François Thurot’s Discours préliminaire (1796), a first attempt at a historiography of grammar, sums up the language theories of the philosophes, while prefiguring the 19th century in both his concept of language and his attitude towards the science of language. He accepts, for instance, the theory that the perfection of a language reflects the progress of the mind but rejects the metaphysical speculation on the origin of language that characteristically accompanied such a theory. And although Thurot, like his contemporaries, still preoccupies himself with the method of logico-linguistic analysis which would lead to a langue bien faite, his study opens up to a new variety of linguistic phenomena in the vernacular. Thus, his view of language embraces both the mechanical reductionism aimed at scientific language with its pretention to universality as well as the creative dynamism of discursive language with its recognition of cultural relativity. Furthermore, Thurot assimilates the interest in the genetic relationship among languages, that was already in the air, to the historicism of the philosophes, whose historical tableaux unfolded within their theories of language.
Thurot’s interest in natural language is an outgrowth of the prevailing ‘climate of opinion’. The data-oriented approach to language had begun with the invention of the printing press, from which time there was an ever increasing accumulation and distribution of material on non-European languages. The French Revolution was to dramatize the importance of discursive language, since the unification of the nation depended, in part, on the democratization and standardization of daily language. Such a climate proved favorable for subsequent work on genetic classification and on Indo-European in the 19th century.
Aarsleff, Hans. 1967. The Study of Language in England 1780–1860. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
Aarsleff, Hans. 1970. “The History of Linguistics and Professor Chomsky”. Lg 461. 570–85.
Arens, Hans. 1955. Sprachwissenschaft; der Gang ihrer Entwicklung von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. Freiburg & Munich: Κ. Alber. (2nd ed., 1969.)
Arnauld, Antoine (1612–94), and Pierre Nicole (1625–95). 1965 [1662]. La Logique ou l’art de penser, ed. by Pierre Clair and François Girbal. Paris: P.U.F.
Brunot, Ferdinand. 1967 [1911]. Histoire de la langue française. Volume IX1: La Révolution et l’Empire. Paris: Α. Colin.
Certeau, Michel de, Dominique Julia, and Jacques Revel. 1975. Une politique de la langue: La Révolution française et les patois. Paris: Gallimard.
Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York & London: Harper & Row.
Chouillet, Jacques. 1972. “Descartes et le problème de l’origine des langues au dix-huitième siècle”. Dix-huitième Siècle 41.39–60.
Condillac, Etienne Bonnot de(1714–80). 1775. Cours d’études pour l’instruction du Prince de Parme, Grammaire. Paris: Impr. royale.
Condillac, Etienne Bonnot de(1714–80). 1947–51. Oeuvres philosophiques. Text established and presented by George Le Roy. 31 vols. Paris: P.U.F.
Condillac, Etienne Bonnot de(1714–80). 1973 [1746]. Essai sur l’origine des connaissances humaines, Ed. by Charles Porset. Auvers-sur-Oise: Galilée.
Condorcet, Marie-Jean-Antoine-Nicolas Caritat(1743–94). 1970 [1794]. Esquisse d’un tableau historique des progrès de l’esprit humain. Text reviewed and presented by O. H. Prior. Paris: Vrin.
Harris, James(1709–80). 1972 [1796]. Hermès ou recherches philosophiques sur la grammaire universelle. Translation and remarks by François Thurot (1796), introduction and notes by André Joly (1972). Geneva: Droz.
Jacob, André. 1973. Genèse de la pensée linguistique. Paris: A. Colin.
Jacob, André. 1976. Introduction à la philosophie du langage. Paris: Gallimard.
Joly, André. 1970. See Thurot 1970 [1796].
Joly, André. 1972a. See Harris 1972 [1796].
Joly, André. 1972b. “Cartésianisme et linguistique cartésienne: Mythe ou réalité?” BRPh 111.86–94.
Joly, André. 1976. “James Harris et la problématique des parties du discours à l’époque classique”. History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics ed. by Herman Parret, 410–30. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.
Joly, André. 1977. “La linguistique cartésienne: Une erreur mémorable”. La Grammaire générale; des Modistes aux Idéologues éd. par André Joly et Jean Stéfanini, 165–99. Villeneuve-d’Ascq: Publications de l’Univ. de Lille III.
Juliard, Pierre. 1970. Philosophies of Language in Eighteenth-Century France. The Hague: Mouton.
Kitchin, Joanna. 1965. Un journal “philosophique”: “La Décade” (1794–1807). Paris: M. J. Minard Lettres Modernes.
Koerner, E. F. K.1976. “Towards a Historiography of Linguistics: 19th and 20th century paradigms”. History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics ed. by Herman Parret, 685–718. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.
Malkiel, Yakov, [and Margaret Langdon]. 1969. “History and Histories of Linguistics”. RomPh 221.530–66[-574].
Mounin, Georges. 1967. Histoire de la linguistique: Des origines au XXe siècle. Paris: P.U.F.
Robins, Robert H.1968. A Short History of Linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.
Scaglione, Aldo. 1972. The Classical Theory of Composition from its Origins to the Present: A historical survey. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.
Thurot, François(1768–1832). 1970 [1796]. Tableau des progrès de la science grammaticale: Discours préliminaire à “Hermès”. Introduction and notes by André Joly. Bordeaux: Ducros.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Koerner, E.F. Konrad
2015. Linguistics, History of. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, ► pp. 215 ff.
Fournier, Jean-Marie
2009. Représentations du sens linguistique III. In Représentations du sens linguistique III [Champs linguistiques, ], ► pp. 319 ff.
Koerner, E.F.K.
1995. History of Linguistics: The Field. In Concise History of the Language Sciences, ► pp. 3 ff.
Revue de Synthèse, Editors
1988. Pour une hisidire des idées Linguistiques. Revue de Synthèse 109:3-4 ► pp. 429 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.