Cover not available
Part of
Evidence for Evidentiality
Edited by Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop and Gijs Mulder
[Human Cognitive Processing 61] 2018
► pp. 99–120

Chapter 4
(Yo) creo que as a marker of evidentiality and epistemic modality

Evidence from Twitter

| Radboud University Nijmegen
This chapter surveys the use of the first person present of the cognitive verb creer ‘believe’ in contemporary Peninsular Spanish. It is based on data that were gathered from Twitter. The different functions of creo ‘I believe’ are closely related to a limited set of syntactic patterns. Creo with complementizer que proves to be a highly frequent and prolific marker of evidentiality, epistemic modality and related functions. After a detailed description of these functions, I focus on creo que with and without subject personal pronoun yo. While creo que fits all functions equally well, the use of yo creo que is more restricted to speaker-oriented, subjective functions.
Keywords: cognitive verb, creer , first person, Spanish, subject pronoun
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Epistemic modality and evidentiality: theory and practice
  • 3.Twitter language
  • 4. Pienso and me parece
  • 5. Creo
    • 5.1 (Yo) creo que
    • 5.2 Creo que or yo creo que
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.61.05mul
References (56)
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aijón Oliva, M. Á., & Serrano, M. J. 2010. El hablante en su discurso: expresión y omisión del sujeto de creo . Oralia, 13, 7–38.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, J., & Plungian, V. A. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 2, 79–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, R. E., & San José, M. Á. 2010. A reference grammar of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyd, D. 2009. Twitter: “pointless babble” or peripheral awareness+social grooming? <[URL]>
Boye, K. 2012. Epistemic meaning: A crosslinguistic and functional-cognitive study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, J., & Benjamin, C. 2013. A new reference grammar of modern Spanish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cappelli, G. 2007. “I reckon I know how Leonardo da Vinci must have felt…” Epistemicity, evidentiality and English verbs of cognitive attitude. Pari: Pari Publishing.Google Scholar
2008. Antonymy and verbs of cognitive attitude: When know is the opposite of think and believe . In M. Bertuccelli Papi, A. Bertacca, & S. Bruti (Eds.), Threads in the complex fabric of language (529–546). Pisa, Felici Editore.Google Scholar
de Cock, B. 2014. Profiling discourse participants: forms and functions in Spanish conversation and debates. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornillie, B. 2007. Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Spanish (semi-)auxiliaries: a cognitive-functional approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cornillie, B., & Pietrandrea, P. 2012. Modality at work. Cognitive, interactional and textual functions of modal markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(15), 2109–2115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. 2002. Corpus del español: 100 million words, 1200s–1900s. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Davidson, B. 1996. ‘Pragmatic weight’ and Spanish subject pronouns: The pragmatic and discourse uses of ‘tú’ and ‘yo’ in spoken Madrid Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(4), 543–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, S. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), 359–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enríquez, E. V. 1984. El pronombre personal sujeto en la lengua española hablada en Madrid. Madrid: CSIC.Google Scholar
Fraser, B. 1980. Conversational mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics, 4(4), 341–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Pragmatic competence: the case of hedging. In G. Kaltenböck, W. Mihatsch, & S. Schneider (Eds.), New approaches to hedging (15–34). Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. 1994. The pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional and typological aspects of inversion. In T. Givón (Ed.), Voice and inversion (3–46). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gómez Torrego, L. 1988. Perífrasis verbales: sintáxis, semántica y estilística. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: speech acts (41–59). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
de Haan, F. 1999. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 18, 83–101.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, K., & Dall’Aglio Hattnher, M. M. 2015. Four types of evidentiality in the native languages of Brazil. Linguistics, 53(3), 479–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hennemann, A. 2012. The epistemic and evidential use of Spanish modal adverbs and verbs of cognitive attitude. Folia linguistica, 46(1), 133–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. A context-sensitive and functional approach to evidentiality in Spanish or why evidentiality needs a superordinate category. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Hoop, H., Foolen, A., Mulder, G., & van Mulken, V. (this volume). I think and I believe: Evidential expressions in Dutch.
Jucker, A. H., & Dürscheid, C. 2012. The linguistics of keyboard-to-screen communication. A new terminological framework. Linguistik online 56(6). <[URL]>Google Scholar
Kattán-Ibarra, J., & Howkins, A. 2014. Spanish grammar in context. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1972. Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. In: P. M. Peranteau, J. N. Levi, & G. C. Phares (Eds.), Papers from the eighth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (183–228). Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Landone, E. 2012. Discourse markers and politeness in a digital forum in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(13), 1799–1820. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lazard, G. 2001. On the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), 359–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipski, J. M. 2002. Subject pronoun usage among Spanish dialects. Unpublished manuscript. <[URL]>
Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics: Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1995. Linguistic semantics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulder, G. 2017. When feeling is thinking: A lexical-semantic analysis of evidential and epistemic predicates in Spanish. In J. I. Marín Arrese, G. Haβler, & M. Carretero (Eds.), Evidentiality revisited: Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives (105–121). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J. 2001. Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. Notions of (inter)subjectivity. English Text Construction, 5(1), 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Subjectivity: Between discourse and conceptualization. Journal of Pragmatics, 86, 106–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, R. 2012. The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: The role of hashtags. Discourse and Communication, 6(2), 181–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Saying ‘sorry’: Corporate apologies posted on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics, 62, 30–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, F. R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plungian, V. 2010. Types of verbal evidentiality: An overview. In G. Diewald, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages (15–59). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Posio, P. 2011. Spanish subject pronoun usage and verb semantics revisited: First and second person singular subject pronouns and focusing of attention in spoken Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 777–798. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. The functions of postverbal pronominal subjects in spoken Peninsular Spanish and European Portuguese. Studies in Hispanic & Lusophone Linguistics, 5(1), 149–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. The expression of first-person-singular subjects in spoken Peninsular Spanish and European Portuguese: Semantic roles and formulaic sequences. Folia Linguistica, 47(1), 253–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Subject expression in grammaticalizing constructions: The case of creo and ancho ‘I think’ in Spanish and Portuguese. Journal of Pragmatics, 63, 5–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Real Academia Española: Banco de datos (CREA). Corpus de referencia del español actual. <[URL]>
Rodríguez Louro, C., & Harris, T. 2013. Evolution with an attitude: The grammaticalisation of epistemic/evidential verbs in Australian English. English Language & Linguistics, 17, 415–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saeger, B. 2007. Usos y significados del verbo ‘creer’. In I. Castellón Masalles, & A. Fernández Montraveta (Eds.), Perspectivas de análisis de la unidad verbal (81–92). Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
de Schepper, K., & de Hoop, H. 2012. Construction-dependent person hierarchies. In W. Abraham, & E. Leiss (Eds.), Modality and Theory of Mind across languages (383–403). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. 2002. ‘Object complements’ and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language, 26(1), 125–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Travis, C. E., & Torres Cacoullos, R. 2012. What do subject pronouns do in discourse? Cognitive, mechanical and constructional factors in variation. Cognitive Linguistics, 23, 711–748. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, R. D. 2001. An introduction to syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willett, T. 1988. A crosslinguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Studies in Language, 12(1), 51–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Martínez Vázquez, Montserrat
2023. Chapter 10. A constructional analysis of digo yo in peninsular Spanish. In Constructions in Spanish [Constructional Approaches to Language, 34], ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Mulder, Gijs
2017. When feeling is thinking. In Evidentiality Revisited [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271], ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.