Part of
Analogy and Contrast in Language: Perspectives from Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by Karolina Krawczak, Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk and Marcin Grygiel
[Human Cognitive Processing 73] 2022
► pp. 112
Blevins, J. P., & Blevins, J.
2009Introduction: Analogy in grammar. In J. P. Blevins, & J. Blevins (Eds.), Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition (1–12). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J.
2006From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Saussure, F.
1959Course in general linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
2010Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Kurtz, K. J.
2006Relations, objects, and the composition of analogies. Cognitive Science, 30, 609–642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glynn, D.
2014Polysemy and synonymy: Cognitive theory and corpus method. In D. Glynn, & J. Robinson (Eds.), Corpus Methods for Semantics. Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy (7–38). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofstadter, D. R.
2001Epilogue: Analogy as the core of cognition. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (499–538). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Holyoak, K. J., Gentner, D., & Kokinov, B. N.
2001Introduction. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. K. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (1–19). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kokinov, B., & French, R.
2003Computational models of analogy-making. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (113–118). London: Nature Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2. Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1999Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
This volume. What could be more fundamental?
Markman, A. B., & Stilwell, C. H.
2008An amicus for the defense: Relational reasoning magnifies the behavioral differences between humans and nonhumans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(3), 142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., & Povinelli, D, J.
2008Darwin’s mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(3), 109–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabakowska, E.
This volume. Diagrammatic iconicity and rendering time in a narrative text: Analogies and contrasts.
Tomasello, M.
2000First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 61–82.Google Scholar