Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 2:3 (1975) ► pp.353378
References
Amacker, René
1972 “Le choix des évidences et la formalisation”. Linguistica, semiologia, epistemologia éd. par Anna Ludovico et Ugo Vignuzzi, 1–12. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Apel, Karl Otto
1963Die Idee der Sprache in der Tradition des Humanismus von Dante bis Vico. (= Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 8.) Bonn: H. Bouvier.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua
1959 “Three Methodological Remarks on Fundamentals of Language [par Roman Jakobson et Morris Halle]”. Word 131.223–35. (Repr. dans Bar-Hillel 1970:317–28.)Google Scholar
1967 Compte rendu de The Structure of Language éd. par Jerrold J. Katz et Jerry A. Fodor (Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall 1964) Lg 431.526–50. (Repr. dans Bar-Hillel 1970:150–81.)Google Scholar
1969 Compte rendu de Lyons 1968 Semiotica 11.449–59. (Repr. dans Bar-Hillel 1970:364–74.)Google Scholar
1970Aspects of Language. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile
1964 “Lettres de F. de Saussure à A. Meillet”. CFS 211.89–130.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933Language. New York: H. Holt & Co.; Londres: Allen & Unwin 1935.Google Scholar
Burger, André
1961 “Significations et valeur de suffìxe verbal francais -e- CFS 181.5–15.Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, G. L.
1971Speculative Grammars of the Middle Ages. La Haye & Paris: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf
1958 “Beobachtungssprache und theoretische Sprache”. Dia-lectica 121.236–48.Google Scholar
1963 “Carl G. Hempel on Scientific Theories”. The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap éd. par Paul Arthur Schilpp, 958–66. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court; Londres: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1966Cartesian Linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York & Londres: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clair, Pierre, et François Girbal
éds. 1965Antoine Arnauld et Pierre Nicole: La Logique ou l’art de penser. Paris: Presses Univ. de France.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio
1952 “Sistema, norma y habla”. Revista de la Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias (Universidad de la Republica, Montevideo) 91. 113–77.Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio
1967 “Notizie biografìche e critiche su F. de Saussure”. Ferdinand de Saussure: Corso di linguistica generale éd. par T. De Mauro, 285–360. Bari: Laterzar (3e éd. 1970.)Google Scholar
De Rijk, Lambertus Marie
1967Logica modernorum. Vol. II1. 1–2. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Derwing, Bruce L.
1973Transformational Grammar as a Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Donzé, Roland
1967La Grammaire générale et raisonnée de Port-Royal. Berne: A. Francke. (2e éd. revue 1971.)Google Scholar
Engler, Rudolf
1959 “ CLG und SM: Eine kritische Ausgabe des ‘Cours de linguistique générale’”. Kratylos 41.119–32Google Scholar
1966 “Remarques sur Saussure, son système et sa terminologie”. CFS 221.35–40.Google Scholar
Formigari, Lia
1970Linguistica ed empirismo nel Seicento inglese. Bari: La-terza.Google Scholar
Frei, Henri
1968 “Syntaxe et méthode en linguistique synchronique”. Enzyklopàdie der geisteswissenschaftlichen Arbeitsmethoden, 4e livraison par Helmut Schnelle et al., 39–63. Munich & Vienne: R. Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio
1949 “Umanesimo e Rinascimento”. Questioni di storia della letteratura, 349–404. Milan: Marzorati.Google Scholar
Godel, Robert
1957Les sources manuscrites du Cours de linguistique générale de F. de Saussure. Genève: Droz; Paris: Minard.(2e tirage 1969.)Google Scholar
1966 “De la théorie du signe aux termes du système”. CFS 221.53–68.Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin
(1875–1949). 1926–56Mittelalterliches Geistesleben. 31 vols. Munich: M. Hueber.Google Scholar
Hall, Robert, A., Jr.
1936 “Linguistic Theory in Italian Renaissance”. Lg 131.96–107.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G.
1961La formazione dei concetti e delle teorie nelle scienze empiriche. Trad. ital. par Alberto Pasquinelli. Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
1968The State of the Art. La Haye: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K.
1973Ferdinand de Saussure: Origin and development of his linguistic theory in western studies of language. Braunschweig: F. Vieweg. (2e tirage 1974.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre
1966aEtudes galiléennes. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
1966bEtudes d’histoire de la pensée scientifique. Paris: Presses Univ. de France.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S.
1962The Structure of Scientifìc Revolutions. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. (2e éd. augmentée 1970.)Google Scholar
1972La rivoluzione copernicana. Turin: Einaudi. [Trad. ital. de The Copernican Revolution: Planetary astronomy in the development of western thought (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press 1957).]Google Scholar
Leont’ev, A. A.
éd. 1973Teoria dell’attività verbale. Bari: Laterza. [Trad. ital. de Teorija rečevoj dejateTnosti (Problemy psixolingvistiki) (Moscou: Izd. “Nauka” 1968).]Google Scholar
Lepschy, Giulio C.
1974 “Saussure e gli spiriti”. Studi saussuriani per Robert Godel éd. par René Amacker, Luis J. Prieto et Tullio De Mauro, 181–200. Bologne: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1968Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cam-bridge Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majerù, Alfonso
1972Terminologia logica della tarda Scolastica. Rome: Edi-zioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean
éd. 1967Logique et connaissance scientifìque. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan
1967Die Entwicklung der Sprachtheorie im Mittelalter. Münster: Aschendorff; Copenhague: Frost-Hansen.Google Scholar
Prieto, Luis J.
1964Principes de noologie. La Haye: Mouton.Google Scholar
Roos, Heinrich
1959 “Die Stellung der Grammatik im Lehrbetrieb des 13. Jahrhunderts”. Artes liberales: Von der antiken Bildung zur Wissenschaft des Mittelalters éd. par Josef Koch, 94–105. Leyde & Cologne: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Risso, Paolo
1968 “Linguisti d’oggi e fìlosofì del Seicento”. LeSt 31.1–20.Google Scholar
Rotta, Paolo
1909La filosofia del linguaggio nella Patristica e nella Scolastica. Turin: Bocca.Google Scholar
Sahlin, Gunvor
1928César Chesneau du Marsais et son rôle dans l’évolution de la grammaire générale. Paris: Presses Univ. de France.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1931Cours de linguistique générale. Ed. par Charles Bally et Albert Sechehaye, avec la collaboration de Albert Riedlinger. 3e éd. Paris: Payot. [Cité sous forme du sigle CLG.]Google Scholar
1967–68CLG. Edition critique par Rudolf Engler, Tome I1. Wiesbaden: O. Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Simone, Raffaele
1969 “Introduzione”. Grammatica e Logica di Port-Royal. Trad. et éd. par R. Simone, vii–1. Rome: Ubaldini.Google Scholar
1970 “Introduzione”. F. de Saussure: Introduzione al secondo corso di linguistica generale (1908–1909) éd. par Robert Godel, trad. ital. par R. Simone, 7–20. Rome: Ubaldini.Google Scholar
1971 “Comunicazione semiotica e comunicazione non-semiotica in Cordemoy”. La Cultura 91.376–91.Google Scholar
1972 “Sémiologie augustinienne”. Semiotica 61.1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinthal, Heymann
(1823–99). 1890Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft beiden Griechen und Römern, mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Logik. 2e éd. revue. Berlin: F. Dümmler. (Repr., Bonn: F. Dümmler 1961.)Google Scholar
Thurot, Charles
(1823–82). 1868Manuscrits et extraits de divers manuscrits pour servir à l’histoirg des doctrines grammaticales au moyen âge. Paris: Impr. impériale. (Repr., Francfort/M.: Minerva 1964.)Google Scholar
Waterman, John T.
1968Breve storia della linguistica. Florence: La Nuova Italia. [Trad. ital. de Perspectives in Linguistics (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press 1963).]Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 18 other publications

Andresen, Julie T.
1978. François Thurot and the First History of Grammar. Historiographia Linguistica 5:1-2  pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Bruche-Schulz, Gisela
2011. The “Geneva School”. Historiographia Linguistica 38:1-2  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Christmann, Hans Helmut
1982. Neuere Italienische Beiträge Zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft. Historiographia Linguistica 9:3  pp. 515 ff. DOI logo
Christmann, Hans Helmut
1987. Quelques remarques sur l’histoire de la linguistique. Historiographia Linguistica 14:3  pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Dini, Pietro U.
2005. Towards A Baltic Linguistics Historiography?. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 26:5  pp. 469 ff. DOI logo
Driel, Lodewijk van
1988. 19th-century linguistics. Historiographia Linguistica 15:1-2  pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Guitarte, Guillermo L.
1984. La Dimensión Imperial Del Español En La Obra De Aldrete. Historiographia Linguistica 11:1-2  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Hal, Toon Van
2019. Traditions, innovations, and connections in writing the history of linguistics. Historiographia Linguistica 46:3  pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Klifman, Harm
1988. Dutch language study and the trivium. Historiographia Linguistica 15:1-2  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Koerner, E.F. Konrad
2015. Linguistics, History of. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences,  pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Koerner, E.F.K.
1995. History of Linguistics: The Field. In Concise History of the Language Sciences,  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Koerner, E.F.K.
1995. Historiography of Linguistics. In Concise History of the Language Sciences,  pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Koerner, E.F.K.
2006. Historiography of Linguistics. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics,  pp. 332 ff. DOI logo
Mackert, Michael
1993. Interpretation, authorial intention, and representation: Reflections on the historiography of linguistics. Language Sciences 15:1  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Schultink, H.
1988. The historiography of Dutch linguistics a diachronic introduction. Historiographia Linguistica 15:1-2  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Swiggers, P.
1979. The linguistic conceptions of the encyclopédie. Lingua 49:2-3  pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Chapter 1. The historiography of linguistics past, present, future. In Last Papers in Linguistic Historiography [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 128],  pp. 4 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.