Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 17:1/2 (1990) ► pp.15–27

Dionysius thrax vs marcus varro

 | Lawrence University
This article critically assesses how Dionysius and Varro differ with respect to particular matters of linguistic theory and practice. It emphasizes the absence of declensions in Dionysius’ Téchnē (and in subsequent Greek grammar), his inability to distinguish between derivation and inflection, and the confusion – both conceptual and descriptive – in his account of conjugation, all of which are topics that Varro addresses elegantly and with linguistic sophistication. Dionysius therefore compares unfavorably with Varro in these respects, and the author concludes, suggestively, that Varro is responsible for transforming the Alexandrian word-class system of grammar into the word-and-paradigm system that is the Roman ars grammatica.
Published online: 1 January 1990
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.17.1-2.04tay
References (16)
References
Bekker, Immanuel. 1821. Anecdota Graeca. Vol.III1. Berlin: Reimer. (Repr., Graz: Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt, 1965.)Google Scholar
Cavazza, Franco. 1981. Studio su Varrone etimologo e grammatico: La lingua latina come modello di struttura linguistica. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Di Benedetto, Vincenzo. 1958–59. “Dionisio Trace e la techne a lui attribuita”. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Ser.II, 271.169–210 and 281.87–118.Google Scholar
. 1973. “La techne spuria”. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Ser.III, 31.797–814.Google Scholar
Funaioli, Hyginus, ed. 1907. Grammaticae Romanae Fragmenta. Leipzig: Teubner. (Repr., Stuttgart: Teubner, 1969.)Google Scholar
Hovdhaugen, Even. 1982. Foundations of Western Linguistics: From the beginning to the end of the first millennium A.D. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Kaster, Robert A. 1988. Guardians of Language: The grammarian and society in late antiquity. (= The Transformation of the Classical Heritage, 11.) Berkeley: Univ. of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keil, Heinrich, ed. 1874. Grammatici Latini. Vol.VI1. Leipzig: Teubner. (Repr., Hildesheim: Olms, 1961 and 1981.)Google Scholar
Kemp, J. Alan. 1987. “The Tekhnē Grammatikē of Dionysius Thrax: Translated into English”. The History of Linguistics in the Classical Period (= Taylor (1987b), 169–189. [=HL 131.343–363 (1986).] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kent, Roland Grubb. 1951. Varro: On the Latin Language. Vol.111. Rev. ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press; London: Heinemann. (Repr., 1958; first ed., 1938.)Google Scholar
Rawson, Elizabeth. 1985. Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Robins, Robert Henry. 1967, 1968. A Short History of Linguistics. London: Longmans; Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana Univ. Press. (2nd. ed., Longman, 1979.)Google Scholar
Taylor, Daniel J. 1974. Declinatio: A Study of the linguistic theory of Marcus Terentius Varro. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 2.) Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977. “Two Notes on Varro”. American Journal of Philology 981.130–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987a. “Rethinking the History of Language Science in Classical Antiquity”. The History of Linguistics in the Classical Period (= Taylor 1987b), 1–16 [= HL 131.175–190 (1986).]Google Scholar
, ed. 1987b. The History of Linguistics in the Classical Period. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 46.) [= HL13, nos.2/3. (1986) x + 175–468.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Taylor, Daniel J.
1993. Desperately seeking syntax: Rewriting the history of syntactic theory in Greece and Rome. Language & Communication 13:4 ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.