Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 43:3 (2016) ► pp.363–391

Gender Asymmetries in Iroquoian Languages and their Cultural Correlates

 | Adam Mickiewicz University
This article examines the approaches to grammatical gender in Northern Iroquoian languages, ranging from the earliest references made by French missionaries in the 1630s to contemporary studies. The author focuses on two motifs in descriptions of Iroquoian gender: the supposedly ‘primitive’ nature of its morphological expression, which was mentioned predominantly in 18th-century accounts of Huron, and the asymmetries between the expression of masculine and feminine reference, which have been the main topic of the accounts of Mohawk, Oneida and Onondaga since the late 19th century. By tracing the two motifs the close links that were established between gender and culture patterns are illustrated, frequently leading to contradictory explanations concerning diachronic scenarios as well as more general impressionistic properties attributed to the languages and their speakers.
Published online: 21 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.43.3.05kil
References (60)
References
Abbott, Clifford. 1984. “Two Feminine Genders in Oneida”. Anthropological Linguistics 26:2.125–137.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2016. How Gender Shapes the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andresen, Julie T. 1990. Linguistics in America, 1769–1924: Critical history. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barbeau, Marius. 1915. Classification of Iroquoian Radicals with Subjective Pronominal Prefixes. Ottawa: Government Printing Bureau. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beatty, John Joseph. 1974. Mohawk Morphology. Greeley, Colo.: Museum of Anthropology, University of Northern Colorado.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1909. “Notes on the Iroquois Language”. Putnam Anniversary Volume: Anthropological essays presented to Frederic Ward Putnam in honor of his seventieth birthday, April 16, 1909 ed. by Franz Boas, 427–460. New York: G. E. Stechert & Co.Google Scholar
Bonvillain, Nancy. 1973. A Grammar of Akwesasne Mohawk. Ottawa: National Museum of Man, National Museums of Canada. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruyas, James. 1862. Radical Words of the Mohawk Language, with their Derivatives. New York: Cramoisy Press.Google Scholar
Bryant, Doreen. 2003. Genus-Systeme im Wandel. Spezifität, Animazität und Femininum im Mohawk. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1977. “The Evolution of Third Person Verb Agreement in the Iroquoian Languages”. Mechanisms of Syntactic Change ed. by Charles N. Li, 493–524. Austin, Tex.: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1999. “Florescence as a Force in Grammaticalization”. Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative linguistics and grammaticalization ed. by Spike Gildea, 39–64. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2002. “Masculine and Feminine in the Northern Iroquoian Languages”. Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture ed. by Nick J. Enfield, 99–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2014. A Grammar of the Seneca Language. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Charlevoix, P[ierre François Xavier] de. 1744. Histoire et description générale de la Nouvelle France, avec le journal historique d’un voyage fait par ordre du roi dans l’Amérique septentrionnale. Vol. III1. Paris: Chez Rolin Fils, Libraire. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Contini-Morava, Ellen & Marcin Kilarski. 2013. “Functions of Nominal Classification”. Language Sciences 401.263–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuoq, Jean-André. 1866. Études philologiques sur quelques langues sauvages de l’Amérique. Montreal: Dawson Brothers. (Repr., East Ardsley: S.R. Publishers, 1966.)Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2013. “A History of Iroquoian Gender Marking”. Language Typology and Historical Contingency: In honor of Johanna Nichols ed. by Balthasar Bickel, Lenore A. Grenoble, David A. Peterson & Alan Timberlake, 283–298. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dinneen, Francis P. 1990. “A 17th-century Account of Mohawk”. North American Contributions to the History of Linguistics ed. by Francis P. Dinneen & E. F. K. Koerner, 67–86. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Alexander, ed. 1920. Huron Manuscripts from Rev. Pierre Potier’s Collection. Toronto: C. W. James.Google Scholar
Freilich, Morris. 1958. “Cultural Persistence among the Modern Iroquois”. Anthropos 531.473–483.Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives. 1996. “The Description of the Native Languages of North America before Boas”. Languages ed. by Ives Goddard (= Handbook of North American Indians, 17), 17–42. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Grammatical Gender in Algonquian”. Papers of the Thirty-Third Algonquian Conference ed. by H. Christoph Wolfart, 195–231. Winnipeg, Man.: University of Manitoba.
Hale, Horatio, ed. 1883. The Iroquois Book of Rites. Philadelphia: D.G. Brinton. (Repr., with an Introduction by William N. Fenton, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1963.)Google Scholar
Hanzeli, Victor Egon. 1969. Missionary Linguistics in New France. A study of seventeenth- and eighteenth-century descriptions of American Indian languages. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Head, Brian F. 1978. “Respect Degrees in Pronominal Reference”. Universals of Human Language ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith A. Moravcsik, vol. III1: Word Structure, 151–211. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1986 [1772]. Abhandlung über den Ursprung der Sprache. Berlin: Christian Friedrich Voß. (Translated, with afterwords, by Alexander Gode, in On the Origin of Language. Jean-Jacques Rousseau “Essay on the origin of languages”, Johann Gottfried Herder “Essay on the origin of language” ed. by John Moran & Alexander Gode, 85–166. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 1986.)Google Scholar
Hewitt, J[ohn] N[apoleon] B[rinton]. 1903. “Iroquoian Cosmology. First part”. Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution 1899–1900 211.127–339.Google Scholar
Hewitt, J. N. B. 1928. “Iroquoian Cosmology. Second part”. Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution 1925–1926 431.449–819.Google Scholar
Jaucourt, Louis de. 1765. “Les Hurons”. Encyclopédie ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers ed. by Denis Diderot & Jean Le Rond d’Alembert, vol. VIII1, p. 3561. Neufchastel: Samuel Faulche & Compagnie.Google Scholar
Kilarski, Marcin. 2007. “Algonquian and Indo-European Gender in a Historiographic Perspective”. Historiographia Linguistica 34:2/3.333–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Cherokee Classificatory Verbs: Their place in the study of American Indian languages”. Historiographia Linguistica 36:1.39–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Nominal Classification: A history of its study from the classical period to the present. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 121.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. 2002. “Toward a History of Americanist Linguistics”. Toward a History of American Linguistics by E. F. K. Koerner, 17–37. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lafitau, Joseph-François. 1724. Mœurs des sauvages ameriquains. Vol. II1. Paris: Saugrain l’aîné.Google Scholar
Lagarde, Pierrette L., ed. 1980. Le verbe huron: Étude morphologique d’après une description grammaticale de la seconde moitié du XVIIe siècle. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Lahontan, Louis Armand. 1703. New Voyages to North-America. Giving a full account of the customs, commerce, religion, and strange opinions of the savages of that country with political remarks upon the courts of Portugal and Denmark and the present state of the commerce of those countries. Vol. II1. London: Printed for H. Bonwicke [etc.].Google Scholar
Lounsbury, Floyd G. 1953. Oneida Verb Morphology. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Marcoux, Joseph. 1828. “Grammaire iroquoise, ou, la langue iroquoise réduite en principes fixes”. [Unpublished MS, Caughnawaga.]Google Scholar
Michelson, Karin. 1981. “A Philological Investigation into Seventeenth-Century Mohawk”. International Journal of American Linguistics 47:2.91–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Gender in Oneida”. Gender across Languages: The linguistic representation of women and men ed. by Marlis Hellinger & Heiko Motschenbacher, vol. IV1, 2771–301. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1979. “Iroquoian”. The Languages of Native America: Historical and comparative assessment ed. by Lyle Campbell & Marianne Mithun, 133–212. Austin, Tex.: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Gender and Culture”. The Expression of Gender ed. by Greville G. Corbett, 131–160. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Monboddo, James Burnett. 1774 [1773]. Of the Origin and Progress of Language. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Printed for J. Balfour.Google Scholar
Olsen, Kirstin. 1994. Chronology of Women’s History. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Pyrlaeus, Johann Christoph. 1745–1751. Affixa nominum et verborum linguæ macquaicæ cum vocabulario ejusdem linguæ. [Unpublished MS, Pennsylvania Historical Society, Philadelphia.]Google Scholar
Sagard[-Théodat], Gabriel. 1998 [1632]. Le grand voyage du pays des Hurons; suivi du Dictionnaire de la langue huronne. Edited by Jack Warwick. Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal. [Originally published as Le grand voyage dv pays des Hvrons, situé en l’Amérique vers la mer douce. Paris: chez Denys Moreav, 1632.]Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1924. “The Grammarian and his Language”. American Mercury 11.149–155.Google Scholar
Schreyer, Rüdiger. 1996. “Take your Pen and Write: Learning Huron. A documented historical sketch”. … and the Word was God: Missionary linguistics and missionary grammar ed. by Even Hovdhaugen, 77–121. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Smith, Erminnie A. 1884. “Iroquois Pronouns”. Science 10 Oct. 1884, p. 351. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1885a. “The Customs and the Language of the Iroquois”. The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 141.244–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1885b. “Disputed Points concerning Iroquois Pronouns”. Proceedings of the American Society for the Advancement of Science 331.606–609.Google Scholar
Straus, Anne Terry & Robert Brightman. 1982. “The Implacable Raspberry”. Papers in Linguistics 151.97–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thwaites, Reuben Gold, ed. 1896–1901. The Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents: Travels and explorations of the Jesuit missionaries in New France, 1610–1791. The original French, Latin, and Italian texts, with English translations and notes. 731 vols. Cleveland, Ohio: Burrows Brothers.Google Scholar
Tooker, Elisabeth. 1964. An Ethnography of the Huron Indians, 1615–1649. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
. 1984. “Women in Iroquois Society”. Extending the Rafters: Interdisciplinary approaches to Iroquoian studies ed. by Michael K. Foster, Jack Campisi & Marianne Mithun, 109–123. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Trigger, Bruce G.. 1976. The Children of Aataentsic: A history of the Huron people to 1660. 21 vols. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkie, John. 1831. “Grammar of the Huron Language, by a missionary of the village of Huron Indians at Lorette, near Quebec, found amongst the papers of the mission, and translated from the Latin”. Transactions of the Literary and Historical Society of Quebec 21.94–198.Google Scholar
Zeisberger, David. 1888. Essay of an Onondaga Grammar, or a short introduction to learn the Onondaga al. Maqua Tongue. Philadelphia: [no indication of publisher.] [Originally published in The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 111.442–453, 121.65–75, 233–239, 325–340, 1887–1888.]Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Joseph, John E.
2022. Review of Kilarski (2021): A History of the Study of the Indigenous Languages of North America. Historiographia Linguistica 49:2-3 ► pp. 405 ff. DOI logo
Kilarski, Marcin
2018. American Indian Languages in the Eyes of 17th-Century French and British Missionaries. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 53:s1 ► pp. 295 ff. DOI logo
Kilarski, Marcin
2021. Erminnie A. Smith (1836–1886). Historiographia Linguistica 48:2-3 ► pp. 228 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. A History of the Study of the Indigenous Languages of North America [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 129], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.