Cover not available
Part of
Analogy and Contrast in Language: Perspectives from Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by Karolina Krawczak, Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk and Marcin Grygiel
[Human Cognitive Processing 73] 2022
► pp. 371–404

Chapter 12
Moving reader or moving text?

Contrasts and analogies between metaphors of time and text organization in Finnish

| University of Turku
| University of Helsinki
This chapter is concerned with metaphors of text organization that are instantiated by metaphorical expressions pertaining to metatextual relations, i.e. relations between different parts of a text or between a text and its reader (e.g. as noted in the foregoing chapters). The purpose of the study is to examine metaphors of text organization denoted by Finnish front and back gram (adposition and adverb) constructions, and to compare the system of metaphors of text organization to the previously attested system for spatial metaphors of time. The study builds upon the system for metaphors of text organization presented by Huumo (2016), and expands on it by analyzing data extracted from online discussion messages posted at the Finnish social networking site Suomi24.
Keywords: adposition, adverb, back, front, metatext, space
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Spatial uses of Finnish front–back grams
  • 3.Metaphorical uses of the grams for time
  • 4.The data for the present study
  • 5.Finnish metaphors of text organization
    • 5.1Moving Reader
    • 5.2Moving Story
    • 5.3Reader-centered Moving Text
    • 5.4Moving Text Sequence
    • 5.5Moving ‘more to the fore’ and ‘more to the back’ in a text
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
  • Sources
  • Appendix
  • List of glossing abbreviations
Published online: 27 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.73.12huu
References (26)
References
Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., Bowdle, B., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C. 2001. Metaphor is like analogy. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (199–253). Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huumo, T. 2007. Force dynamics, fictive dynamicity and the Finnish verbs of ‘remaining’. Folia Linguistica, 41(1–2), 73–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Temporal frames of reference and the locative case marking of the Finnish adposition ete- ‘in front of / ahead’. Lingua, 164, 45–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. liikkuva lukija vai liikkuva teksti? Liikemetaforat tekstin ja lukijan suhdetta jäsentämässä. Folia Uralica Debreceniensia, 23, 85–111.Google Scholar
Hynönen, E. 2017. The essive in Finnish. In C. de Groot (Ed.), Uralic essive and the expression of impermanent state (29–56) [Typological Studies in Language 119]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itkonen, E. 1991. Two notions of universal grammar. The 1991 Yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland, 53–90.Google Scholar
2005. Analogy as structure and process: Approaches in linguistics, cognitive psychology, and philosophy of science [Human Cognitive Processing 14]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelloniemi, T. 2014. Perässä- ja jäljessä-grammien käyttö ja synonyymisyys. BA thesis. Turku: University of Turku, School of Languages and translation studies, Finnish and Finno-Ugric languages.Google Scholar
2018. Mitä muut edellä, sitä minä perässä, hieman jäljessä vain. Perässä- ja jäljessä-grammien merkitykset ja käyttö. MA thesis. Turku: University of Turku, School of Languages and translation studies, Finnish and Finno-Ugric languages.Google Scholar
Keresztes, K. 1964. Morphemic and semantic analysis of the word families: Finnish ETE- and Hungarian EL- ”fore-” [Indiana University Publications 41. Uralic and Altaic Series]. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 2013. Essentials of Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. 2003. Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, K. E. 2011a. Ego-perspective and field-based frames of reference: Temporal meanings of front in Japanese, Wolof, and Aymara. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 759–776. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b. Frames and the experiential basis of the Moving Time metaphor. Constructions and Frames, 3(1), 80–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014a. The spatial language of time: Metaphor, metonymy, and frames of reference [Human Cognitive Processing 42]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b. The Two-mover hypothesis and the significance of “direction of motion” in temporal metaphors. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 12(2), 375–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. Elaborating time in space: The structure and function of space-motion metaphors of time. Language & Cognition, 9(2), 191–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikanne, U. 2003. How Finnish postpositions see the axis System. In E. van der Zee, & J. Slack (Eds.), Representing direction in language and space (191–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suutari, T. 2006. Body-part names and grammaticalization. In M.-L. Helasvuo, & L. Campbell (Eds.), Grammar from the human perspective: Case, space and person in Finnish (101–128) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 277]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svorou, S. 1994. The grammar of space [Typological studies in language 25]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics: Volume 1. Concept structuring systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Teeri-Niknammoghadam, K. 2016. Se on tuomionpäivä edessä. Akseligrammien edellä ja edessä käyttö ja metaforisuus. MA thesis. Turku: University of Turku, School of Languages and translation studies, Finnish and Finno-Ugric languages.Google Scholar
2019. When important is ‘ahead’. The use of motion-implying front grams in spatial metaphors of importance in Finnish. Cognitive Semantics, 5(1), 92–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teeri-Niknammoghadam, K., Kelloniemi, T., & Huumo, T. 2020. Bussissa takana vai letkan perässä? Sijainnin ilmaiseminen liikkuvan kiintopisteen sisäpuolella. Virittäjä, 124(2), 161–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sources
Suomi24 = Aller Media Ltd. 2015. The Suomi 24 sentences corpus (2015H2) [text corpus]. Kielipankki. Available at: [URL]. (Accessed 1.2.2018.)