Theodor Bibliander (1504–1564) was an important link in developing the concept of the language family that is now called Indo-European. ‘Lector’ for the Greek of the Septuagint at the Münsterschule in Zürich (Zwingli’s successor), Bibliander had early showed aptitude for languages and had devoted himself particularly to Hebrew and related Semitic tongues. As exegete he interpreted the events at Babel (Genesis 10, 11) from the perspective of this knowledge. The ‘confounding’ of language, although it had occurred suddenly, still permitted the resulting languages to show kinship on the order of dialect variations. Thus the descendants of Shem, settling compactly in the vicinity, still gave striking evidence of their close-knit linguistic consanguinity. But the surviving evidence was not so obvious for the descendants of Japheth, who had scattered over Europe as part of God’s plan to populate the earth. Like all languages, these languages too were subject to inevitable change, an inescapable quality of all human institutions. Yet a closer look could still discern this relationship, as evidenced, for instance, in Greek (stemming from Javan), German-(ic) (stemming from Gomer), and Slavic (stemming from Magog). Bibliander’s study of Hebrew had sharpened his sensitivity to the inner structure of the word and to the processes of inflection and derivation, which were manifestations of the ratio which underlay all languages, even ‘barbarian’. Bibliander chose as his examples to prove the ‘Japhetic’ relationship parallel Greek and German affixes. Although not all of his examples stand the test of modern etymology, the procedure remains exemplary, and helped to give credence to the belief in the existence of a ‘Japhetic’ or ‘European’ family of languages.
1953 “Abraham Mylius on Historical Linguistics”. PMLA 681.535–54.
Metcalf, George J.
1963a “The Views of Konrad Gesner on Language”. Studies in Germanic Languages and Literatures ed. Erich P. Hofacker, 15–26. St.Louis: Washington Univ. Press.
Metcalf, George J.
1963b “Konrad Gesner’s Views on the Germanic Languages”. Monatshefte 55.\A9-56.
Metcalf, George J.
1974 “The Indo-European Hypothesis in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries”. Studies in the History of Linguistics: Traditions and Paradigms ed. by Dell Hymes, 233–57. Bloomington & London: Indiana Univ. Press.
Robins, R. H.
1973 “The History of Language Classification”. Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, vol. 111: Diachronie, Areal and Typological Linguistics, 3–44. The Hague: Mouton.
Staehelin, Ernst
1942 “Die biblischen Vorlesungen Theodor Biblianders in einer Abschrift seines Bruders Heinrich Bibliander”. Zwingliana 71.522–526.
Weisz, Leo
1939–40 “Quellen zur Reformationsgeschichte des Großmünsters in Zürich”. Zwingliana 71.65–90,172–202.
Zwingliana = Zwingliana: Mitteilungen zur Geschichte Zwingiis und der Reformation
(subtitle varies). Zürich 1910ff (appears at irregular intervals, several ‘Hefte’ making up a volume).
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Jankowsky, K.R.
2006. Early Historical and Comparative Studies. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 43 ff.
Jankowsky, Kurt R.
1995. Early Historical and Comparative Studies in Scandinavia, the Low Countries, and German-speaking Lands. In Concise History of the Language Sciences, ► pp. 179 ff.
Olender, Maurice
2023. Problematic metaphors for the temporality of languages. Intellectual History Review 33:3 ► pp. 375 ff.
Van Hal, Toon & John Considine
2010. Classifying and Comparing Languages in Post-Renaissance Europe (1600–1800). Language & History 53:2 ► pp. 63 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.