Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 14:1/2 (1987) ► pp.7388
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan
1976Saussure. Glasgow: Collins.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold
1880Einleitung in das Studium der indogermanischen Sprachen. Translated by E. Channing as Introduction to the Study of Language 1882, repr. as a New Edition (Amsterdam: Benjamins 1974).Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
(ed.) 1970A Leonard Bloomfield Anthology. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hoenigswald, Henry M.
1977 “Intentions, Assumptions, and Contradictions in Historical Linguistics”, in Roger W. Cole (ed.): Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, pp. 168–94. Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
1978 “Secondary Split, Typology, and Universals”, in Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Recent Developments in Historical Phonology, pp. 173–181. The Hague & New York: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell, and John Fought
1981American Structuralism. The Hague, Paris & New York: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lepschy, Giulio C.
1970A Survey of Structural Linguistics. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
1932Review of Eduard Hermann, Lautgesetz und Analogie (Berlin: Weidmann 1931) BSL 33:3.3 ff.Google Scholar
Teeter, Karl V.
1970Review of Leonard Bloomfield, The Menomini Language. (New Haven & London: Yale Univ. Press 1962) Lg 461.525–33.Google Scholar
For general orientation, see, of course:
Hall, Robert A., Jr.
1951/52 “American Linguistics, 1925–1950”. Archivum Linguisticum 31.101–123; 41.1–16.Google Scholar