Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 43:3 (2016) ► pp.301–342

Drawing Syntax before Syntactic Trees

Stephen Watkins Clark’s Sentence Diagrams (1847)

 | Université de Liège & Universität Stuttgart
This contribution investigates the syntactic conceptions of, and the diagramming system introduced by, the American grammarian Stephen Watkins Clark (1810–1901), who introduced the first comprehensive syntactic diagramming system. The structure of the English sentence is illustrated by agglutinated ‘bubbles’ expressing the relations between words by the means of their relative position. The sentence consists of two or three horizontally aligned bubbles containing words that are called principal elements. These principal elements can be complemented with adjunct elements, that appear in bubbles attached below them. For grammatical words the conventions differ depending on whether the grammatical word is a preposition or a conjunction. Coordination is never named as such, but there is an orthogonal abstract relation that connects elements performing the same role in a “compound” construction. The system allows recursivity in two different ways: by wrapping bubbles into other bubbles, thus following a mereological logic (i.e., partwhole relations) close to IC analysis or by hierarchically aggregating bubbles that resemble dependency trees. Clark’s conceptions thus prefigure modern graphical formalizations.
Published online: 21 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.43.3.03maz
References (62)
References
A. Primary sources
Barnard, Frederick Augustus Porter. 1836. Analytic Grammar, with symbolic illustration. New York: French.Google Scholar
Barrett, Solomon Jr. 1845. Principles of English Grammar: being a compendious treatise on the languages, English, Latin, Greek, German, Spanish, and French. Founded on the immutable principle of the relation which one words sustains to another. Albany, N. Y.: Munsell.Google Scholar
Becker, Karl Ferdinand. 1836. Ausführliche deutsche Grammatik als Kommentar der Schulgrammatik. Frankfurt: Kettembeil.Google Scholar
Billroth, Johann Gustav Friedrich. 1832. Lateinische Syntax für die obern Klassen gelehrter Schulen. Leipzig: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1984 [1933]. Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brown, James. 1831. The American Grammar. Prepared for the use of Schools by the author. Philadelphia: Clark & Raser.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. Mouton: The Hague. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Stephen Watkins. 1847. Science of English Language. A practical Grammar: in which words, phrases, and sentences are classified according to their offices, and their relations to each other. Illustrated by a complete system of diagrams. New York: A. S. Barnes & Co. [= PG1 ]. Revised edition 1855 [= PG2 ].Google Scholar
. 1851. Analysis of the English Language, with a complete classification of sentences and phrases according to their grammatical structure; designed as an introduction to English grammar. New York: A. S. Barnes & Co. [= AE].Google Scholar
. 1856. First Lessons in English Grammar. New York: A. S. Barnes & Co.Google Scholar
. 1859. A Key to Clark’s Grammar. New York: A. S. Barnes & Co. [= Key ].Google Scholar
. 1870a. The Normal Grammar: Analytic & Synthetic. Illustrated by diagrams. New York: A. S. Barnes & Co. [= NG].Google Scholar
. 1870b. A Key to Clark’s Normal Grammar, in which the analysis of the sentences in the grammar are indicated by the diagrams, and the examples of grammatic fallacies are corrected. New York: A. S. Barnes & Co.Google Scholar
. 1871. A Critical Grammar. New York: A. S. Barnes & Co.Google Scholar
. 1874. English Grammar for Beginners, with illustrations and diagrams. New York & Chicago: A. S. Barnes & Co.Google Scholar
. 1875. Easy Lessons in Language; with illustrations and diagrams. New York & Chicago: A. S. Barnes & Co.Google Scholar
. 1876. Brief English Grammar, with illustrations and diagrams. New York & Chicago: A. S. Barnes & Co.Google Scholar
Kern, Franz. 1883. Zur Methodik des deutschen Unterrichts. Berlin: Stricker.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine & Lancelot, Claude. 1660. Grammaire générale et raisonnée; contenant les fondements de l’art de parler; expliquez d’une manière claire et naturelle; les raisons de ce qui est commun à toutes les langues et des principales différences qui s’y rencontrent; et plusieurs remarques nouvelles sur la langue françoise. Paris: Pierre le Petit.Google Scholar
Lowth, Robert. 1762. A Short Introduction to English Grammar with critical notes. London: Millar & Dodsley.Google Scholar
Murray, Lindley. 1795. English Grammar, adapted to the different classes of learners. With an appendix, containing rules and observations for promoting perspicuity in speaking and writing. York, England: Wilson, Spence & Mawman.Google Scholar
. 1828a [1808]. An English Grammar, comprehending the principles and the rules of the language. Illustrated by appropriate exercises and a key to the exercises. A new edition. Vol. I1. New York: Thomas Wilson & Co.Google Scholar
. 1828b [1808]. An English Grammar, comprehending the principles and the rules of the language. Illustrated by appropriate exercises and a key to the exercises. A new edition. Vol. II1. New York: Thomas Wilson & Co.Google Scholar
Nida, Eugene A. 1960. A Synopsis of English Syntax. Norman, Oklahoma: University Book Exchange.Google Scholar
Peirce, Oliver B. 1843. The Grammar of the English Language. Watertown, New York: Knowlton & Rice.Google Scholar
Putnam, John March. 1831 [1828]. English Grammar, with an improved syntax. Concord: Hoag & Atwood.Google Scholar
Reed, Alonzo & Brainerd Kellogg. 1876. Graded Lessons in English. New York: Clark & Maynard.Google Scholar
. 1877. Higher Lessons in English. New York: Clark & Maynard.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry. 1892. A New English Grammar: Logical and historical. Part I: Introduction, phonology, and accidence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien. 1959. Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
. 2015. Elements of Structural Syntax. Translated by Timothy Osborne and Sylvain Kahane. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wundt, Wilhelm. 1900. Völkerpsychologie. Vol. I: Die Sprache. Leipzig: Kröner.Google Scholar
B. Secondary sources
Aarts, Bas & April McMahon, eds. 2006. The Handbook of English Linguistics, Malden, Oxford–Victoria: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, Tilman & Hans-Ulrich Krieger, eds. 1997. Proceedings of the 5th Meeting of the Mathematics of Language (MOL5). Saarbrücken: DFKI.Google Scholar
Bingen, Jean, André Coupez & Francine Mawet. 1980. Recherches de linguistique: hommage à Maurice Leroy, Bruxelles: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Brittain, Richard Coutler. 1973. A Critical History of Systems of Sentence Diagramming in English. Austin: University of Texas [Ph.D., unpublished.]Google Scholar
Caddéo, Sandrine, Marie-Noëlle Roubaud, Magali Rouquier & Frédéric Sabio, eds. 2012. Penser les langues avec Claire Blanche-Benveniste. Aix-en-Provence: Presses universitaires de Provence.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1980. “Un pécurseur méconnu de la syntaxe structurale: H. Tiktin”. Bingen et al.. 1980.48–62.Google Scholar
Downey, Charlotte. 1991. “Trends that Shaped the Development of 19th Century American Grammar Writing”. Leitner 1991.27–38.Google Scholar
Florey, Kitty Burns. 2006. Sister Bernadette’s Barking Dog: The quirky history and lost art of diagramming sentences. Hoboken: Melville House Publishing.Google Scholar
Gammon, E. G. 1963. “On Representing Syntactic Structure”. Language 391.369–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Görlach, Manfred. 1998. An Annotated Bibliography of 19th-Century Grammars of English. Amsterdam & Philadephia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graffi, Giorgio. 2001. 200 Years of Syntax: A critical survey. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hagen, Karl. [undated]. Polysyllabic [online blog] <[URL]>
Hays, David G. 1965. An Annotated Bibliography of Publications on Dependency Theory. Santa Monica, Calif.: The RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 2010. An Introduction to Word Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Sentence Diagramming”. Language Log [online blog] <[URL]>
Huston, Jon. 1954. An Analysis of English Grammar Textbooks Used in American Schools before 1850. University of Pittsburgh. [Ph.D., unpublished; cf. Nietze. 1961: 110]Google Scholar
Kahane, Sylvain. 1997. “Bubble Trees and Syntactic Representations”. Becker & Krieger. 1997.70–76.Google Scholar
. 2012. “De l’analyse en grille à la modélisation des entassements”. Caddéo et al.. 2010.101–114.Google Scholar
Law, Vivien. 2003. The History of Linguistics in Europe, from Plato to 1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leitner, Gerhard, ed. English Traditional Grammars: an International Perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Linn, Andrew. 2006. “English Grammar Writing”. Aarts & McMahon. 2006.72–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor. 1988. Dependency Syntax. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Nietze, John A. 1961. Old Textbooks: Spelling, Grammar, Reading, Arithmetic, Geography, American History, Civil Government, Physiology, Penmanship, Art, Music, as Taught in the Common Schools from Colonial Days to 1900. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Osborne, Timothy. 2006. “Shared Material and Grammar: Toward a dependency grammar theory of non-gapping coordination for English and German”. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 251.39–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Percival, W. Keith. 1976. “On the Historical Source of Immediate-Constituent Analysis”. <[URL]>. [online article] DOI logo
. 2007. “On the Historical Source of Immediate-Constituent Analysis. Further thougths”. <[URL]>. [online article]
Swiggers, Pierre. 1997. Histoire de la pensée linguistique: analyse du langage et réflexion linguistique dans la culture occidentale, de l’Antiquité au XIX e siècle, Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid, ed. 2008a. Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-writing in Eighteenth Century England. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008b. “Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar Writing: An introduction”. Tieken-Boon van Ostade. 2008a.1–14.Google Scholar
Trips, Carola. 2015. English Syntax in Three Dimensions: History-Synchrony-Diachrony. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Mazziotta, Nicolas, Jacques François & Sylvain Kahane
2024. Des outils graphiques pour étudier le langage et les langues. Les diagrammes en linguistique. Travaux de linguistique n° 87:2 ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Mazziotta, Nicolas, Jacques François & Sylvain Kahane
2024. Vers une base de données raisonnée des modélisations graphiques pour étudier le langage et les langues. Travaux de linguistique n° 87:2 ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Léon, Jacqueline
2021. The Computational Turn and Formalisation in Neo-Bloomfieldian Distributionalism. In Automating Linguistics [History of Computing, ], ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Hudson, Richard
2020. Towards a pedagogical linguistics. Pedagogical Linguistics 1:1 ► pp. 8 ff. DOI logo
Mazziotta, Nicolas
2020. Dependency in early sentence diagrams. In Chapters of Dependency Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 212], ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Mazziotta, Nicolas
2023. Syntaxe en n dimensions : choisir et représenter les espaces d’analyse. Travaux de linguistique n° 84-85:1 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Mazziotta, Nicolas & András Imrényi
2020. Aspects of the theory and history of dependency grammar. In Chapters of Dependency Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 212], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.