Cover not available
Part of
The Semantics of Dynamic Space in French: Descriptive, experimental and formal studies on motion expression
Edited by Michel Aurnague and Dejan Stosic
[Human Cognitive Processing 66] 2019
► pp. 289–319

Structure of French expression of motion

Gesture-speech relation, between-language comparison and developmental perspective

| CLLE, Université de Toulouse, CNRS & UT2J, France
| CLLE, Université de Toulouse, CNRS & UT2J, France
This chapter contributes to the present discussion about the expression of motion in French by presenting a psycholinguistic study that focuses on how information about motion is structured not only in speech but also in co-speech gesture. Interested in developmental and cross-linguistic perspectives, we included adults as well as 5- and 10-year-old children and compared French with a typologically different and less commonly studied language – Czech. Using data from narrations of short video clips featuring various motion events, we found that, in French, gestural expression of motion is organized more similarly to verbal expression of motion than in Czech. We also observed an age-related increasing tendency to include more information about motion into fewer clauses and gestural strokes.
Keywords: motion, gesture, speech, French, Czech, development
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Gesture-speech relation
    • 2.1Gesture, language, and speech
    • 2.2Gesturing, speaking, and thinking
    • 2.3Impact of language and age
  • 3.Verbal and gestural expression of motion
    • 3.1Speaking about motion in different languages
    • 3.2Interest of gesture in motion research
    • 3.3Gesturing about motion in different languages
    • 3.4Gesturing about motion in children
  • 4.The present study
    • 4.1Content and structure of expression of motion in French and Czech
    • 4.2Design and hypotheses
    • 4.3Participants, procedure, and materials
    • 4.4Coding
      • 4.4.1Coding of speech
      • 4.4.2Coding of gesture
      • 4.4.3Coding of gesture-speech relation
    • 4.5Results
      • 4.5.1Results for speech
      • 4.5.2Results for gesture
      • 4.5.3Results for gesture-speech relation
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Discussion of speech results
      • 5.1.1Impact of language type
      • 5.1.2Impact of age
    • 5.2Discussion of gesture results
      • 5.2.1Impact of language type
      • 5.2.2Impact of age
    • 5.3Discussion of gesture-speech results
      • 5.3.1Impact of language type
      • 5.3.2Impact of age
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.66.08fib
References (46)
References
Alibali, M. W., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1993). Gesture–speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning: What the hands reveal about a child’s state of mind. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 468–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allen, S., Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., Ishizuka, T., & Fujii, M. (2007). Language-specific and universal influences in children’s packaging of manner and path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition, 102, 16–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Argyle, M. (1972). Non-verbal communication in human social interaction. In R. Hinde (Ed.). Nonverbal communication (pp. 243–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aurnague, M. (2011). How motion verbs are spatial: The spatial foundations of intransitive motion verbs in French. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 34(1), 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S., Olver, R. R., & Greenfield, P. M. (1966). Studies in cognitive growth. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Capirci, O., Contaldo, A., Caselli, M. C, & Volterra, V. (2005). From action to language through gesture: A longitudinal perspective. Gesture, 5(1–2), 155–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R., (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Condon, W. C., & Ogston, R. (1967). A segmentation of behavior. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 5, 221–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The Repertoire of nonverbal behavior categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fibigerova, K. (2012). The impact of language on development of verbal and gestural expression of motion: Comparison between different-aged Czech and French. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Toulouse: Université Toulouse 2.Google Scholar
Fibigerova, K., & Guidetti, M. (2018). The impact of language on gesture in descriptions of voluntary motion in French and Czech adults and children. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 9(1), 99–134.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
Google Scholar
Fibigerova, K., Guidetti, M., & Šulová, L. (2012). Verbal and gestural expression of motion in French and Czech. In L. Filipović & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time across languages and cultures II.: Language, culture and cognition (pp. 251–268). Amsterdam &Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guidetti, M., Fibigerova, K., & Colletta, J. M. (2014). Gestures and multimodal development: Some key issues for child language acquisition. In M. Seyfeddinipur & M. Gullberg (Eds.), From gesture in conversation to visible utterance in action (pp. 351–370). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M., Hendrix, H., & Hickmann, M. (2008). Learning to talk and gesture about motion in French. First Language, 28(2), 200–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hijazo-Gascón, A., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013). Same family, different paths: Intratypological differences in three Romance languages. In J. Goschler & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (pp. 39–54). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M. (2006). The relativity of motion in first language acquisition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 281–308). Amsterdam & Philadephia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H., & Gullberg, M. (2011). Developmental perspectives on the expression of motion in speech and gesture: A comparison of French and English. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 2(1). 129–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hrstková, K. (2007). Czech prefixed verbs in a valency lexicon. In J. Šafránková & J. Pavlů (Eds.), WDS’07 Proceedings of Contributed Papers, Part I: Mathematics and Computer Sciences (pp. 131–137). Prague: Matfyzpress.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kita, S. (2000.) How representational gestures help speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and Gesture (pp. 162–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, A. (2006). The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: Typological perspectives. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kunene Nicolas, R., Guidetti, M., & Colletta, J. M. (2016). A cross-linguistic study of the development of gesture and speech in Zulu and French oral narratives. Journal of Child Language, 4, 1–27.Google Scholar
Latkowska, J. (2011). On the representations of motion events: Perspectives from L2 research. In M. Pawlak & J. Bielak (Eds.), New perspectives in language, discourse and translation studies (pp. 91–102). Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D. (Eds.). (2006). Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2005). Gesture and Thought. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). How language began: Gesture and speech in evolution. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D., & Duncan, S. (2000). Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 141–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nespoulous, J. L., & Lecours, A. R. (1986). Gestures: Nature and function. In J. L. Nespoulous, P. Perron, & A. R. Lecours (Eds.), The biological foundations of gestures: Motor and semiotic aspects (pp. 49–62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., & Ishizuka, T. (2008). Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: Motion events in English and Turkish. Developmental Psychology, 44(4), 1040–1054. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Furman, R., & Brown, A. (2005). How does linguistic framing of events influence co-speech gestures?: Insights from cross-linguistic variations and similarities. Gesture, 5, 215–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paivio, A. 1986. Mental representation: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L. (2002). Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition, 84, 189–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1966). La psychologie de l’enfant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Pokorný, J. (2010). Lingvistická antropologie: Jazyk, mysl, kultura. Prague: Grada Publishing.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. (1989). Cognitive Economy: The economic dimension of the theory of knowledge. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch, & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (2000). Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeier, & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (pp. 107–138). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Stromqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–257). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2006). What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 59–81). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical form. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (vol. 3): Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2000). Towards a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Poulin, Maud, Cédric Masclet & Jean-François Boujut
2024. Investigating the effects of spatial augmented reality on user participation in co-design sessions: A case study. Computers in Industry 154 ► pp. 104023 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.