Chapter 4
Dual processing in a functional-cognitive theory of grammar and its neurocognitive basis
Functional-cognitive linguists are typically more interested in what is shared between grammar and other aspects of language than in what is special about grammar. Construction grammar as the currently most prominent functional-cognitive theory of grammar explicitly downplays the grammar-lexicon distinction and suggests a model based on the notion of ‘constructicon’ as a unified inventory of linguistic expressions. In a neurocognitive perspective, this goes naturally with the idea of a single processing mechanism. Neurolinguistic evidence does not support this extreme position, however, but rather suggests a significant difference between lexical and grammatical processing. There is thus a need for a more well-developed functional-cognitive theory of the neurocognitive underpinning of the grammar-lexicon distinction. In this chapter we present a theory of the specific nature of grammar, which integrates three recent theories: a usage-based linguistic theory of the grammar-lexicon distinction (Boye & Harder 2012), a theory of the distinction between declarative and procedural memory (Ullman 2001, 2004), and a theory of brain organization (Mogensen 2011).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Construction grammar and the distinction between lexicon and grammar
- 3.Our proposal: Secondary prominence and dependency
- 4.Modularity vs. parallel distributed processing
- 5.A neurocognitive framework: The REF model
- 6.Two aspects of the language ability: The ability to retrieve from the cognitive store – and the ability to combine retrieved items
- 7.Grammar in a differentiated spectrum of ‘dualities’
- 8.Summary and conclusions
-
Note
-
References
References (48)
References
Bates, E. 1999. Plasticity, localization and language development. In S. Broman, & J. M. Fletcher (Eds.), The changing nervous system: Neurobehavioral consequences of early brain disorders (214–253). New York: Oxford University Press.
Berwick, R. C., & Chomsky, N. 2016. Why Only Us. Language and evolution. Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press.
Bock, K. 1987. An effect of the accessibility of word forms on sentence structures. Journal of memory and language 26(2), 119–137.
Boye, K., & Harder, P. 2012. A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1), 1–44.
Boye, K., & Bastiaanse, R. 2018. Grammatical versus lexical words in theory and aphasia: Integrating linguistics and neurolinguistics. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3(1), 29.
Bundesen, C. 1990. A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523–547.
Christensen, M. H., Vinther, N. M., Kristensen, L. B., & Boye, K. (Under revision). Grammar as a backgrounder in sentence processing.
Croft, W. 2007. Construction Grammar. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (463–508). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Curtiss, S. 2013. Revisiting modularity: Using language as a window to the mind. In M. Piatelli Palmarini & R. C. Berwick (Eds.), Rich languages from poor inputs (68–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dabrowska, Ewa. 2004. Rules or schemas? Evidence from Polish. Language and Cognitive Processes 19(2), 225–271.
Damasio, A. R. 1992. Aphasia. The New England Journal of Medicine, 326(8), 531–539.
Danelli, L., Cossu, G., Berlingeri, M., Bottini, G., Sberna, M., & Paulesu, E. 2013. Is a lone right hemisphere enough? Neurolinguistic architecture in a case with a very early left hemispherectomy. Neurocase 19(3), 209–231.
Ellis, N. C. 2007. The weak interface, consciousness, and form-focused instruction: mind the doors. In S. Fotos & H. Nassaji (Eds.), Form-focused Instruction and Teacher Education. Studies in honour of Rod Ellis (17–34). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., & D’Ausilio, A. 2009. Broca’s Area in Language, Action, and Music. Ann.NYAcad.Sci, 1169, 448–458.
Garrett, M. F. 1975. The analysis of sentence production. In G. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (133–177). New York: Academic Press.
Harder, P. 2010. Meaning in Mind and Society. A Functional Contribution to the Social Turn in Cognitive Linguistics. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 41). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hengeveld, K., & J. L. Mackenzie. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: University Press.
Ibbotson, P., & Tomasello, M. 2016. Evidence Rebuts Chomsky’s Theory of Language Learning. Scientific American, 7 September, 2016.
Ishkhanyan, B., Sahraoui, H., Harder, P., Mogensen, J., & Boye, K. 2017. Grammatical and lexical pronoun dissociation in French speakers with agrammatic aphasia: A usage-based account and REF-based hypothesis. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 44, 1–16.
Ishkhanyan, B., Boye, K. & Mogensen, J. 2019. The meeting point: Where language production and working memory share resources. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 48(1), 61–79.
Krifka, M. 2007. Functional similarities between bimanual coordination and topic/comment structure. In S. Ishihara, S. Jannedy, & A. Schwarz (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies on information structure (ISIS) 8 (Working Papers of the SFB 632) (61–96). Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol 1, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA. Stanford University Press.
Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Martínez-Ferreiro, S., Ishkhanyan, B., Rosell-Clarí, V., & Boye, K. 2017. Grammatical verbs in Spanish-speaking individuals with aphasia. Studies in Language and Mind, 2, 175–209.
Martínez-Ferreiro, S., Ishkhanyan, B., Rosell-Clarí, V., & Boye, K. 2019. Prepositions and pronouns in connected discourse of individuals with aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 33(6), 497–517.
McClelland, J. L., & Patterson, K. 2002. Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: What does the evidence rule out? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(11), 465–472.
Messerschmidt, M., Boye, K., Overmark, M. M., Kristensen, S. T., & Harder, P. 2018. Sondringen mellem grammatiske og leksikalske præpositioner. [The distinction between grammatical and lexical prepositions]. Ny forskning i grammatik, 25, 89–106.
Michel Lange, V., Messerschmidt, M., Harder, P., Siebner, H. R., & Boye, K. 2017. Planning and production of grammatical and lexical verbs in multi-word messages. PLoS ONE, 12.11. e0186685.
Michel Lange, V., Messerschmidt, M., & Boye, K. 2018. Contrasting grammatical and lexical determiners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47, 467.
Mogensen, J. 2011. Almost unlimited potentials of a limited neural plasticity: Levels of plasticity in development and reorganization of the injured brain. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18, 13–45.
Mogensen, J. 2014. Reorganization of Elementary Functions (REF) after brain injury and in the intact brain: A novel understanding of neurocognitive organization and reorganization. In J. Costa, & E. Villalba (Eds.), Horizons in neuroscience research, Vol. 15 (99–140). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Nevat, M., Ullman, M. T., Eviatar, Z., & Bitan, T. (submitted). The neural bases of the learning and generalization of morphological inflection. Neuropsychologia.
Pinker, S. 1999. Words and Rules. The ingredients of language. New York. Basic Books.
Pinker, S., & Prince, A. 1988. On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73–193.
Pulvermüller, F., Capelle, B., & Shtyrov, Y. 2013. Brain basis of meaning, words, constructions, and grammar. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford Handbooks Online,
Rosenberg, B., Zurif, E., Brownell, H., Garrett, M., & Bradley, D. 1985. Grammatical class effects in relation to normal and aphasic sentence processing. Brain and Language 26(2), 287–303.
Rumelhart, D., & McClelland, J. 1986. Parallel distributed processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sidtis, J. J., D. V. L. Sidtis, V. Dhawan and D. Eidelberg. 2018. Switching Language Modes: Complementary Brain Patterns for Formulaic and Propositional Language. Brain Connectivity 8(3): 189–196.
Sperber, D., & D. Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Trousdale, G. 2014. On the relationship between grammaticalization and constructionalization. Folia Linguistica, 48, 557–577.
Ullman, M., Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hickok, G., Growdon, J. H., Koroshetz, W. J., & Pinker, S. 1997. A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 289–299.
Ullman, M. 2001. The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: the declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4(2), 105–122.
Ullman, M. 2004. Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative-procedural model. Cognition 92(1), 231–270.
Ullman, M. T. 2016. The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiological model of language learning, knowledge and use. In G. Hickok, & S. A. Small (Eds.). The neurobiology of language (953–968). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Van Lancker-Sidtis, D., A. R. McIntosh and S. Grafton. 2003. PET activation studies comparing two speech tasks widely used in surgical mapping. Brain and Language 85, 245–261.
Van Lancker Sidtis, D. 2012. Formulaic Language and Language Disorders. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 62–80.
Van Valin, R. 1993. A synopsis of Role and Reference Grammar. In R. Van Valin (Ed.), Advances in Role and Reference Grammar (1–164). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Vinther, N. M., Boye, K., & Kristensen, L. B. 2014. Grammatikken i baggrunden: Opmærksomhed under læsning [Grammar in the background: Attention in reading]. NyS, 47, 99–139.