Review published In:
Robert Lowth (1710-1787): The making of his grammar and its influence
Guest-edited by Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade
[Historiographia Linguistica 39:1] 2012
► pp. 129133
References (6)
References
Koerner, E. F. K[onrad]. 1987. “On the Problem of ‘Influence’ in Linguistic Historiography”. Papers in the History of Linguistics: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS III), Princeton, 19–23 August 1984 ed. by Hans Aarsleff, Louis G. Kelly & Hans-Josef Niederehe, 13–28. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins (Repr. in Practicing Linguistic Historiography by Koerner, 31–46. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1989.)Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. 1993. “The Problem of Metalanguage in Linguistic Historiography”. Studies in Language 17:1.111–134.Google Scholar
van der Loon, Piet. 1966. “The Manila Incunabula and Early Hokkien Studies (Part I)”. Asia Major 121.1–43.Google Scholar
. 1967. “The Manila Incunabula and Early Hokkien Studies (Part II)”. Asia Major 131.95–186.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1985. Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2004. New Dialect Formation: The inevitability of colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar