Part of
Evidence for Evidentiality
Edited by Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop and Gijs Mulder
[Human Cognitive Processing 61] 2018
► pp. 1943
Aikhenvald, A. Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. R., & Keenan, E. L.
1985Deixis. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic fieldwork vol. 3 (259–308). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, A., & Dixon, R. M. W.
(Eds.) 2003Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Eds.) 2013The grammar of knowledge: a cross-linguistic typology [Explorations in Linguistic Typology 7]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bendix, E. H.
1992The grammaticalization of responsibility and evidence: Interactional potential of evidential categories in Newari. In J. H. Hill & J. T. Irvine (Eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse (226–247). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bergqvist, H.
2012Epistemic marking in Ika (Arwako). Studies in Language, 36(1), 154–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017The role of sentence type in Ika (Arwako) egophoric marking. In S. Floyd, E. Norcliffe, & L. San Roque (Eds.), Egophoricity. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, B., & Nichols J.
2007Inflectional Morphology. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: vol. 3 grammatical categories and the lexicon (169–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, K.
2012Epistemic meaning: A crosslinguistic and functional cognitive study. [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 43]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1985Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creissels, D.
2008Person variation in Akhvakh verb morphology: functional motivation and origin of an uncommon pattern. STUF, 61(4), 309–325.Google Scholar
2009Language documentation and verb inflection typology: the case of Northern Akhvakh (Nakh-Daghestanian). Handout at Chronos 9, October 2–4, Paris.
Curnow, T. J.
2002Types of interaction between evidentials and first person subjects. Anthropological Linguistics, 44(2), 178–196.Google Scholar
2003Nonvolitionality expressed through evidentials. Studies in Language, 27(1), 39–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H.
1999Demonstratives: Form, function, and grammaticalization. [Typological Studies in Language 42]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
1986Self-Evidence and Ritual Speech. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Ed. by Wallace L. Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 313–336. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Eberhard, D.
2009Mamaindê grammar: A northern Nambikwara language and its cultural context. 2 volumes. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Floyd, S., Norcliffe, N., & San Roque, L.
(Eds.) 2017Egophoricity. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faller, M.
2002Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Goffman, E.
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, W. F.
1990Referential practice: Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2009Fieldwork on deixis. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(1), 10–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Evidentiality in social interaction. Pragmatics and Society, 3(2), 169–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, A.
1980Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct forms in Newari. In Trail R. (Ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics 7 (95–106). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, D.
2005Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar. Himalayan Linguistics, 5, 1–48.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, K., & Dall’Aglio Hattnher, M. M.
2015 “Four types of evidentiality in the native languages of Brazil. Linguistics, 53(3), 479–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, N. P.
1996Demonstratives in narrative discourse: A taxonomy of universal uses. In B. Fox (Ed.), Studies in anaphora (205–254). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, W. H.
1986The heterogeneity of evidentials in Makah. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic encoding of epistemology (3–28). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R.
1957Shifters and verbal categories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Dept. of Slavic Languages and Literatures. Reprinted in L. R. Waugh & M. Monville-Burston (Eds.) [1990] On language (386–392). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1922Language; its nature, development, and origin, London: Geroge Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
1994Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kockelman, P.
2004Stance and subjectivity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14, 127–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Review of “Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 22(2), E105–E118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Language, culture, and mind: Natural constructions and social kinds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landaburu, J.
1992La langue ika ou Arhuaco: Morphosyntaxe du verbe. Amerindia, 17, 1–30.Google Scholar
2000La lengua ika. In M. S. Gonzales de Peréz, & M. L. Rodrigues de Montes (Eds.), Lenguas indígenas de Colombia: Una visión descriptíva (733–748). Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
Loughnane, R.
2010A Grammar of Oksapmin. PhD thesis. University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Lyons, J.
1977Semantics vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, M.
1999The Languages of Native North America (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mushin, I.
2001Evidentiality and epistemological stance: Narrative retelling, [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 87]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oswalt R. L.
1986The evidential system of Kashaya. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology (29–45). Norwood N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Ramirez, H.
1997A fala Tukano dos Ye’pâ-Masa, vol. 1: Gramática. Manaus: Inspetoria Salesiana Missionária da Amazônia & Centro “Iauareté” de Documentação Etnográfica e Missionária.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H.
1947Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
Rule, W. M.
1977A comparative study of the Foe, Huli, and Pole languages of Papua New Guinea, [Oceania Linguistic Monographs 20]. Sydney: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
San Roque, L.
2008An introduction to Duna grammar. Canberra: The Australian National University dissertation.Google Scholar
San Roque, L., & Loughnane, R.
2012Evidentiality in Highland New Guinea. Linguistic Typology 16, 111–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
2006Historical aspects of modality. In W. Frawley, (Ed.), The Expression of Modality (107–139). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Willett, T. L.
1988A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language, 12(1): 51–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991A reference grammar of Southeastern Tepehuan. SIL publications in Linguistics 100. Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Bergqvist, Henrik
2020. Swedish modal particles as markers of engagement: Evidence from distribution and frequency. Folia Linguistica 54:2  pp. 469 ff. DOI logo
Bergqvist, Henrik
2023. Seeing and knowing. Functions of Language 30:2  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Bergqvist, Henrik & Dominique Knuchel
2019. Explorations of Engagement: Introduction. Open Linguistics 5:1  pp. 650 ff. DOI logo
Kiesling, Scott F.
2022. Stance and Stancetaking. Annual Review of Linguistics 8:1  pp. 409 ff. DOI logo
Mélac, Eric
2024. The links between evidentiality, modality, and grammaticalization. Studies in Language 48:3  pp. 513 ff. DOI logo
San Roque, Lila
2019. Evidentiality. Annual Review of Anthropology 48:1  pp. 353 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.