Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 14:1/2 (1987) ► pp.7388
References (12)
References
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan. 1976. Saussure. Glasgow: Collins.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold. 1880. Einleitung in das Studium der indogermanischen Sprachen. Translated by E. Channing as Introduction to the Study of Language, 1882, repr. as a New Edition (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1974).Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. (ed.) 1970. A Leonard Bloomfield Anthology. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hoenigswald, Henry M. 1977. “Intentions, Assumptions, and Contradictions in Historical Linguistics”, in Roger W. Cole (ed.): Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, pp. 168–94. Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
1978. “Secondary Split, Typology, and Universals”, in Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Recent Developments in Historical Phonology, pp. 173–181. The Hague & New York: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell, and John Fought. 1981. American Structuralism. The Hague, Paris & New York: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lepschy, Giulio C. 1970. A Survey of Structural Linguistics. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1932. Review of Eduard Hermann, Lautgesetz und Analogie (Berlin: Weidmann, 1931). BSL 33:3.3 ff.Google Scholar
Teeter, Karl V. 1970. Review of Leonard Bloomfield, The Menomini Language. (New Haven & London: Yale Univ. Press, 1962). Lg 461.525–33.Google Scholar
For general orientation, see, of course:
Hall, Robert A., Jr. 1951/52. “American Linguistics, 1925–1950”. Archivum Linguisticum 31.101–123; 41.1–16.Google Scholar