Abbott, B.
1992Definiteness, existentials, and the ‘list’ interpretation. In C. Barker, & D. Dowty (Eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory II (1–16). Columbus: Ohio State University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993A pragmatic account of the definiteness effect in existential sentences. Journal of Pragmatics 19(1), 39–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Achard, M.
1998Representation of Cognitive Structures: Syntax and semantics of French Sentential Complements. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beaver, D., Francez, I. & Levinson, D.
2006Bad subject. (Non-)canonicality and NP distribution in existentials. In E. Georgala, & J. Howell (Eds.), Proceedings of SALT 15 (19–43). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Benincà, P.
1988L’ordine degli elementi della frase. Costruzioni con ordinemarcato degli elementi. In L. Renzi (Ed.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione. Volume 1: La frase. I sintagmi nominale e preposizionale (129–194). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Bentley, D.
2004Definiteness effects: evidence from Sardinian. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102(1), 57–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Subject canonicality and definiteness effects in Romance there-entences. Language 89(4), 675–712. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bentley, D., Ciconte, F. M., & Cruschina, S.
2015Existentials and Locatives in Romance Dialects of Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bentley, D., & Cruschina, S.
2018The silent argument of broad focus: Typology and predictions. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1), 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berretta, M.
1995Come inseriamo elementi nuovi nel discorso /1. “C’è il gatto che ha fame”. Italiano e Oltre, 53, 79–105.Google Scholar
Berruto, G.
1986Un tratto sintattico dell’italiano parlato: Il c’è presentativo. In K. Lichem, E. Mara, & S. Knaller (Eds.), Parallela 2. Aspetti della sintassi dell’italiano contemporaneo (61–73). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D.
1981Roots of Language. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D.
1977Meaning and Form. New York: Longmans.Google Scholar
Burzio, L.
1986Italian Syntax. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlier, A.
2005« Ce sont des anglais »: un accord avec l’attribut? (Seconde partie). L’Information Grammaticale, 104, 4–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casalicchio, J.
2013The pseudo-relatives and other correspondent constructions in the Romance languages. In I. Windhaber, & P. Anreiter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Austrian Students’ Conference of Linguistics (64–84). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Clark, E.
1978Locationals. Existential, locative and possessive constructions. In: J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of Human Language (85–126). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Corr, A.
2016Wide-focus subject-verb inversion in Ibero-Romance: A locative account. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 1(11), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coy, C.
2016Existentials in relative clauses. A contrastive corpus study of Spanish haber and French y avoir. In C. De Benito Moreno, & A. S. O. De Toledo y Huerta (Eds.), En torno a haber: Construcciones, usos y variación desde el latín hasta la actualidad (191–207). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Creissels, D.
2019Inverse-locational predication in typological perspective. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 31(2), 37–106.Google Scholar
This volume. Existential predication and have-possessive constructions in the languages of the world. In Sarda, L. & Lena, L. Eds. Existential constructions across languages: Forms, meanings and functions 34 67 Amsterdam & Philadelphia John Benjamins
Cruschina, S.
2012Focus in Existential Sentences. In V. Bianchi, & C. Chesi (Eds.), Enjoy Linguistics! Papers offered to Luigi Rizzi on the occasion of his 60th birthday (77–107). Siena: CISCL Press.Google Scholar
2015Focus structure. In D. Bentley, F. M. Ciconte, & S. Cruschina (Eds.), Existentials and Locatives in Romance Dialects of Italy (43–98). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Setting the boundaries. Presentational ci-sentences in Italian. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 32, 53–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, K.
2014On specificational there-clefts. Leuven Working Papers in Linguistics, 1–34.Google Scholar
Davidse, K. & Kimps, D.
2016Specificational there-clefts: Functional structure and information structure. English Text Construction 9(1), 115–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, K. & Lahousse, K.
2014Specificational existential clefts in French and English. Round Table on Communicative Dynamism. Cardiff, UK: 4–5 September 2014.Google Scholar
De Cesare, A.-M.
2007Sul cosidetto ‘c’è presentativo’. Forme e funzioni. In A.-M. De Cesare, & D. Garassino 2016 (Eds.), Current Issues in Romance Non-Canonical Word Orders. Syntax – Information Structure – Discourse Organization. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
De Cesare, A.-M., Garassino, D., Agar Marco, R., Albom, A., & Cimmino, D.
2016 (Eds.), Sintassi marcata dell’italiano dell’uso medio in prospettiva contrastiva con il francese, lo spagnolo, il tedesco e l’inglese. Uno studio basato sulla scrittura dei quotidiani online. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, C., & Beyssade, C.
2004Définir les indéfinis. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Dufter, A.
2006Zwischen Kompositionalität und Konventionalisierung. Satzspaltung mit c’est im Französischen der Gegenwart. Romanistisches Jahrbuch, 57, 31–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008On explaining the rise of c’est-clefts in French. In U. Detges, & R. Waltereit (Eds.), The Paradox of Grammatical Change. Perspectives from Romance (31–56). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Clefting and discourse organization. Comparing Germanic and Romance. In A. Dufter, & D. Jacob (Eds.), Focus and Background in Romance Languages (83–121). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, N.
1997The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Francez, I.
2007Existential Propositions. PhD dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Giry-Schneider, J.
1988L’interprétation événementielle des phrases en il y a. Lingvisticæ Investigationes 12(1), 85–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hazout, I.
2004The syntax of existential constructions. Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 393–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B.
1997Possession: Cognitive Sources, Forces and Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, K.
1992Non-Verbal Predication: Theory, Typology, Diachrony. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huumo, T., & Helasvuo, M.-L.
2015On the subject of subject in Finnish. In M.-L. Helasvuo and T. Huumo (Eds.), Subjects in Constructions: Canonical and Non-Canonical Constructional Approaches to Language 16 (13–41). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. A.
1993Sardinian Syntax. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jullien, S.
2007Prosodic, syntactic and semantico-pragmatic parameters as clues for projection. The case of il y a. Nouveaux cahiers de linguistique française, 28, 279–297.Google Scholar
Karssenberg, L.
2016aFrench il y a clefts, existential sentences and the focus-marking hypothesis. Journal of French Language Studies 27(3), 405–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016bIl n’y a que Superman qui porte le slip par-dessus le pantalon. Les clivées en il n’y a que x qui. 5e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française 27 (1–14). Les Ulis: EDP Sciences.Google Scholar
Karssenberg, L., Marzo, S., Lahousse, K. & Guglielmo, D.
2017There’s more to Italian c’è clefts than expressing all-focus. Italian Journal of Linguistics 29(2), 57–86.Google Scholar
Karssenberg, L.
2018Non-prototypical Clefts in French: A Corpus Analysis of “il y a” Clefts. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karssenberg, L., & Lahousse, K.
2018On the different interpretations of sentence-initial ainsi ‘so’ and the competition between three types of verb–subject order. Folia Linguistica 52(1), 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, P.
2012Location, existence, and possession: A constructional-typological exploration. Linguistics, 50, 533–603. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
La Fauci, N., & Loporcaro, M.
1993Grammatical relations and syntactic levels in Bonorvese morphosyntax. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Syntactic Theory and the Dialects of Italy (155–203). Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Lahousse, K.
2006NP subject inversion in French. Two types, two configurations. Lingua 116(4), 424–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Implicit stage topics. A case study in French. Discours. Revue de linguistique, psycholinguistique et informatique, 1, 1–18.Google Scholar
2011Quand passent les cigognes: Le sujet nominal postverbal en français moderne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K.
1986Pragmatically motivated syntax. Presentational cleft constructions in spoken French. In A. M. Farley, P. T. Farley, & K.-E. McCullough (Eds.), 22nd Conference of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory (115–126). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1988Presentational cleft constructions in spoken French. In J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse (135–179). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics 39(3), 463–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Léard, J.-M.
1992Les gallicismes. Étude syntaxique et sémantique. Paris & Leuven: Duculot. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonetti, M.
2008Definiteness effects and the role of the coda in existential constructions. In H. H. Müller, & A. Klinge (Eds.), Essays on Nominal Determination: From Morphology to Discourse Management (131–162). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J.
1967A Note on possessive, existential and locative sentences. Foundations of Language 3(4), 390–396.Google Scholar
Marzo, S., & Crocco, C.
Meulleman, M.
2012Degrees of grammaticalization in three Romance languages: A comparative analysis of existential constructions. Folia Linguistica 46(2), 417–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milsark, G. L.
1977Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis, 3, 1–29.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. M.
1978Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 38 (178–189). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinto, M.
1997Licensing and Interpretation of Inverted Subjects in Italian. Utrecht: UiL OTS Dissertation series.
Pitavy, C.
2009 “Y a-t-il un chien qui aboie … dans les didascalies ?” Theatrical discourse and enunciation. Review of Interdisciplinary Centre for Studies of Contemporary Discursive Forms, 4, 123–146.Google Scholar
Rando, E., & Napoli, D. J.
1978Definites in there-sentences. Language 54(2), 300–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, M.
2006The EPP and Null Subjects in Romance. Newcastle: University of Newcastle dissertation.
2010‘Free’ inversion in Romance and the Null Subject Parameter. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in Minimalist Theory (231–262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2016Subjects, null subjects and expletives in Romance. In S. Fischer, & C. Gabriel (Eds.), Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance (329–362). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Tortora, C.
1997The Syntax and Semantics of the Weak Locatives. Newark, DE: University of Delaware dissertation.
2001Evidence for a null locative in Italian. In G. Cinque, & G. Salvi (Eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi (313–326). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2014A Comparative Grammar of Borgomanerese. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verwimp, L., & Lahousse, K.
2016Definite il y a-clefts in spoken French. Journal of French Language Studies 27(3), 263–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villalba, X.
2013Eventive existentials in Catalan and the topic-focus articulation. Italian Journal of Linguistics 25(1), 147–173.Google Scholar
Williams, E.
1984There-insertion. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 131–53.Google Scholar