Cover not available
Review published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 23:1/2 (1996) ► pp.200–210
Book review

Grammatical Theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky. By P[eter] H[ugoe] Matthews

Reviewed by
| University of Washington
Published online: 1 January 1996
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.23.1-2.24new
References
Anderson, Stephen R.
1992 A-morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1976 Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933 Language. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957 Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1958 “Linguistics, Logic, Psychology, and Computers”. Computer Programming and Artificial Intelligence: An intensive course ed. by John W. Carr III1, 429–454. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Univ. of Michigan College of Engineering.Google Scholar
1959 Review of Verbal Behavior by B. F. Skinner (New York: Appleton 1957) Language 351.26–57.Google Scholar
1962 “Explanatory Models in Linguistics”. Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science ed. by Ernst Nagel, Patrick Suppes & Alfred Tarski, 528–550. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1975 “Introduction”. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, 1–53. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1980 Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle
1968 The Sound Pattern of English. New York & London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Harris, Randy A.
1993 The Linguistics Wars. Oxford & New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Huck, Geoffrey J. & John A. Goldsmith
1994 The Ideological Structure of Linguistic Theory: Agreement and dissent within the Chomsky an paradigm. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell & John Fought
1981 American Structuralism. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1971[1948], “Russian Conjugation”. Selected Writings by R. Jakobson, Vol.II1: Word and Language, 119–129. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1971[1949] “The Phonemic and Grammatical Aspects of Language in Their Interrelations”. Ibid., 103–114.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. & Thomas G. Bever
1976 “The Fall and Rise of Empiricism”. An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability ed. by Thomas G. Bever, Jerrold J. Katz & D. Terence Langendoen, 11–64. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Lees, Robert B.
1957 Review of Chomsky (1957). Language 331.375–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, P. H.
1974 Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
1979 Generative Grammar and Linguistic Competence. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
1981 Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O.
1980 “Gatekeepers and the ‘Chomskian Revolution’”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 161.73–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ronat, Mitsou
1972 “A propos du verbe ‘remind’ selon P. M. Postal, La sémantique générative: Une réminiscence du structuralisme?”. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica ed Applicata 11.233–267.Google Scholar
Trager, George L. & Henry Lee Smith
1951 An Outline of English Structure. Norman, Okla.: Battenburg Press.Google Scholar
Voegelin, C[harles] F. & F[lorence] M. Voegelin
1976 “Some Recent (and not so recent) Attempts to Interpret Semantics of Native Languages in North America”. American Indian Languages and American Linguistics ed. by Wallace L. Chafe, 75–98. Lisse, Holland: Peter de Ridder. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Stuurman, Frits, John Walmsley, Anneli Luhtala, Brigitte Nerlich, David D. Clarke, Robin D. Smith, Werner Hüllen, John Honey, L. F. van Driel, Werner Hüllen, M. G. Carter, Herman Bell, Werner Hüllen & Margaret J-M Sönmez
1997. Review. Henry Sweet Society for the History of Linguistic Ideas Bulletin 28:1 ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.