Part of
Time Representations in the Perspective of Human Creativity
Edited by Anna Piata, Adriana Gordejuela and Daniel Alcaraz Carrión
[Human Cognitive Processing 75] 2022
► pp. 233242
Cienki, A.
(2012) Usage events of spoken language and the symbolic units we (may) abstract from them. In J. Badio & K. Kosecki (Eds.), Cognitive processes in language (pp. 149–158). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2015a) The dynamic scope of relevant behaviors in talk: A perspective from cognitive linguistics. In Proceedings of the 2nd European and the 5th Nordic Symposium on Multimodal Communication. Available at: [URL]
(2015b) The notion of the dynamic scope of relevant behaviors in cognitive linguistic theory. In A. A. Kibrik & A. D. Koshelev (Eds.), Language and thought: Contemporary cognitive linguistics (pp. 560–573). Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture.Google Scholar
(2017a) Analysing metaphor in gesture: A set of metaphor identification guidelines for gesture (MIG-G). In E. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 131–147). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2017b) Ten lectures on spoken language and gesture from the perspective of cognitive linguistics: Issues of dynamicity and multimodality. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017c) Utterance Construction Grammar (UCxG) and the variable multimodality of constructions. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1), 20160048 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Insights for linguistics and gesture studies from film studies: A view from researching cinematic metaphor. In S. Greifenstein, D. Horst, T. Scherer, C. Schmitt, H. Kappelhoff & C. Müller (Eds.), Cinematic metaphor in perspective: Reflections on a transdisciplinary framework (pp. 53–68). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) A multimodal perspective on MCA: Cues of (possible) metacommunicative awareness. In C. Di Biase-Dyson & M. Egg (Eds.), Drawing attention to metaphor: Case studies across time periods, cultures and modalities (pp. 63–92). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H.
(1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending the and mind’s hidden complexities. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
(1985) Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6(2), 222–254.Google Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Kronrod, A., Elnatan, E., Shuval, N., & Zur, A.
(2004) Weapons of mass distraction: Optimal innovation and pleasure ratings. Metaphor & Symbol, 19(2), 115–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M.
(2014) Gestures and second language acquisition. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body–language–communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, vol. II (pp. 1868–1875). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.
(1988) A usage-based model. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 127–161). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, C.
(2008) What gestures reveal about the nature of metaphor. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 219–245). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, C., & Tag, S.
(2010) The dynamics of metaphor: Foregrounding and activating metaphoricity in conversational interaction. Cognitive Semiotics, 6, 85–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oakley, T.
(2009) From attention to meaning. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, C., & Zamm, A.
(2017) Interactions in ensemble music performance: Empirical and mathematical accounts. In M. Lessaffre, P.-J. Maes & M. Leman (Eds.), The Routledge companion on embodied music interaction (pp. 370–379). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reddy, M. J.
(1993) The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 164–201) (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P.
(1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shore, B.
(1996) Culture in mind: Cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.
(1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Turner, M.
(1996) The literary mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar