Part of
Analogy and Contrast in Language: Perspectives from Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by Karolina Krawczak, Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk and Marcin Grygiel
[Human Cognitive Processing 73] 2022
► pp. 193244
Beneš, E.
1974Präpositionswertige Präpositionalfügungen. In U. Engel, & P. Grebe (Eds.), Sprachsystem und Sprachgebrauch: Festschrift für Hugo Moser zum 65. Geburtstag, Teil 1 (Sprache Der Gegenwart 33), vol. 1 (33–52). Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B.
1964Elaborated and restricted codes: Their social origins and some consequences. American Anthropologist, 66(6), 55–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B.
2016Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, G. E.
2010Construction morphology (Oxford Linguistics). Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2016Construction morphology. In A. Hippisley, & G. Stump (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology (424–448). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, S.
2004Are low-frequency complex prepositions grammaticalized? On the limits of corpus data – and the importance of intuition. In H. Lindquist, & C. Mair (Eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 13) (171–210). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Grammaticalization and English complex prepositions: A corpus-based study (Routledge Advances in Corpus Linguistics 7). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. D., & Pullum, G. K.
2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1987Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, D.
2001Genres, registers, text types, domains, and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning and Technology, 3, 37–72.Google Scholar
Lindstromberg, Seth
2010English prepositions explained. Rev. ed. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucy, J.
1996The scope of linguistic relativity: An analysis and review of empirical research. In J. Gumperz, & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (37–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., & Mulholland, J.
1964Complex prepositions and related sequences. English Studies, 45(1–6), 64–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Svartvik, J., & Leech, G. N.
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Seppänen, A., Bowen, R., & Trotta, J.
1994On the so-called complex prepositions. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 24, 3–29.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A.
2020Corpus linguistics. A guide to the methodology. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., Smirnova, E., & Hüning, M.
2020Complex adpositions in three West Germanic Languages: German, Dutch, and English. In B. Fagard, J. Pinto de Lima, D. Stosic, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Complex adpositions in European languages: A micro-typological approach to complex nominal relators (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 65) (65–138). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar