Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 42:1 (2015) ► pp.119137
References
Bolinger, Dwight L[eMerton]
1947aReview of Pike (1945). Studies in Linguistics 51.69–78.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L.
1947bReview of Pike (1945). American Speech 221.134–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1949 “Intonation and Analysis”. Word 51.248–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1951 “Intonation: Levels versus configurations”. Word 71.199–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1958 “A Theory of Pitch Accent in English”. Word 141.109–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ed. 1972Intonation. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Crystal, David
1969Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeCamp, David
1968 “The Current Discrepancy between Theoretical and Applied Linguistics”. TESOL Quarterly 21.3–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz
1980 “On Stress-Timing in English Phonology”. Lingua 511.187–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gleason, Henry A[llan]
1955An Introduction to Descriptive Linguistics. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston. (2nd ed. 1961.)Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F[rancis]
1958A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huck, Geoffrey J. & John A. Goldsmith
1995Ideology and Linguistic Theory: Noam Chomsky and the deep structure debates. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Insler, Stanley
2008 “Obituary of Rulon Wells”. The Linguist List 1 July 2008 [URL]. Accessed 24 Nov. 2014.
Kingdon, Roger
1958The Groundwork of English Intonation. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert
1983 “Levels vs. Configurations, Revisited”. Essays in Honor of Charles F. Hockett ed. by Frederick B. Agard et al., 49–59. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
2008 [1 1996] Intonational Phonology. 2nd ed.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan, B. Q.
1953 “Question Melodies in American English”. American Speech 281.181–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Stephen O.
1994Theory Groups and the Study of Language in North America: A social history. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2014 “Getting the Word Out: The early generativists’ multi-pronged efforts to diffuse their ideas”. Language 901.241–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, J. D. & G. F. Arnold
1961Intonation of Colloquial English: A practical handbook. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Palmer, Harold E[dward]
1922English Intonation, with Systematic Exercises. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Paratore, Angela
1959Review of An Intensive Course in English by Robert Lado & Charles C. Fries, 41 vols. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 1954–1958) Language 351.354–361.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
1980The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT. Pike, Kenneth L[ee] 1945 The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L.
1947a “Grammatical Prerequisites to Phonemic Analysis”. Word 31.155–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1947bPhonemics: A technique for reducing languages to writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Roach, Peter
1994 “Conversion between Prosodic Transcription Systems: Standard British and ToBI [Tones and Break Indices]”. Speech Communication 151.91–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trager, George L[eonard]
1950Review of Pike (1947b). Language 261.152–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trager, George L.
1964 “The Intonation System of American English”. In Honour of Daniel Jones ed. by David Abercrombie et al., 266–270. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Trager, George L. & Henry Lee Smith
1957 [1 1951] An Outline of English Structure. Washington, D.C.: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Wells, Rulon S[eymour]
1945 “The Pitch Phonemes of English”. Language 211.27–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, Rulon S.
1947aReview of Pike (1945). Language 231.255–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1947b “Immediate Constituents”. Language 231.81–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar