Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 3:3 (1976) ► pp.275–291

The Semantic Theory of James Harris

A Study of Hermes (1751)

 | University of Santa Clara
Although the semantic theory proposed by Harris in Hermes (1751) was not well received in 18th-century England and has been generally neglected by scholars ever since, it is certainly deserving of our attention because it is a perceptive analysis of the logico-semantic structure of language. In the tradition of philosophical or universal grammar, Harris argued that the subject matter of the linguist should be the conceptual level or the deep structure of language rather than the utterance or the surface structure. Therefore, Harris reasoned that an adequate explanation of meaning required a description of the relationship of language and thought. Furthermore, since he recognized that the study of language was necessary for the advancement of learning, which he considered to be the essence of science, he regarded the limits of 18th-century science too narrow in that they excluded semantics. Harris’ theory advanced that an analysis of the sentence, the basis of the synthesis of the mind and language, was crucial to a semantic theory. Since the number of utterances is infinite, Harris attempted to discover a finite and universal set of psychological principles which he believed generated sentences. Although he concluded that a notion of general and particular ideas would ultimately explain verbal communication, he hoped that identifying the source of these ideas would be the work of future scholars.
Published online: 1 January 1976
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.3.3.02sub
References (47)
References
Aarsleff, Hans. 1967. The Study of Language in England 1780–1860. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Asbach-Schnitker, Brigitte. 1973. A Linguistic Commentary on John Fearn’s “Anti-Tooke” (1824/27). Tübingen: M. Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bach, Emmon. 1965. “Structural Linguistics and the Philosophy of Science”. Diogenes 511.111–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baugh, Albert C. 1957. History of the English Language. 2nd. ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Morton W., and Leonard Newmork. 1963. A Linguistic Introduction to the History of English. New York: A. A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Bohnert, Herbert G. 1974. “The Logico-Linguistic Mind-Brain Problem and a Proposed Step towards its Solution”. Philosophy of Science 411.1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boswell, James. (1740–95.) 1791. Life of Samuel Johnson, LL.D. London: Baldwin. (2nd. ed. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1957.)Google Scholar
Brekle, Herbert E. 1976. “An Early Plea for a Relation Treatment of Verbs and Prepositions: John Fearn’s Anti-Tooke (1824–27)”. History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics ed. by Herman Parret, 503–17. Berlin & New York: W. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, G. L. 1974. “Toward a History of Linguistics in the Middle Ages, 1100–1450”. Hymes 1974.77–92.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Topics in the Theory of Generative Grammar. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Dalgarno, George (c. 1626–87) 1661. Ars signorum, vulgo character universalis. London: J. Hayes. (Repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1969.)Google Scholar
DeMott, Benjamin. 1957. “Science versus Mnemonics: Notes on John Ray and on John Wilkins’ Essay towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Grammar ”. Isis 481.3–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1958. “The Sources and Development of John Wilkins’ Philosophical Language”. JEGP 521.1–13.Google Scholar
Derwing, Bruce. 1973. Transformational Grammar as a Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Fearn, John (1768–1837). 1824–1827. Anti-Tooke; or an Analysis of the Principles and Structures of Language exemplified in the English Tongue. 21 vols. London. (Facs.-ed., Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1972.)Google Scholar
Funke, Otto. 1959. “On the Sources of John Wilkins’ ‘Philosophical Language’ (1668)”. ES 401.208–14.Google Scholar
Harris, James (1709–80). 1751. Hermes: or, a Philosophical Inquiry concerning Language and Universal Grammar. London: J. Nourse and P. Vaillant. (Repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1968.)Google Scholar
Home Tooke, John (1736–1812). 1798–1805. or, The diversions of Purley. 21 vols. London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell, ed. 1974. Studies in the History of Linguistics: Traditions and Paradigms. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Richard F. 1930. “Science and English Prose Style in the Third Quarter of the Seventeenth Century”. PMLA 451.917–1009. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1932. “Science and Language in England of the Mid-Seventeenth Century”. JEGP 311.315–31.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. 1972. Semantic Theory. New York & London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. 1972. “Towards a Historiography of Linguistics: 19th and 20th Century Paradigms”. AnL 141.255–80.Google Scholar
1974. “Editorial: Purpose and Scope of Historiographia Linguistica ”. HL 11.1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd. ed. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffry. 1974. Semantics. Middlesex, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
Leonard, Sterling A(ndrus 1888–1931). 1929. The Doctrine of Correctness in English Usage, 1700–1800. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Lowth, Robert (1710–87). 1762. A Short Introduction to English Grammar. London: A. Miller & R. & J. Dodsby. (Repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1967.)Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1970. “Where Do Noun Phrases Come From?”. Readings in Transformational Grammar ed. by Roderick A. Jacobs and Peter S. Rosenbaum, 166–83. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn & Co.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara Hall. 1971. “On the Requirement that Transformations Preserve Meaning”. Studies in Linguistic Semantics ed. by Charles L. Fillmore and D. Terence Langendoen, 1–21. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Peters, Robert A. 1968. A Linguistic History of English. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
Purver, Margery. 1967. Royal Society: Concept and Creation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pyles, Thomas. 1971. The Origin and Development of the English Language. 2nd. rev. ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Robins, R(obert) H(enry). 1974. “Theory-Orientation versus Data-Orientation: A recurrent theme in linguistics”. HL 1:1.11–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salmon, Vivian. 1974. “John Wilkins’ Essay (1668): Critics and continuais”. HL 1:2.147–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1975. Review of Asbach-Schnitker 1973. Anglia 93: 4.443–46.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara. 1969. John Wilkins 1614–1672. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, Danny D., and Leon A. Jakobovits, eds. 1971. Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Stimson, Dorothy. 1931. “Dr. Wilkins and the Royal Society”. The Journal of Modern History 31.539–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stankiewicz, Edward. 1974. “The Dityramb to the Verb in Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Linguistics”. In Hymes 1974.157–90.Google Scholar
Subbiondo, Joseph L. 1975. “William Ward and the ‘Doctrine of Correctness’”. JEL 91.36–46.Google Scholar
Sugg, Redding S. 1964. “The Mood of Eighteenth-Century English Grammar”. PhQ 431.239–52.Google Scholar
Wald, Lucia. 1974. “Filozofia limbajului în opera lui James Harris”. Probleme de lingvistica generala 61.7–15. (E. summ., p. 16.)Google Scholar
Wallis, John (1616–1703). 1653. Grammatica lingua Anglicanae. Oxford: L. Lichfield. (Repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1969.)Google Scholar
Ward, William (fl. 1765–85). 1765. An Essay on Grammar. London: Hors-field. (Repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1967.)Google Scholar
Wilkins, John (1614–72) 1668. An Essay Towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language. London: Gellibrand & Martin. (Repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1968.)Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Subbiondo, J.L.
2006. Harris, James (1709–1780). In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Bergheaud, Patrice
1979. De James Harris à John Horne Tooke. Historiographia Linguistica 6:1 ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Subbiondo, Joseph L.
1978. William holder's ‘elements of speech (1669)’. Lingua 46:2-3 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Subbiondo, Joseph L.
2022. ‘A philosopher’s grammar’: Henry Sweet’s ‘general’, ‘universal’, and ‘philosophical grammar’. Language & History 65:1 ► pp. 24 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.