In this chapter we present new arguments for a conception of metonymy as a contingent, i.e. defeasible, inferential relation between a source and a target sense within the same conceptual frame. Some scholars have raised objections against our approach to metonymy, claiming that there exist entailment-based metonymies. We demonstrate that the “counterexamples” in support of this thesis are in fact not entailments but cancelable inferences based on encyclopedic knowledge. We develop an account of metonymy inspired by the Peircean concept of abduction, a mode of reasoning that is pervasive in both scientific and everyday inferencing. Finally, we propose a distinction between default and incongruence-based metonymies and point out some parallelisms between metonymies and Gricean conversational implicatures.
2006Abductive reasoning: Logical investigations into discovery and explanation (Synthese Library: Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science 30). Dordrecht: Springer.
Barcelona, A.
2000On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (Topics in English Linguistics 30) (31–58). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Barcelona, A.
2011Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus view (Human Cognitive Processing 28) (7–57). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Benczes, R., Barcelona, A., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
(Ed.)1955Philosophical writings of Peirce. New York: Dover Publications.
Carston, R.
2002Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
Croft, W.
2006On explaining metonymy: Comments on Peirsman and Geeraerts “Metonymy as a prototypical category”. Cognitive Linguistics, 17, 317–326.
Deutscher, G.
2002On the misuse of the notion of ‘abduction’ in linguistics. Journal of Linguistics, 38, 469–485.
Fraser, B.
1975Hedged performatives. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Speech acts (Syntax and Semantics 3) (187–210). New York: Academic Press.
Grady, J.
1997Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Grice, H. P.
1989Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.
Haser, V.
2005Metaphor, metonymy, and experientialist philosophy: Challenging cognitive semantics (Topics in English Linguistics 49). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Paul, H.
1970Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Hobbs, J. R.
2001Syntax and metonymy. In P. Bouillon & F. Busa (Eds.), The language of word meaning (290–311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holyoak, K. J., & Morrison, R. G.
2005Thinking and reasoning: A reader’s guide. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (1–9). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Honderich, T.
(Ed.)1995The Oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hurford, J. R., Heasley, B., & Smith, M. B.
2007Semantics: A coursebook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jakobson, R.
2002The metaphoric and metonymic poles. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (Cognitive Linguistics Research 20) (41–47). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Janda, L.
2014Metonymy and word-formation revisited. Cognitive Linguistics 25, 341–349.
2010Motivating grammatical and conceptual gender agreement in German. In H.-J. Schmid & S. Handl (Eds.), Cognitive foundations of linguistic usage patterns (Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 13) (171–194). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kövecses, Z.
2002Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G.
1998Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 37–77.
Lakoff, G.
1987Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
1999Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Book
Langacker, R.
2008Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levinson, S. C.
2000Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Littlemore, J.
2015Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D.
2009Intuitive and reflective inferences. In J. St. B. T. Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (140–170). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Musson, G., & Tietze, S.
2004Place and spaces: The role of metonymy in organizational talk. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1302–1323.
Nyrop, K.
1913Grammaire historique de la langue française. Vol. IV. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel, Nordsk Forlag.
Paavola, S.
2005Peircean abduction: Instinct or inference. Semiotica, 153, 131–154.
Panther, K.-U.
2003 Review of F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez and J. L. Otal Campo (2002). Metonymy, grammar, and communication (Colección Estudios de Lengua Inglesa 7). Albolote: Editorial Comares. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 276–288.
Panther, K.-U.
2005aInaugural lecture: Metonymic reasoning inside and outside language. In A. Makkai, W. J. Sullivan, & A. R. Lommel (Eds.), LACUS FORUM XXXI: Interconnections (13–32). Houston: The Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States.
Panther, K.-U.
2005bThe role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & S. Peña Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (Cognitive Linguistics Research 32) (353–386). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Panther, K.-U.
2006Metonymy as a usage event. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.). Cognitive Linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (Applications in Cognitive Linguistics 1) (147–185). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Panther, K.-U.
2009Grammatische versus konzeptuelle Kongruenz. Oder: Wann siegt das natürliche Geschlecht? In R. Brdar-Szabó, E. Knipf-Komlósi, & A. Péteri (Eds.), An der Grenze zwischen Grammatik und Pragmatik (Deutsche Sprachwissenschaft 3) (67–86). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Panther, K.-U.
2011Taking stock of figurative language and grammar: Results and prospects. Metaphorik.de, 21, 21–45.
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L.
1998A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 755–769.
2003aIntroduction: On the nature of conceptual metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & L. L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (Pragmatics & Beyond, New Series 113) (1–20). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2007Metonymy. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (236–263). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L.
2009Introduction: On figuration in grammar. In K.-U Panther, L. L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (Human Cognitive Processing 25) (1–44). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
1999Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (Human Cognitive Processing 4) (17–59). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Riemer, N.
2002When is a metonymy no longer a metonymy. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (Cognitive Linguistics Research 20) (379–406). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Robert, P.
et al.1992Le Petit Robert: Dictionnaire de la langue française. Paris: Robert.
Romero, A.
2012When whales became mammals: the scientific journey of cetaceans from fish to mammals in the history of science. In A. Romero & E. O. Keith (Eds.), New approaches to the study of marine mammals (4–30). Rijeka, Croatia: InTech.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Galera Masegosa, A.
2000The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (109–133). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruwet, N.
1975Synecdoques et métonymies. Poétique, 6, 371–388.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
1995Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Thagard, P.
2007Abductive inference: From philosophical analysis to neural mechanisms. In A. Feeney & E. Heit (Eds.), Inductive reasoning: Experimental, developmental, and computational approaches (226–247). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waag, A.
1901Bedeutungsentwicklung unseres Wortschatzes. Lahr i. B.: Moritz Schauenburg.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.