Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 8:2/3 (1981) ► pp.403–429

A Dissenting Grammarian Qutrub on Declension

 | University of Nijmegen
This paper is concerned with a theory held by the Arab grammarian Qutrub (d.206/821) with regard to the inflectional vowels of the noun in Arabic. Contrary to what most grammarians believed, he asserted that these vowels do not serve to indicate (syntactic) functions, but to prevent the combination of two consonants. We examine the methodological background of this theory and argue in particular that (1) Qutrub’s theory about the inflectional vowels is connected — both substantially and terminologically — with his ideas about speech in general. He regards the Arabic language as essentially flexible, since speakers are allowed to choose among alternatives; (2) this same idea is reflected by Qutrub’s interest in ‘addād, i.e., homonyms with contrary meanings, and in mutashābihāt, i.e., Qur’ānic verses which seemingly contradict each other; (3) the clue to his theory is the term cilla “cause”. Basing himself on the doctrine of his Muctazilite teacher al-Nazzām, Qutrub argues that in order to be valid linguistic reasoning must meet certain logical conditions, in particular the condition of reversibility: unless cause and effect, or sign and referent, coexist they cannot be regarded as such. As there is no one-to-one relation between the inflectional vowels and the alleged cause, the accepted opinion about declension cannot be correct; (4) Qutrub’s own solution — the inflectional vowels are used for euphonic reasons — coincides with his interest in phonetic variants and pausal phenomena.
Published online: 1 January 1981
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.8.2-3.13ver
References (79)
References
A. Primary sources
cAbd al-Jabbār, Mughnī’Ibrāhīm al-’Abyārī = ’Abū l-Ḥasan cAbd al-Jabbār b. ’Aḥmad al-Ha-mādhānī, Al-Mughnī fī ’abwāb al-tawḥīd wa-l-cadl. Vol. VII1. Ed. by ’Ibrāhīm al-’Abyārī. Cairo: Dār al-Kutub, 1961.Google Scholar
a. Ṭayyib, MarMuḥammad ’Abū l-Faḍl ’Ibrāhīm. = ’Abū l-Ṭayyib cAbd al-Raḥmān b. cAlī al-Lughawī, Marātib al-naḥwiyyīn. Ed. by Muḥammad ’Abū l-Faḍl ’Ibrāhīm. Cairo: Nahḍa, 1954.Google Scholar
’Ashc. MaqHelmut Ritter. = ’Abū l-Ḥasan cAlī b. ’Ismācīl al-’Ashcarī, Maqālāt al-’islāmiyyīn. Ed. by Helmut Ritter. Zweite Auflage. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1963.Google Scholar
’Astar, ShShMuḥammad Nūr al-Ḥasan, Muḥammad al-Zafzāf, Muḥammad Muḥyī al-Dīn cAbd al-Ḥamīd. = Raḍī al-Dīn Muḥammad b.al-Ḥasan al-’Astarābādhī, Sharḥ Shāfiyat Ibn al-Ḥājib. Ed. by Muḥammad Nūr al-Ḥasan, Muḥammad al-Zafzāf, Muḥammad Muḥyī al-Dīn cAbd al-Ḥamīd. 41 vols. Cairo: Ḥijāzī, n.d.
’Azh. TahdhMuḥammad cAbd al-Salām Hārūn. = ’Abū Manṣūr Muḥammad b. ’Aḥmad al-’Azharī, Tahdhīb al-lugha. Ed. by Muḥammad cAbd al-Salām Hārūn. 151 vols. Cairo: Dār al-Kātib al-cArabī, 1964–67.Google Scholar
Bāq. TamhRichard J. McCarthy. = ’Abū Bakr Muḥammad b. al-Ṭayyib al-Bāqillānī, Kitāb al-tamhīd. Ed. by Richard J. McCarthy. Beyrouth: Librairie Orientale, 1957.Google Scholar
b. ’Anb. ’AḍdādMartin Theodor Houtsma = ’Abū Bakr Muḥammad b. al-Qāsim al-’Anbārī, Kitāb al-’aḍdād. Ed. by Martin Theodor Houtsma (1851–1943). Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1881.Google Scholar
b. ’Anb. ’AsrCristian Friedrich Seybold. = ’Abū l-Barakāt cAbd al-Raḥmān b. Muḥammad al-’Anbārī, ’Asrār al-carabiyya. Ed. by Cristian Friedrich Seybold (1859–1921). Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1886.Google Scholar
b. ’Anb. ’InṣGotthold Weil. = ’Abū l-Barakāt cAbd al-Raḥmān b. Muḥammad al-’Anbārī, Kitāb al-’inṣāf fī masā’il al-khilāf bayna l-naḥwiyyīna l-baṣriyyīna wa-l-kufiyyīn. Ed. by Gotthold Weil (1882–1960). Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1913.Google Scholar
b. ’Anb. LumAttia Amer [cAṭiyya c Āmir]. = ’Abū l-Barakāt cAbd al-Raḥmān b. Muḥammad al-’Anbārī, Lumac al-’adilla fī ’uṣūl al-naḥw. Ed. by Attia Amer [cAṭiyya c Āmir]. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1963.Google Scholar
b. ’Anb. NuzhaAttia Amer [cAṭiyya cĀmir] = ’Abū l-Barakāt cAbd al-Raḥmān b. Muḥammad al-’Anbārī, Nuzhat al-’alibbā’ fī ṭabaqāt al-’udabā’. Ed. by Attia Amer [cAṭiyya cĀmir]. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1963.Google Scholar
b. Fār. ṢāḥMoustafa Chouémi [Muṣṭafā Shu’aymī]. = ’Abū l-Ḥusayn ’Aḥmad b. Fāris, Al-Ṣāḥibī fī fiqh al-lugha. Ed. by Moustafa Chouémi [Muṣṭafā Shu’aymī]. Beyrouth: A. Badran, 1964.Google Scholar
b. Hish. MughnīMāzin al-Mubārak and Muḥammad cAlī Ḥamdallāh = Jamāl al-Dīn ’Abū Muḥammad cAbdallāh b. Yūsuf Ibn Hishām, Mughnī al-labīb can kutub al-’acārīb. Ed. by Māzin al-Mubārak and Muḥammad cAlī Ḥamdallāh. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 1969.Google Scholar
b. cIm. Shadh. = ’Abu l-Falaḥ cAbd al-Ḥayy b. al-cImād, Shadharāt al-dhahab fī ṭabaqāt man dhahab. 81 vols. Cairo: Maktabat al-Quds, 1931–33.Google Scholar
b. Jin. KhaṣMuḥammad cAlī al-Najjār. = ’Abū l-Fatḥ cUthmān Ibn Jinnī, Al-Khaṣā’ iṣ. Ed. by Muḥammad cAlī al-Najjār. Cairo, 1952–56 (Repr., Beirut: Dār al-Hudā, n.d.).Google Scholar
b. Khall. Waf’Iḥsān cAbbās. = Shams al-Dīn ’Aḥmad b. Muḥammad Ibn Khallikān, Wafayāt al-’acyān wa-’anbā’ ’abnā’ al-zamān. Ed. by ’Iḥsān cAbbās. 71 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Thaqāfa [1968].Google Scholar
b. Maḍ. RaddShawqī Ḍayf = ’Abū l-cAbbās ’Aḥmad Ibn Maḍā’ al-Qurṭubī, Kitāb al-radd calā l-nuḥāt. Ed. by Shawqī Ḍayf. Cairo: Dār al-Fikr al-cArabī, 1947.Google Scholar
b. Murt. ṬabSusanna Diwald-Wilzer. = ’Aḥmad b. Yaḥyā Ibn al-Murtaḍā, Ṭabaqāt al-Muctazila. Ed. by Susanna Diwald-Wilzer. Beirut: Imprimerie Catholique, 1961.Google Scholar
b. Nad. FihrGustav Flügel. = ’Abū l-Faraj Muḥammad b. ’Abī Yacqūb Ibn al-Nadīm al-Warrāq, Kitāb al-Fihrist. Ed. by Gustav Flügel (1802–1870). 21 vols. Leipzig, 1871–72.Google Scholar
b. Qāḍ. Ṭab. = ’Abū Bakr Taqī al-Dīn Ibn Qāḍī Shuhba, Ṭabaqāt al-nuḥāt wa-l-lughawiyyīn. Ms. Damascus Ẓāhiriyya 438 ta’rīkh.
b. Sarr. ’Uṣūl = ’Abū Bakr Muḥammad b. al-Sarī Ibn al-Sarrāj, Kitāb ’uṣūl al-naḥw. Ms. British Museum Or. 2808.
b. Sid. Mukh. = ’Abū l-Ḥasan cAlī b. ’Ismācīl Ibn Sīda al-Mursī, Kitāb al-mukhaṣṣaṣ. 171 vols. Ed. Būlāq, 1898–1903.Google Scholar
b. cUṣf. MumtFakhr al-Dīn Qabāwa. = cAlī b. Mu’min Ibn cUṣfūr, Al-Mumtic fī l-taṣrîf. Ed. by Fakhr al-Dīn Qabāwa. 21 vols. Aleppo: The Arabian Press, 1970.Google Scholar
b. Yacīsh, SharḥGustav Jahn = Muwaffaq al-Dīn Yacīsh b. Yacīsh, Sharḥ al-Mufaṣṣal. Ed. by Gustav Jahn (1837–1917). Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus, 1882–86.Google Scholar
cIqdMuḥammad Sacīd al-cAryān = ’Abū cUmar Ibn cAbd Rabbihi al-’Andalusī, Al-cIqd al-farīd. Ed. by Muḥammad Sacīd al-cAryān. Cairo: Maṭbacat al-Istiqāma, 1953.Google Scholar
Jāḥiẓ, BayānḤasan al-Sandūbī = ’Abū cUthmān cAmr b. Baḥr al-Jāḥiẓ, Al-Bayān wa-l-tabyīn. Ed. by Ḥasan al-Sandūbī. 31 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, n.d.
Khaṭīb, Ta’rīkh = ’Abū Bakr’Aḥmad b. cAlī al-Khaṭīb al-Baghdādī, Ta’rīkh Baghdād. 141 vols. Ed. Cairo/Baghdad, 1931.Google Scholar
Mub. MuqtMuḥammad cAbd al-Khāliq cUḍayma. = ’Abū l-cAbbās Muḥammad b. Yazīd al-Mubarrad, Al-Muqtaḍab. Ed. by Muḥammad cAbd al-Khāliq cUḍayma. 41 vols. Cairo: Dār al-Taḥrīr, 1965–68.Google Scholar
Nūr al-QabsRudolf Sellheim = [’Abū cUbaydallāh Muḥammad b. cImrān al-Marzubānī], Nūr al-Qabs mukhtaṣar al-Muqtabas li-l-Marzubānī. Ed. by Rudolf Sellheim. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner, 1964.Google Scholar
Qifṭī, ’InbāhMuḥammad ’Abū l-Faḍl ’Ibrāhīm = Jamāl al-Dīn ’Abū l-Ḥasan cAlī b. Yūsuf al-Qifṭī, ’Inbāh al-ruwāt calā ’anbā’ al-nuḥāt. Ed. by Muḥammad ’Abū l-Faḍl ’Ibrāhīm. 31 vols. Cairo, 1950–55.Google Scholar
Quṭrub, ’AḍdādHans Kofler = ’Abū cAlī Muḥammad b. al-Mustanīr Quṭrub, Kitāb al-’aḍdād. Ed. by Hans Kofler (1896–1947). In: Islamica 51 (1931–32) 241–84, 385–461, 493–544.Google Scholar
Quṭrub, ’Azmina = ’Abū cAlī Muḥammad b. al-Mustanīr Quṭrub, Kitāb al-’azmina. In: Majallat al-Majmac al-cIlmī al-cArabī (RAAD) 2 (1922) 33–46.Google Scholar
Quṭrub, FarqRudolf Geyer = ’Abū cAlī Muḥammad b. al-Mustanīr Quṭrub, Kitāb mā khālafa fīhi l-’insān al-bahā’im. Ed. by Rudolf Geyer (1861–1929). In: Sitzungsberichte der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Wien, phil.-hist. Klasse 1151 (1888) 380–391.Google Scholar
Rāzī, Maf. = Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, Mafātīḥ al-ghayb. 81 vols. Ed. Cairo: Al-Maṭbaca al-Bahiyya al-Miṣriyya, 1890–1909.Google Scholar
Sīb. Kit. = ’Abū Bishr cAmr b. cUthmān Sībawayhi, Al-Kitāb. 21 vols. Ed. Būlāq, 1316 A.H. (Repr., Baghdad: Al-Muthannā Library, n.d.).Google Scholar
Sīr. ṬabFritz Krenkow. = ’Abū Sacīd al-Ḥasan b. cAbdallāh al-Sīrāfī, Kitāb ’akhbār al-naḥwiyyīna l-baṣriyyīn. Ed. by Fritz Krenkow (1872–1953). Beyrouth: Imprimerie Catholique, 1936.Google Scholar
Suy. ’AshbāhṬāhā cAbd al-Ra’ūf Sacd = Jalāl al-Dīn ’Abū l-Faḍl cAbd al-Raḥmān al-Suyūṭī, Al-’Ashbāh wa-l-naẓā’ir fī l-naḥw. Ed. by Ṭāhā cAbd al-Ra’ūf Sacd. 21 vols. Cairo: Maktabat al-Kulliyyāt al-’Azhariyya, 1975.Google Scholar
Suy. BughyaMuḥammad ’Abū l-Faḍl ’Ibrāhīm = Jalāl al-Dīn ’Abū l-Faḍl cAbd al-Raḥmān al-Suyūṭī, Bughyat al-wucāt fī ṭabaqāt al-lughawiyyīna wa-l-nuḥāt. Ed. by Muḥammad ’Abū l-Faḍl ’Ibrāhīm. 21 vols. Cairo: Maṭbaca cĪsā al-Ḥalabī, 1964–65.Google Scholar
Suy. Muzh. = Jalāl al-Dīn ’Abū l-Faḍl cAbd al-Raḥmān al-Suyūṭī, Al-Muzhir fī culūm al-lugha. Ed. Cairo: Maṭbacat al-Sacāda, 1325 A.H.Google Scholar
cUkb. MasMuḥammad Khayr al-Ḥalwānī. = ’Abū l-Baqā’ cAbdallāh b. al-Ḥusayn al-cUkbarī, Masā’il khilāfiyya fī l-naḥw. Ed. by Muḥammad Khayr al-Ḥalwānī. Aleppo, n.d.
Yāq. ’IrshādDavid Samuel Margoliouth = ’Abū cAbdallāh Yacqūb Yāqūt al-Rūmī, ’Irshād al-’arīb ’ilā macrifat al-’adīb. Ed. by David Samuel Margoliouth (1858–1940). Second edition. 71 vols. London: Luzac & Co., 1923–31.Google Scholar
Zajj. ’ĪḍMāzin al-Mubārak. = ’Abū l-Qāsim cAbd al-Raḥmān b. ’Isḥāq al-Zajjāji, Al-’Īḍāḥ fī cilal al-naḥw. Ed. by Māzin al-Mubārak. Cairo: Dār al-cUrūba, 1959.Google Scholar
Zajj. LāmMāzin al-Mubārak. = ’Abū l-Qāsim cAbd al-Raḥmān b. ’Isḥāq al-Zajjājī, Kitāb al-lāmāt. Ed. by Māzin al-Mubārak. Damascus: Al-Maṭbaca al-Hāshimiyya, 1969.Google Scholar
Zam. KashMuṣṭafā Ḥusayn ’Aḥmad. = ’Abū l-Qāsim Maḥmūd b. cUmar al-Zamakhsharī, Al-Kashshāf can ḥaqā’iq ghawāmiḍ al-tanzīl. Ed. by Muṣṭafā Ḥusayn ’Aḥmad. 41 vols. Second edition. Cairo: 1373 A.H.Google Scholar
Zam. MufJens Peter Broch. = ’Abū l-Qasim Maḥmūd b. cUmar al-Zamakhsharī, Kitāb al-Mufaṣṣal fī l-naḥw. Second edition. Ed. by Jens Peter Broch (1819–1886). Christiania: Libraria P. T. Mallingii, 1879.Google Scholar
Zub. ṬabMuḥammad ’Abū l-Faḍl ’Ibrāhīm. = ’Abū Bakr Muḥammad b. al-Ḥasan al-Zubaydī, Ṭabaqāt al-naḥwiyyīna wa-l-lughawiyyīn. Ed. by Muḥammad ’Abū l-Faḍl ’Ibrāhīm. Cairo: Maktaba Muḥammad Sāmī ’Amīn al-Khānjī, 1954.Google Scholar
B. Secondary sources
EI(2) = The Encyclopaedia of Islam. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1908–34. (New ed., prepared by a number of leading orientalists, Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1960 --).Google Scholar
Carl BrockelmannGAL = Geschichte der arabischen Literatur, by Carl Brockelmann. 21 Bände. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1943–49. 2nd edition. 3 Supplementbände. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1937–42.Google Scholar
Fuad SezginGAS = Geschichte des arabischen Schrifttums, by Fuad Sezgin. 61 Bände. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1967–78.Google Scholar
Henri FleischTPA = Traité de philologie arabe, by Henri Fleisch. I,II1. Beyrouth: Imprimerie Catholique, 1961, 1979.Google Scholar
Arnaldez, Roger. 1956. Grammaire et théologie chez Ibn Hazm de Cordoue. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Beck, Edmund. 1945. “Der cuṯmānische Kodex in der Koranlesung des zweiten Jahrhunderts”. Orientalia 141.355–73.Google Scholar
Beck, Edmund. 1946. “ cArabiyya, Sunna und cĀmma in der Koranlesung des zweiten Jahrhunderts”. Orientalia 151.180–224.Google Scholar
Ben Milad, Mahjoub. 1967. “Ambiguïté et mathānī coraniques. Pour une théorie générale de la polarité dans la culture arabe”. Berque & Charnay 1967:366–81.Google Scholar
Berque, Jacques, and Jean-Paul Charnay, eds. 1967. L’ambivalence dans la culture arabe. Paris: Editions Anthropos.Google Scholar
Blachère, Régis (1900–1973). 1967. “Origine de la théorie des addād”. Berque & Charnay 1967.397–403.Google Scholar
Bohas, Georges. 1979. Contribution à l’étude de la méthode des grammairiens arabes en morphologie et phonologie d’après des grammairiens ‘tardifs’. Thèse d’état. Univ. de Paris III.Google Scholar
Deichgräber, Karl. 1930. Die griechische Empirikerschule. Berlin: Weidmann. (Repr., Berlin and Zürich: Weidmann, 1965.)Google Scholar
van Ess, Josef. 1966. Die Erkenntnislehre des cAdudaddīn al-Īcī. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner.Google Scholar
van Ess, Josef. 1967. “Ein unbekanntes Fragment des Nazzām”. In: Der Orient in der Forschung. Festschrift für O. Spies, ed. by Wilhelm Hoenerbach, 170–201. Wiesbaden: O. Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
van Ess, Josef. 1970. “The logical structure of Islamic theology”. In: Logic in Classical Islamic Culture, ed. by Gustav E. von Grunebaum, 21–50. Wiesbaden: O. Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Flügel, Gustav (1802–1870). 1862. Die grammatischen Schulen der Araber. Erste Abtheilung. Leipzig: F.A. Brockhaus (Repr., Nendeln: Kraus, 1966.)Google Scholar
Goldziher, Ignaz (1850–1921). 1920. Die Richtungen der islamischen Koranauslegung. Leiden: E.J. Brill. (Repr., 1970.)Google Scholar
Haffner, Auguste (1869–1914), and Louis Cheikho (1859–1927). 1914. Dix anciens traités de philologie arabe. 2ème édition. Beyrouth: Imprimerie Catholique.Google Scholar
Kamal, Ribhi. 1967. “Le tad’ādd”. Berque & Charnay 1967.51–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kofler, Hans (1896–1947). 1931–32. “Das Kitāb al-addād von Abū Muhammad Qutrub ibn al-Mustanīr. Herausgegeben und mit erklärenden Anmerkungen verseilen”. Islamica 51.241–84, 385–461, 493–544.Google Scholar
Leskien, August (1840–1916). 1876. Die Deklination im Slavischen, Litauischen und Germanischen. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus.Google Scholar
Méhiri, Abdelkader. 1973. Les théories grammaticales d’Ibn Jinnī. Tunis: Univ. de Tunis.Google Scholar
Mubārak, Māzin. 1963. Al-Rummānīal-Nahwī fī daw’ sharhihi li-Kitāb Sība-wayh. Damascus: Matbaca Jāmica Dimashq.Google Scholar
Nader, Albert. 1956. Le système philosophique des Muctazila. Beyrouth: Editions ‘Les Lettres Orientales’.Google Scholar
Rabin, Chaim. 1951. Ancient West-Arabian. London: Taylor’s Foreign Press.Google Scholar
Reckendorf, Hermann (1863–1923). 1921. Arabische Syntax. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Silvestre de Sacy, Antoine Isaac (1758–1838). 1829. Anthologie grammaticale arabe. Paris: Imprimerie Royale. (Repr., Osnabrück: Biblio Verlag, 1973.)Google Scholar
Ullmann, Manfred. 1976. “Der Werwolf. Ein griechisches Sagenmotiv in arabischer Verkleidung”. Wiener Zeitschrift zur Kunde des Morgenlandes 681.171–84.Google Scholar
Versteegh, Cornelis H. M. 1977. Greek Elements in Arabic Linguistic Thinking. Leiden: E. J. Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Ewald. 1965. Abū Nuwās: Eine Studie zur arabischen Literatur der frühen cAbbasidenzeit. Wiesbaden: O. Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Weiss, Bernard. 1966. Language in Orthodox Muslim Thought: A Study of ‘Wad’ al-lughah’. Diss., Princeton University.Google Scholar
Wild, Stefan. 1965. Das Kitāb al-cain und die arabische Lexikographie. Wiesbaden: O. Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Wright, William (1830–1889). 1964. A Grammar of the Arabic Language. Third edition revised by W. Robertson Smith and M. J. de Goeje. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Edzard, Lutz
2021. Case-marking in Semitic in the light of the evidence in the Ethiopian language area. In Grammatical and Sociolinguistic Aspects of Ethiopian Languages [IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society, 48], ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.