Review published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 35:3 (2008) ► pp.425431
References (22)
References
Adams, J. N. 2003. “Romanitas’ and the Latin Language”. Classical Quarterly 531.184–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allen, W. S. 1981. “The Greek Contribution to the History of Phonetics”. Towards a History of Phonetics ed. by R. E. Asher & Eugénie J. A. Henderson, 115–122. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Belardi, Walter. 1985. Filosofia, grammatica e retorica nel pensiero antico. Rome: Edizione dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Belcher, Ken. 2005. “Theocritus’ Ancient Commentators”. Antike Fachtexte / Ancient Technical Texts ed. by Thorsten Fögen, 191–206. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, Thomas. 1988. Epiploke: Rhythmical continuity and poetic structure in Greek lyric. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dickey, Eleanor. 1996. Greek Forms of Address from Herodotus to Lucian. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. Latin Forms of Address from Plautus to Apuleius. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edzard, Lutz & Adolf Köhnken. 2006. “A New Look at the Greek, Syriac, and Arabic Versions of Aristotle’s Poetics ”. Grammar as a Window onto Arabic Humanism: A collection of articles in honour of Michael G. Carter ed. by Lutz Edzard & Janet Watson, 222–264. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Frede, Michael. 1994. “The Stoic Notion of a Lekton ”. Language ed. by Stephen Everson, 109–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hilgard, Alfred, Richard Schneider & Gustav Uhlig, eds. 1867–1910. Grammatici Graeci. 41 vols. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Hyman, Malcolm D. 2003. “One Word Solecisms and the Limits of Syntax”. Syntax in Antiquity ed. by Pierre Swiggers & Alfons Wouters, 179–192. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Krebernik, Manfred. 2007. “Zur Entwicklung des Sprachbewusstseins im Alten Orient”. Das geistige Erfassen der Welt im Alten Orient: Beiträge zu Sprache, Religion, Kultur und Gesellschafted. by Claus Wilcke, 39–61. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1971. Preliminaries to Linguistic Phonetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lallot, Jean. 2003. “À propos des syncatégorèmes : Consignification et signification adjacente dans la tradition logico-grammaticale grecque”. Histoire Épistémologie Langage 251.9–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nauck, August. 1867. Lexicon Vindobonense. St. Petersburg: Eggers.Google Scholar
Palumbo Stracca, Bruna M. 1979. La teoria antica degli asinarteti. Rome: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, Rudolf. 1968. History of Classical Scholarship: From the beginnings to the end of the Hellenistic age. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Signes-Codoñer, Juan. 2005. “The Definitions of the Greek Middle Voice between Apollonius Dyscolus and Constantinus Lascaris”. Historiographia Linguistica 321.1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Daniel J. 1987. “Rethinking the History of Language Science in Classical Antiquity”. The History of Linguistics in the Classical Period ed. by Daniel J. Taylor (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 46), 1–16. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veldhuis, Niek. 1997. Elementary Education at Nippur: The lists of trees and wooden objects. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar
Versteegh, Cornelis H. M. 1987. “Latinitas, Hellenismos, ‘Arabiyya”. Taylor, ed. 1987.251–274.Google Scholar
Vickers, Michael. 1997. Pericles on Stage: Political comedy in Aristophanes’ early plays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar