Part of
Perspectives on Abstract Concepts: Cognition, language and communication
Edited by Marianna Bolognesi and Gerard J. Steen
[Human Cognitive Processing 65] 2019
► pp. 113
Andrews, M., Vigliocco, G., & Vinson, D.
2009Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. Psychological Review 116, 463–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asmuth, J., & Gentner, D.
2017Relational categories are more mutable than entity categories. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 70(10), 2007–2025. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W.
2016On staying grounded and avoiding quixotic dead ends. Psychonomic Bulletin Review 23, 1122–1142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, K. W., & Wilson, C. D.
2008Language and simulations in conceptual processing. In M. de Vega,  A. M. Glenberg, and A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols, embodiment and meaning (245–283). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L.
2009Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex 19(12), 2767–2796. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolognesi, M., & Steen, G.
2018aAbstract Concepts: Structure, Processing and Modeling. Editors’ introduction. Topics in Cognitive Science 10(3), 490–500.Google Scholar
(Eds.) 2018bAbstract Concepts: Structure, Processing and Modeling. Topics in Cognitive Science 10(3).Google Scholar
Borghi, A. M., & Cimatti, F.
2009Words as tools and the problem of abstract words meanings. In N. Taatgen, & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the cognitive science society, 2304–2309.Google Scholar
Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F
2014 Words as Social Tools: An Embodied View on Abstract Concepts . Berlin; New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, L.
2001Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology 43, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V.
2014Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods 46, 3, 904–911. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Vega, M., Glenberg,  A. M., & Graesser, A. C.
(Eds.) 2008Symbols, embodiment and meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donald, M
1991Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition. Harvard: University Press.Google Scholar
Dove, G.
2016Three symbol ungrounding problems: abstract concepts and the future of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin Review 23, 1109–1121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D.
1982Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. A. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language development: Vol. 2. Language, thought, and culture (301–334). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goetz, E. T., Sadoski, M., Stricker, A. G., White, T. S., & Wang, Z.
2007The role of imagery in the production of written definitions. Reading Psychology 28, 241–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B.
2007Topics in semantic representation. Psychological Review 114, 211–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickok, G. & Mahon, B. Z.
2016Arguments about the nature of concepts: Symbols, embodiment, and beyond. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23, 941–958. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, P.
2016The meaning of “life” and other abstract words: Insights from neuropsychology. Journal of Neuropsychology 10(2), 317–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, P., Jones, R. W., & Lambon Ralph, M. A.
2013Be concrete to be comprehended: Consistent imageability effects in semantic dementia for nouns, verbs, synonyms and associates. Cortex 49, 1206–1218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferies, E., Frankish, C., & Lambon Ralph, M. A.
2006Lexical and semantic binding in verbal short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language 54, 81–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. N., Johns, B. T., & Recchia, G.
2012The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 66, 115–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kounios, J., & Holcomb, P. J.
1994Concreteness effects in semantic processing – ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition 20, 804–823. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T.
1997A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 104, 211–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, M.
2018Knowing the meaning of a word by the linguistic and perceptual company it keeps. Topics in Cognitive Science 10(3) 573–589. DOI logo.Google Scholar
2011Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science 3, 273–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lund, K., & Burgess, C.
1996Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical cooccurrence. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers 28, 203–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marconi, D.
1997Lexical Competence. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McDonough, C., Song, L., Pasek, K. H., Golinkoff, R. M., & Lannon, R
2012An image is worth a thousand words: Why nouns tend to dominate verbs in early word learning. Developmental Science 14(2), 181–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pecher, D.
2018Curb your embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science 10(3), 501–517.Google Scholar
Pecher, D., Boot, I., & Van Dantzig, S.
2011Abstract concepts: Sensory-motor grounding, metaphors, and beyond. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation Vol. 54. (217–248). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Recchia, G., & Jones, M. N.
2012The semantic richness of abstract concepts. Frontiers in human neuroscience 6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romani, C., McAlpine, S., & Martin, R. C.
2008Concreteness effects in different tasks: Implications for models of short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61, 292–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J.
1983Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 9(1), 82–102.Google Scholar
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Akin, C., & Luh, W. M.
1992Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Memory and Cognition 20, 96–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strain, E., Patterson, K., & Seidenberg, M. S.
1995Semantic effects in single-word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 21, 1140–1154.Google Scholar
Tyler, L. K., Voice, J. K., & Moss, H. E.
2000The interaction of meaning and sound in spoken word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 7, 320–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Norbury, C. & Ponari, M.
2017How do young children learn abstract concepts? – Final public report . Project report. Nuffield foundation.Google Scholar
Wiemer-Hastings, K., & Xu, X.
2005Content differences for abstract and concrete concepts. Cognitive Science 29, 719–736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winawer, J, Witthoft, N, Frank, MC, Wu, L, Wade, A, & Boroditsky, L.
2007Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 104, 7780–7785. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J.
2008The Co-Evolution of Intersubjectivity and Bodily Mimesis. In J., Zlatev, Racine, T. P., Sinha, C., and Itkonen, E. (Eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity (215–244). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar