Part of
Conceptual Metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues
Edited by Olga Blanco-Carrión, Antonio Barcelona and Rossella Pannain
[Human Cognitive Processing 60] 2018
► pp. 161182
References
Alač, M., & Coulson, S.
2004The man, the key, or the car: Who or what is parked out back? Cognitive Science Online, 2, 21–34.Google Scholar
Barcelona, A.
2004Metonymy behind grammar: The motivation of the seemingly “irregular” grammatical behavior of English paragon names. In G. Radden & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation (357–384). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2011Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus view (7–57). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bierwiaczonek, B.
2013Metonymy in language, thought and brain. Sheffield & Bristol: Equinox.Google Scholar
Brdar, M., & Brdar Szabó, R.
2014Where does metonymy begin? Some comments on Janda (2011). Cognitive Linguistics 25(2), 313–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L. J.
1988The development of English aspectual systems: Aspectualizers and post-verbal particles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coulson, S., & Oakley, T.
2003Metonymy and conceptual blending. In K.-U. Panther & L. L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (51–79). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denroche, Ch.
2015Metonymy and language: A new theory of linguistic processing. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dirven, R.
1999Conversion as a conceptual metonymy of event schemata. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (275–287). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frisson, S., & Pickering, M. J.
1999The processing of metonymy: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 1366–1383.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr.
1994The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haser, V.
2005Metaphor, metonymy, and experientialist philosophy: Challenging cognitive semantics. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernández-Gomariz, I.
this volume. Analysis of metonymic triggers, metonymic chaining and patterns of interaction with metaphor and with other metonymies as part of the metonymy database in the Córdoba project.
Janda, L. A.
2011Metonymy in word-formation. Cognitive Linguistics 22(2), 359–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D.
2011Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
2009The neural theory of metaphor. [URL]
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
2008Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J.
2015Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. R.
1981Semiotic principles in semantic theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U.
2005The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & S. Peña Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (353–386). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L.L.
this volume. What kind of reasoning mode is metonymy?
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L.
2009Introduction: On figuration in grammar. In K.-U. Panther & L. L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (1–44). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirsman, Y., & Geeraerts, D.
2006Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics, 17, 269–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, G.
2009Generic reference in English: A metonymic and conceptual blending analysis. In K.-U Panther, L. L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (199–228). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z.
1999Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (17–59). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
2003The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (109–132). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, N. S.
1997Metaphor and metonymy. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance theory: Applications and implications (87–104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Strack, D.
2015Metonymic connections are not mapped: Theoretical and neurological evidence for “metonymic binding”. Paper presented at the 13th ICLC at Newcastle upon Tyne.
Sweep, J.
2011Metonymical transfers: The complex relation of metonymy and grammar. Linguistics in Amsterdam 4(1).Google Scholar
Warren, B.
1999Aspects of referential metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (121-135). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Barcelona, Antonio
2019. Chapter 2. The tripartite typology and the Córdoba Metonymy Database. In Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8],  pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Barnden, John A.
2022. Metonymy, reflexive hyperbole and broadly reflexive relationships. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Denroche, Charles
Elyamany, Nashwa & Maha SalahEldien Mohamed Hamed
Golubeva, Tatiana
Martynyuk, Alla & Olga Meleshchenko
Pannain, Rossella & Lucia di Pace
2022. Metonymy and the polysemy ofCovidin Italian. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1  pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Thomou, Paraskevi & Marilena Koutoulaki
2022. From usage patterns to meaning construction. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:2  pp. 305 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.