Cover not available
Part of
Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions
Edited by Yo Matsumoto and Kazuhiro Kawachi
[Human Cognitive Processing 69] 2020
► pp. 181–204

Chapter 6
Attraction of attention in perceived motion events weighed against typology and cognitive cost

An experimental study of French

| Kyoto University
This chapter explores construction types and the frequency of the use of optional syntactic elements in French motion descriptions. In Talmy’s typology on Satellite- vs. Verb-framed languages, French is characterized as using the construction type of verb-framed languages for motion events, and according to his principles on the correlation between the fore- and backgroundedness of semantic components of motion and the cognitive cost of expressing them, manner and other concepts are expected to occur less frequently in foregrounded positions outside of the main verb than in backgrounded position in the main verb. This chapter shows, through an experimental method, that facts in French are more complex, and that the attraction of attention in perceived motion events has an impact on the choice of construction types and motivates manner and deixis to be expressed more frequently in optional syntactic elements under certain circumstances than Talmy’s principles would predict.
Keywords: foregrounding and backgrounding, frequency, main verb, optional syntactic elements
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.French motion event descriptions
    • 2.1Constructional variation in French motion descriptions
    • 2.2Talmy’s principles and the different frequencies of optional syntactic elements
  • 3.Experiment and analyses
    • 3.1Method
    • 3.2Results
      • 3.2.1Expressions of path
      • 3.2.2Expressions of deixis
      • 3.2.3Expressions of manner
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Constructional variation
    • 4.2Different frequencies of the main verb and optional syntactic elements
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 11 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.69.06mor
References (25)
References
Aske, J. 1989. Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1–14.Google Scholar
Aurnague, M. 2008. Qu’est-ce qu’un verbe de déplacement? Critères spatiaux pour une classification des verbes de déplacement intransitifs du français. In J. Durand, B. Habert, & B. Lacks (Eds.), Actes du Congrès mondial de linguistique française 08’ (1905–1917). Les Ulis: EDP Sciences.Google Scholar
Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, S. W. 2010. The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 46, 331–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blomberg, J. 2014. Motion in language and experience: Actual and non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai. Ph.D. dissertation, Lund University.Google Scholar
Cummins, S. 1996. Movement and direction in French and English. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 15(1), 31–54.Google Scholar
Fong, V., & Poulin, C. 1998. Locating linguistic variation in semantic templates. In J-P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition (29–39). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Huang, S., & Tanangkingsing, M. 2005. Reference to motion events in six Western Austronesian languages: Towards a semantic typology. Oceanic Linguistics 44(2), 307–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2004. Language typologies in our language use: The case of Basque motion events in adult oral narratives. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(3), 317–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (403–414). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Kopecka, A. 2004. Étude typologique de l’expression de l’espace: Localisation et déplacement en français et en polonais. Thèse de doctorat, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France.Google Scholar
2006. The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: Typological perspectives. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (83–101). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. 2003. Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In S. Chiba et al. (Eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A Festschrift for Masaru Kajita (403–417). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
2017. Idoo hyoogen no ruikei ni kansuru kadai [Problems in the typology of motion expressions]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (1–24). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y., Akita, K., & Takahashi, K. 2017. The functional nature of deictic verbs and the coding patterns of Deixis: An experimental study in English, Japanese, and Thai. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion and space across languages and applications (95–122). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morita, T. 2009. La catégorisation des verbes de déplacement en japonais et en français. Thèse de doctorat, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris, France.Google Scholar
2011. Intratypological variation in motion events in Japanese and French: Manner and deixis expressions as parameters for cross-linguistics comparison. Cognitextes, 6 [[URL]]. DOI logo
submitted. What does deixis tell us about motion typology? Linguistic or cultural variations of speaker’s relations to perceived physical events.
Slobin, D. I. 1996. Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (195–233). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2000. Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeier, & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (107–138). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2006. What makes manner of motion salient?: Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (59–81). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sugiyama, Y. 2005. Not all verb-framed languages are created equal: The case of Japanese. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 299–310.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 480–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. 2: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J. 2007. Spatial semantics. In H. Cuyckens & D. Geeraerts (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (318–350). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Morita, Takahiro
2022. Chapter 2. What does deixis tell us about motion typology?. In Neglected Aspects of Motion-Event Description [Human Cognitive Processing, 72], ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.