The article examines several issues raised in recent critiques of Ideology and Linguistic Theory (Huck & Goldsmith 1995) and finds no reason either to reject or to revise the original conclusion that Interpretivist arguments purporting to establish the superiority of Interpretive Semantics over Generative Semantics were weak and were justifiably dismissed by proponents of the latter. It also briefly discusses the particular use of the term ‘ideology’ and its application in an analysis of linguistic thought.
1986L’idéologie ou l’origine des idées reçues. Paris: Fayard.
Chomsky, Noam
1964Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, Noam
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam
1968 “The Formal Nature of Language”. Biological Foundations of Language by Eric Lenneberg, 397–442. New York: John Wiley.
Chomsky, Noam
1972a “Some Empirical Issues in the Theory of Transformational Grammar”. Goals of Linguistic Theory ed. by Stanley Peters, 63–130. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. (Repr. in Chomsky 1972b: 120–202. [Page references to the reprinted version].)
Chomsky, Noam
1972bStudies on Semantics in Generative Grammar. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, Noam
1975Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon.
Chomsky, Noam
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, Noam
1995The Minimaist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle
1968The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
De Mareken, Carl
1996The Unsupervised Acquisition of a Lexicon from Continuous Speech. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Emonds, Joseph
1969 “A Structure-Preserving Constraint on NP Movement Transformations”. Proceedings of the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 60–65. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Emonds, Joseph
1970Root and Structure Preserving Transforattions. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Emonds, Joseph
1976A Transformaional Approach to English Syntax. New York: Academic Press.
Fauconnier, Gilles
1985Mental Spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. (Repr., Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press 1994.)
Fogelman-Soulié, Françoise
1994Les théories de la complexité: Autour de l’ oeuvre de Henri Atlan Dir. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Freidin, Robert
1997Review of Huck & Goldsmith (1995). Anthropological Linguistics 391:494–501.
Gold, E. M.
1967 “Language Identification in the Limit”. Information and Control 101.447–474.
Goldsmith, John A.
1976Autosegmental Phonology. MIT dissertation.
Goldsmith, John A.
1989 “Autosegmental Licensing, Inalterability, and Harmonic Rule Application”. Papers from the 25th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 145–156. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Soceity.
Goldsmith, John A.
1990Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
ed.1993bThe Last Phonological Rule: Reflections on constraints and derivations. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Goldsmith, John A. & Geoffrey J. Huck
1991 “Distribution et médiation dans la théorie linguistique”. Communications 531.51–68.
Green, Georgia M.
1970 “How Abstract Is Surface Structure?”. Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 270–281. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Green, Georgia M.
1974[1971]Semantics and Syntactic Regularity. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.
Huck, Geoffrey J. & John A. Goldsmith
1994 “Gaps in the Paradigm”. Contemporary Linguistics 11.1–55.
Huck, Geoffrey J.. & John A. Goldsmith
1995Ideology and Linguistic Theory: Noam Chomsky and the Deep Structure Debates. London & New York: Routledge.
Hull, David L.
1988Science as a Process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Jackendoff, Ray
1983Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Jacobson, Pauline
1992 “Antecedent Contained Deletion in a Variable Free Semantics”. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory ed. by C. Barker & David Dowty. Columbus, Ohio: Dept. of Linguistics, Ohio State Univ..
Katz, Jerrold J.
1981Language and Other Abstract Objects. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield.
Kiparsky, Paul
1973 “Phonological Representations”. Three Dimensions of Linguistic Theory ed. by Osamu Fujimura, 1–136. Tokyo: TEC.
Kisseberth, Charles W.
1970a “On the Functional Unity of Phonological Rules”. Linguistic Inquiry 11:291–306.
Kisseberth, Charles W.
1970b “Vowel Elision in Tonkawa and Derivational Contraints”. Studies Presented to Robert B. Lees by his Students ed. by Jerrold M. Sadock & Anthony L. Vanek, 109–137. Champaign, 111.: Linguistic Research.
Klima, Edward
1964 “Negation in English”. The Structure of Language ed. by Jerry A. Fodor & Jerrold J. Katz, 246–323. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Lakoff, George
1970[1965]Irregularity in Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Lakoff, George
1971a “On Generative Semantics”. Semantics ed. by Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovits, 232–296. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Lakoff, George
1975b “Linguistics and Natural Logic”. Semantics of Natural Language ed. by Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman, vol.11, 545–565. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Lakoff, George & John Robert Ross
1976[1967] “Is Deep Structure Necessary?”. McCawley 1976a 159–164.
