Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 29:3 (2002) ► pp.329–338

The asterisk from historical to descriptive and theoretical linguistics

An historical note

 | University of Verona
The use of the asterisk in descriptive and theoretical linguistics is attested well before the 1950s (contrary to what has been maintained by Householder in 1973). It is suggested that the meaning of the asterisk was extended from that of ‘unattested form’, which was standard in historical linguistics, to that of ‘unattested form’ in sense of ‘non-existent’; a further step was to assign to the asterisk the meaning of ‘impossible form’, hence also of ‘ungrammatical sentence’.
Published online: 2 May 2003
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.29.3.04gra
References (25)
References
Bach, Emmon. 1964. An Introduction to Transformational Grammars. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Bech, Gunnar. 1983 [1955–1957]. Studien über das deutsche Verbum infinitum. 21., unveränderte Auflage mit einem Vorwort von Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale [I1]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
. 1974. Problèmes de linguistique générale, II1. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1968. Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
. 1970. “Remarks on Nominalization”. Readings in English Transformational Grammar ed. by Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum, 184–221. Boston: Ginn.Google Scholar
Daneš, František. 1964. “A Three-Level Approach to Syntax”. Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1 (L’École de Prague d’aujourd’hui), 225–240. Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio. 1958. “Storia e analisi semantica di ‘classe’”. Rassegna di Filosofia 81.309–351.Google Scholar
Ernout, Alfred & Antoine Meillet. 1932. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1963. “The Position of Embedding Transformations in a Grammar”. Word 191.208–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frei, Henri. 1929. La grammaire des fautes. Paris & Genève: Geuthner. (Repr., Genève: Slatkine, 1971.)Google Scholar
Hatcher, Anna G. 1944. “Je le vois sourire, Je le vois qui sourit, Je le vois souriant”. Modern Language Quarterly 51.275–301, 387–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1956. “Syntax and the Sentence”. Word 121.234–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Householder, Fred W. 1973. “On Arguments from Asterisks”. Foundations of Language 101.365–376.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. & Paul M. Postal. 1964. An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. Konrad. 1977. “Sulla origine e la storia dell’asterisco nella linguistica storica. Un cenno storiografico”. Problemi della ricostruzione in linguistica ed. by Raffaele Simone & Ugo Vignuzzi, 253–258. Roma: Bulzoni. (Repr., with a “Postscript 1988”, in Koerner, Practicing Linguistic Historiography, 179–184. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1989.)Google Scholar
Lees, Robert B. 1966 [1 1960]. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. 4th printing. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1963. “Analysis of the ‘Cleft Sentence’ in English”. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 161.371–388.Google Scholar
Migliorini, Bruno. 1941. Saggi sulla lingua del Novecento. Firenze: Sansoni.Google Scholar
Roberts, Paul. 1964. English Syntax. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
Sgroi, Salvatore Claudio. 1997. “L’asterisco nella linguistica italiana, francese e spagnola”. Italica et Romanica: Festschrift für Max Pfister ed. by Günter Holtus, Johannes Kramer & Wolfgang Schweickard, vol. III1, 441–447. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien. 1959. Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: C. Klincksieck. (2nd ed., 1966.)Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Abrusán, Márta
2019. Semantic Anomaly, Pragmatic Infelicity, and Ungrammaticality. Annual Review of Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 329 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.