, Anthony Attwood & Jeanine Treffers-Daller
2022. Unlearning the boundary-crossing constraint: processing instruction and the acquisition of motion event construal. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:4 ► pp. 1089 ff.
Lesuisse, Mégane
2022. Exploring the conceptualisation of locative events in French, English, and Dutch: Insights from eye-tracking on two memorisation tasks. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 10:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.