Review article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 25:3 (1998) ► pp.373385
Ajdukiewicz, Kazimierz
1935 “Die syntaktische Konnexität”. Studia Philo-sophica 11.1–27.Google Scholar
Brame, Michael
1978Base Generated Syntax, Seattle: Noit Amrofer.Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi
1986Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1970 “Remarks on Nominalization”. Readings in English Transformational Grammar ed. by Roderick Jacobs & Peter S. Rosen-baum, 184–221. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn & Co.Google Scholar
1986Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Graffi, Giorgio
Forthcoming. History of Syntax in the 19th and 20th Centuries. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1966[1963] “Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements”. Universals of Language ed. by J. H. Greenberg, 2nd ed., 73–113. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S.
1970Papers in Structural and Transformational Linguistics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981Papers on Syntax. Ed. by Henry Hiz. Ibid. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K.
1993 “Zellig Sabbettai Harris: A comprehensive bibliography of his writings”. HL 201.509–520. (With a list of appraisals of Harris’ work, 520–522.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. & R. E. Asher
eds. 1995Concise History of the Language Sciences: From the Sumerians to the Cognitivists. Oxford & New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Linn, Andrew Robert
1996Review of Koerner & Asher (1995). HL 231.194200.Google Scholar
Plötz, Senta
ed. 1972Transformationelle Analyse: Die Transformations-theorie von Zellig Harris und ihre Entwicklung / Transformational Analysis. The Transformational Theory of Zellig Harris and its Development. Frankfurt a.M.: Athenaum.Google Scholar
Sgall, Petr
1964 “Zur Frage der Ebenen im Sprachsystem”. Travaux linguistiques de Prague 11.95–106.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
1986Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Togeby, Knud
1951Structure immanente de la langue française. Copenhague: Nordisk Sprog- og Kulturforlag.Google Scholar
Ward, Michael T.
1997Review of Koerner & Asher (1995). Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 331.271–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, Rulon S.
1947 “Immediate Constituents”. Language 231.81–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar