Joseph Priestley’s (1733–1804) Rudiments of English Grammar (1761, second revised edition 1768) has often been interpreted as demonstrating that, unlike most 18th-century grammarians, Priestley took a descriptive approach towards the study of language. This article argues that such a characterisation both of Priestley’s work and that of his contemporaries is misleading. The article offers a reappraisal of Priestley’s Grammar, demonstrating that the idea of linguistic perfectibility is central to his linguistic ideas, but that it has often been overlooked by modern commentators. The two editions of Priestley’s Grammar are assessed, and it is argued that the substantial alterations that he makes for the second edition reveal a grammarian struggling to bring order to the study of the English language.
1981Language Change: Progress or decay? London: Fontana.
Anon
1797 “Review of William Godwin, The Enquirer”. Monthly Review, New Series 231.291–301.
Azad, Yusef
1989The Government of Tongues: Common usage and the ‘prescriptive’ tradition 1650–1800. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford.
Barrell, John
1983English Literature in History 1780–1830: An equal, wide survey. London: Hutchison.
Baugh, Albert C[roll] & Thomas Cable
1993 [3
1978] A History of the English Language. 4th rev. ed. London: Routledge.
Beal, Joan C.
1999English Pronunciation in the Eighteenth Century: Thomas Spence’s ‘Grand Repository of the English Language (1775). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Beal, Joan C.
2004English in Modern Times. London: Edward Arnold.
Bevilacqua, Vincent M. & Richard Murphy
eds.1965 “Introduction”. A Course of Lectures on Oratory and Criticism by Joseph Priestley. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Cameron, Deborah
1995Verbal Hygiene. London & New York: Routledge.
Crowley, Tony
2003Standard English and the Politics of Language. 2nd ed. revised. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. [1st ed. published under the title The Politics of Discourse, London: Macmillan 1989.]
Elledge, Scott
1967 “The Naked Science of Language”. Studies in Criticism and Aesthetics 1660–1800: Essays in honor of Samuel Holt Monk ed. by Howard Anderson & John S. Shea, 266–295. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Fenn, Ellenor
[1798?] The Mother’s Grammar. London: John Marshall.
Finegan, Edward
1998 “Chapter 6: English Grammar and Usage”. Cambridge History of the English Language, volume IV1: 1776–1997 ed by Suzanne Romaine, 536–588. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Godwin, William
1793An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice. 21 vols. London: G.G.J. & J. Robinson.
Godwin, William
1797 “Of English Style”. The Enquirer: Reflections on education, manners and literature by William Godwin, 368–488. London: G.G.J. & J. Robinson.
Harris, Roy
1993 “Introduction”. Reprint of Course of Lectures on the Theory of Language and Universal Grammar by Joseph Priestley, v–xi. London: Routledge / Thoemmes Press.
Hoecker, James J.
1987Joseph Priestley and the Idea of Progress. New York: Garland.
Leonard, Sterling Andrus
1962 [1929]The Doctrine of Correctness in English Usage 1700–1800. New York: Russell & Russell.
Locke, Don
1980A Fantasy of Reason: The life and thought of William Godwin. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
McIntosh, Carey
1998The Evolution of English Prose, 1700–1800: Style, politeness, and print culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Michael, Ian
1970English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mitchell, Linda C.
2001Grammar Wars: Language as cultural battlefield in 17th and 18th century England. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Mugglestone, Lynda
2003 [1995]‘Talking Proper’: The rise of accent as social symbol. 2nd rev. ed. Oxford: Clarendon.
Percy, Carol
1994 “Paradigms for Their Sex? Women’s grammars in late eighteenth-century England”. Histoire Épistémologie Histoire 16:2.121–141.
Priestley, Joseph
1761Rudiments of English Grammar; Adapted to the Use of Schools. with Observations on Style. London: R. Griffiths.
Priestley, Joseph
1762A Course of Lectures on the Theory of Language and Universal Grammar. Warrington: W. Eyres. (Facs.-reprint, London: Routledge / Thoemmes Press 1993.)
Priestley, Joseph
1768The Rudiments of English Grammar, Adapted to the Use of Schools; with Notes and Observations for the use of those who have made some Proficiency in the Language. 2nd edition revised. London: T. Becket, P. A. de Hondt & J. Johnson.
Priestley, Joseph
1772A Course of Lectures on Oratory and Criticism. London: J. Johnson. (Facs.-reprint, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press 1965.)
Rodriguez-Gil, Maria
2002Teaching English Grammar in the Eighteenth Century: Ann Fisher. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Las Palmas, Tenerife.
Romaine, Suzanne
1998 “Introduction”. Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. IV1: 1776–1997 ed. by Suzanne Romaine, 3–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1974 [1916]Course in General Linguistics. Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye in collaboration with Albert Riedlinger. Translated by Wade Baskin. London: Fontana.
Schofield, Robert E.
1997The Enlightenment of Joseph Priestley: A study of his life and work from 1733 to 1773. College Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Smith, Olivia
1986The Politics of Language 1791–1819. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon. [1st ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press 1984.]
Sugg, Redding S. Jr.
1964 “The Mood of Eighteenth-Century English Grammar”. Philological Quarterly 43:2.239–252.
Swift, Jonathan
1712A Proposal for Correcting, Improving, and Ascertaining the English Tongue in a Letter to the Most Honourable Robert Earl of Oxford and Mortimer, Lord High Treasurer of Great Britain. London: Benj. Tooke. (Facs.-reprint, Menston, Yorks.: Scolar Press 1969.)
Taylor, Talbot J.
1990 “Which Is to Be Master? The institutionalization of authority in the science of language”. Ideologies of Language ed. by John E. Joseph & Talbot J. Taylor, 9–26. London & New York: Routledge.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid
1996 “Lindley Murray and the Concept of Plagiarism”. Two Hundred Years of Lindley Murray ed. by Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, 81–96. Münster: Nodus.
Wales, Katie
1996 “With Apologies to Lindley Murray: The narrative method of the ‘Eumaeus’ episode in Ulysses”. Two Hundred Years of Lindley Murray ed. by Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, 207–216. Münster: Nodus.
Williams, Gwyn A.
1989Artisans and Sans-Culottes: Popular movements in France and Britain during the French Revolution. 2nd rev. ed. London: Libris. [1st ed., London: Arnold 1968.]
Cited by
Cited by 8 other publications
Wendy Ayres-Bennett & John Bellamy
2021. The Cambridge Handbook of Language Standardization,
McLelland, Nicola
2021. Grammars, Dictionaries and Other Metalinguistic Texts in the Context of Language Standardization. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Standardization, ► pp. 263 ff.
Oaks, Dallin D.
2021. Linguistic encounters in real world prescriptivism: Acknowledging its place and role. Lingua 264 ► pp. 103159 ff.
Percy, Carol
2012. Attitudes, prescriptivism, and standardization. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ► pp. 446 ff.
2022. Methodological approaches to the study of codification, prescription, and prescriptivism. Studia Neophilologica 94:3 ► pp. 334 ff.
Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen & Willem B. Hollmann
2019. Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax,
Yáñez‐Bouza, Nuria & María E. Rodríguez‐Gil
2013. The ECEG database. Transactions of the Philological Society 111:2 ► pp. 143 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.