Lakoff, Robin
1968Abstract Syntax and Latin Complementation. Cambridge. Mass.: MIT Press.
Li, Ming & Paul Vitànyi
1993An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications. New York: Springer.
Lovins, Julie
1971 “Melodic Conspiracies in Lomongo Tonology”. Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 469–478. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
May, Robert
1985Logical Form: Its structure and derivation. (= Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, 12.) Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
McCawley, James D.
1968[1967] “The Role of Semantics in a Grammar”. Univer-sals in Linguistic Theory ed. by Emmon Bach & Robert Harms, 124–169. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. (Repr. in McCawley 1973:59–98 [page references to this version].)
McCawley, James D.
1971 “Interpretive Semantics Meets Frankenstein”. Foundations of Language 71.285–296. (Repr. in McCawley 1973:333–342 [page references to this version].)
McCawley, James D.
1973Grammar and Meaning: Papers on syntactic and semantic topics. Tokyo: Taishukan.
McCawley, James D.
1975 Review of Chomsky (1972b). Studies in English Linguistics 31.209311. (Reprinted in McCawley’sThirty Million Theories of Grammar, 10–127. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press 1982.)
McCawley, James D.
ed.1976aNotes from the Linguistic Underground. (= Syntax and Semantics, 7.) New York: Academic Press.
McCawley, James D.
1976b “Some Ideas not to Live by”. Die neueren Sprachen 751.151–165. (Reprinted in the author’s Adverbs, Vowels, and Other Objects of Wonder, 234–46. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press 1979.)
McCawley, James D.
1988The Syntactic Phenomena of English. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. (2nd rev. ed. 1998.)
McCawley, James D.
1998Review of Newmeyer (1995). Ms., Dept. of Linguistics, Univ. of Chicago.
Milsark, Gary
1972 “Re: Doubl-ing”. Linguistic Inquiry 31.542–549.
Montague, Richard
1973 “The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English”. Formal Philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague ed. by Richmond Thomason, 247–270. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
Morgan, Jerry
1973Presupposition and Semantic Representation: Prolegomena. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Chicago.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1980Linguistic Theory in America: The first quarter-century of transformaional generative grammar. New York: Academic Press. [Revised 2nd ed. published in 1986 without a subtitle.]
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1995Generative Linguistics: A historical perspective. London & New York: Routledge.
Niyogi, Partha & Robert C. Berwick
1996 “A Language Learning Model for Finite Parameter Spaces”. Cognition 611.161–193.
Oehrle, Richard T.
1976The Grammaical Status of the English Dative Alternation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Oehrle, Richard T.
1977Review of Green (1974). Language 531.198–208.
Perlmutter, David M.
1971 [1968]Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Postal, Paul
1972 “The Best Theory”. The Goals of Linguistic Theory ed. by Stanley Peters, 131–170. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky
Forthcoming. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar.
Rissanen, Jorma
1989Stochastic Complexity in Statistical Inquiry. Singapore & River Edge, N.J.: World Scientific.
Rissanen, Jorma & Eric Sven Ristad
1994 “Language Acquisition in the MDL Framework”. Language Computations ed. by E. S. Ristad, 127–166. Philadelphia: American Mathematical Society.
Roca, Iggy
ed.1997Derivations and Constraints in Phonology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ross, John Robert
1967Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. [Published in 1986 as Infinite Syntax!, Norwood: Ablex.]
Ross, John Robert
1972 “Doubl-ing”. Linguistic Inquiry 31.61–86.
Sadock, Jerrold
[c. 1972] Generative Semantics. Ms., Dept. of Linguistics, Univ. of Chicago.
Shannon, Claude & Warren Weaver
1949The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.
Singh, Raj
1987 “Well-Formedness Conditions and Phonological Theory”. Phonological Yearbook 1984, 273–286. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Sommerstein, Alan
1974 “On Phonotactically Motivated Rules”. Journal of Linguistics 101.71–94.
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Fortis, Jean-Michel
2011. La notion de grammaire usage-based chez Langacker. Emergence et développement. Travaux de linguistique n°62:1 ► pp. 35 ff.
Golumbia, David
2004. The interpretation of nonconfigurationality. Language & Communication 24:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Koerner, E.F.K.
2009. Koerner’s Korner. Historiographia Linguistica 36:2-3 ► pp. 481 ff.
Martin-Nielsen, Janet
2010. Redefining what matters: Syntactic explanation in American linguistics, 1955-1970. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 55:3 ► pp. 331 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.