Cover not available
Review published In:
Quot homines tot artes: New Studies in Missionary Linguistics
Edited by Otto Zwartjes and E.F.K. Koerner †
[Historiographia Linguistica 36:2/3] 2009
► pp. 452–457
Book review

Aux origines d’une science allemande de la culture: Linguistique et psychologie des peuples chez Heymann Steinthal. By Céline Trautmann-Waller

Reviewed by
 | University of North Alabama
Published online: 2 December 2009
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.36.2.19chr
References (21)
References
Aarsleff, Hans, Louis G. Kelly & Hans-Josef Niederehe, eds. 1987. Papers in the History of Linguistics. (= Studies in the History of Linguistics, 38.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bréal, Michel. 1897. Essai de Sémantique. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Bumann, Waltraud. 1965. Die Sprachtheorie Heymann Steinthals dargestellt im Zusammenhang mit seiner Theorie der Geisteswissenschaft. Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain.Google Scholar
Christy, Craig. 1983. Uniformitarianism in Linguistics. (= Studies in the History of Linguistics, 31.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1985. “Humboldt’s ‘Inner Language Form’ and Steinthal’s Theory of Signification”. Deely, ed. 1985.251–259.Google Scholar
. 1987. “Steinthal and the Development of Linguistic Science: The Convergence of Psychology and Linguistics”. Aarsleff et al., eds. 1987.491–499. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. “From Articulation to Comprehension: Steinthal and the dynamics of linguistic intangibles”. Wiedebach & Winkelmann, eds. 2002.3–16.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Steinthal and the Limits of Etymology: The special case of Chinese”. Kibbee, ed. 2007.252–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deely, John, ed. 1985. Semiotics 1984. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Jerold A. 1999. “Steinthal and the History of Chinese Linguistics”. Leopold, ed. 1999b.381–413.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1836. Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluß auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Ferdinand Dümmler. (Facs. reprint, Bonn: Ferdinand Dümmler, 1968.)Google Scholar
Kibbee, Douglas, ed. 2007. History of Linguistics 2005. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 112.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leopold, Joan, 1999a. The Prix Volney: Its history and significance for the development of linguistic research. (= The Prix Volney Essay Series, 1a.) Dordrecht–Boston–London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
, ed. 1999b. The Prix Volney: Contributions to comparative Indo-European, African and Chinese linguistics. Max Müller and Steinthal. (= The Prix Volney Essay Series, 3.) Dordrecht–Boston–London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte. 1990. Change in Language: Whitney, Bréal and Wegener. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ringmacher, Manfred. 1996. Organismus der Sprachidee: H. Steinthals Weg von Humboldt zu Humboldt. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Sprachwissenschaft, Philologie und Völkerpsychologie: Die Grenzen ihrer Verträglichkeit bei H. Steinthal”. Wiedebach & Winkelmann, eds. 2002.64–88.Google Scholar
Steinthal, Heymann. 1854. “Zur vergleichenden Erforschung der chinesischen Sprache”. First published in Leopold, ed. 1999b.414–498.Google Scholar
Treitschke, Heinrich von. 1879. “Unsere Aussichten [Our Perspectives]”. Preuβische Jahrbücher 441.559–576.Google Scholar
Wiedebach, Hartwig & Annette Winkelmann, eds. 2002. Chajim H. Steinthal: Sprachwissenschaftler und Philosoph im 19. Jahrhundert. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wundt, Wilhelm. 1900–1920. Völkerpsychologie: Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte. 101 vols. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar