This paper outlines the history of dependency notions from Antiquity to the present century. Although the notion of syntactic dependency was unknown in Antiquity, the idea of semantic dependency was foreshadowed in early definitions of the minor parts of speech, i.e., parts of speech other than the noun and the verb. In part, this happened because logicians had originally posited only the two major parts of speech, and grammarians then formulated their definitions of the minor parts of speech in relation to those of the noun and the verb. The adverb, for instance, was defined as augmenting or diminishing the meaning of the verb. The first writer who used (if not coined) a special term to refer to the notion that some words specify or ‘determine’ the meanings of the subject noun and the verbal predicate was Boethius (ca. 500 A.D.), and in this way the notion of ‘determination’ was launched. As a result of the subsequent popularity of Boethius’s logical works, ‘determination’ was adopted and extensively utilized by Latin grammarians from the 12th century on. In the 13th century, it was complemented by the term ‘dependency’, which was the logical converse of ‘determination’. Grammarians claimed that a dependency relation exists between the members of all constructions. The vogue of ‘dependency’ declined even before the advent of Renaissance humanism, while ‘determination’ survived. In the early modern period, the terminological repertory expanded. Thus, in the 18th century, French grammarians coined the terms ‘modification’ (Buffier) and ‘complement’ (Du Marsais). The 20th century has been marked by a further increase of new terms. Inspired by Tesnière’s posthumous Elèments de syntaxe structurale (1959), some linguists have also proposed formalized dependency theories as alternatives to phrase-structure grammar.
1974 “The Tradition of Condillac: The problem of the origin of language in the eighteenth century and the debate in the Berlin Academy before Herder”. Studies in the History of Linguistics: Traditions and Paradigms ed. by Dell Hymes, 93–156. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.
Anonymous
1771Gramática de la lengua castellana, compuesta por la Real Academia Española. Madrid: D. Joachin de Ibarra. (Repr., ed. by Ramón Sarmiento, Madrid: Editora Nacional 1984.)
Arnauld, Antoine & Claude Lancelot
1660Grammaire générale et raisonnée. Paris: Pierre le Petit.
Arnauld, Antoine & Pierre Nicole
1965 [1662]La Logique, ou l’art de penser. Édition critique par Pierre Clair et François Girbal. Paris: Presses Univ. de France.
Baum, Richard
1976“Dependenzgrammatik”: Tesnières Modell der Sprachbeschreibung in wissenschaftlicher und kritischer Sicht. (= Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie, Beiheft 151.) Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933Language. New York: Holt & Co.
Buffier, Claude, S.J.
1709Grammaire françoise sur un plan nouveau pour en rendre les principes plus clairs et la pratique plus aisée. Paris: chez Nicolas le Clerc, Michel Brunet, Leconte et Montalant.
Chevalier, Jean-Claude
1968Histoire de la syntaxe: Naissance de la notion de complément dans la grammaire française (1530–1750). (= Publications romanes et françaises, 100.) Geneva: Droz.
Chomsky, Noam
1957Syntactic Structures (= Janua Linguarum, 4.) The Hague: Mouton.
Covington, Michael A.
1984Syntactic Theory in the High Middle Ages: Modistic Models of Sentence Structure. (= Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 39.) Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
De Rijk, L. M.
1972Logica modernorum: A Contribution to the history of early terminist logic. Assen: Van Gorcum.
Ebbesen, Sten
1982 “Ancient Scholastic Logic as the Source of Medieval Scholastic Logic”. The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy ed. by Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny & Jan Pinborg, 101–127. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Girard, Gabriel
1747Les Vrais principes de la langue françoise, ou La parole réduite en méthode, conformément aux lois de l’usage. Paris: Le Breton.
Harris, Zellig S.
1951Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Hertz, Martin
1859Prisciani grammatici Caesariensis Institutionum grammaticarum libri XVIII ex recensione Martini Hertzii, vol. II libros XIII-XVIII continens. (= Grammatici Latini ex recensione Henrici Keilii, 3.) Leipzig: Teubner. (Repr., Hildesheim: Olms 1961.)
Hjelmslev, Louis
1961Prologomena to a Theory of Language. Transl, by Francis J. Whitfield. 2nd ed. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.
Hockett, Charles
1958A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.
Holtz, Louis
1981Donat et la tradition de renseignement grammatical. Paris: CNRS.
Hudson, Richard
1984Word Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Humboldt, Wilhelm von
1836Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluß auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Druckerei der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Kretzmann, Norman
1967 “History of Semantics”. Encyclopedia of Philosophy ed. by Paul Edwards, vol.VII1, 358–406. New York: Macmillan.
Kretzmann, Norman
1968William of Sherwood’s Treatise on Syncategorematic Words. Translated with an Introduction and Notes by Norman Kretzmann. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
Kretzmann, Norman
1975 “Transformationalism and the Port-Royal Grammar”. Antoine Arnauld. & Claude Lancelot, General and Rational Grammar, ed. by Jacques Rieux and Bernard E. Rollin, 176–195. (= Janua Linguarum, Series Minor, 208.) The Hague: Mouton.
Kretzmann, Norman & Eleonore Stump
1988The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts. Vol.11: Logic and the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Lees, Robert B.
1960A Grammar of English Nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.
1768Oeuvres de Maupertuis. Vol.I1. Nouvelle édition corrigée et augmentée. Lyons: Jean-Marie Bruyset.
Meiser, Carl
1880Anicii Manlii Severini Boetii Commentarii in librum Aristoteles Peri hermeneias II1. Leipzig: Teubner.
Mel’čuk, Igor A.
1988Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
Migne, Jean-Paul
1891Patrologiae cursus completus, Series Latina. Vol.641. Paris: Garnier Frères.
Nida, Eugene A.
1966A Synopsis of English Syntax. (= Janua Linguarum, Series Practica, 19.) The Hague: Mouton.
Percival, W. Keith
1975 “The Grammatical Tradition and the Rise of the Vernaculars”. Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, vol.XIII1: Historiography of Linguistics, 231–275. The Hague: Mouton.
Percival, W. Keith
1976 “On the Historical Source of Immediate Constituent Analysis”. Notes from the Linguistic Underground ed. by James D. McCawley, 229–242. (= Syntax and Semantics, 7.) New York: Academic Press.
Robins, Robert H.
1966 “The Development of the Word Class System of the European Grammatical Tradition”, Foundations of Language 21.3–19. (Repr. in Robins 1970:185–203.)
Robins, Robert H.
1970Diversions of Bloomsbury: Selected writings on linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Rosier, Irène
1987 “La Syntaxe des Modistes: À propos d’un ouvrage récent”. Le Moyen âge 931.461–468.
Schoemann, Georg Friedrich
1862Die Lehre von den Redetheilen nach den Alten. Berlin: Wilhelm Hertz.
Swiggers, Pierre
1983 “Grammaire et théorie du langage chez Buffier”. Dix-huitième siècle 151.285–293.
Tesnière, Lucien
1959Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck. (2nd ed. 1966.)
Thurot, Charles
1869Extraits de divers manuscrits latins pour servir à l’histoire des doctrines grammaticales au moyen âge. Paris: Imprimerie impériale. (Repr., Frankfurt am Main: Minerva 1964.)
Wundt, Wilhelm
1880Logik: Eine Untersuchung der Principien der Erkenntniss und der methodenwissenschaftlichen Forschung. Vol.I1: Erkenntnisslehre. Stuttgart: F. Enke.
Wundt, Wilhelm
1900Völkerpsychologie: Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte. Vol.I1, Part 1: Die Sprache. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.
2006. Dependency Grammar. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 444 ff.
Wang, Yalan
2020. Quantitative Analysis of Dependency Structures. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
Zhang, Zhixiu
2015. Various Views of Dependency from the Perspective of Definitions. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 05:03 ► pp. 277 ff.
[no author supplied]
1993. References. In The Byzantine Grammarians, ► pp. 267 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.