Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: 23rd Annual Installment
Edited by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren
[Handbook of Pragmatics 23] 2020
► pp. 3–38

Methods in language-attitudes research

| University of Copenhagen
Article outline
  • 1.The contested interest of ‘language attitudes’
  • 2.Language-attitudes as an object of study
    • 2.1Attitudes: Mentalist vs. discursive approaches
    • 2.2Attitudes: Explicit vs. implicit
    • 2.3Language: Which aspects of language can be attitudinal objects?
    • 2.4Language: Which aspects of language to focus on as attitudinal objects?
  • 3.The three methodological approaches of traditional language-attitudes research
  • 4.Analysis of societal treatment
  • 5.Direct methods
    • 5.1Interviewing
      • 5.1.1Structured interviews
      • 5.1.2Unstructured interviews
      • 5.1.3Semi-structured interviews
      • 5.1.4The issue of explicitness/implicitness in discourse data
    • 5.2Recognition and evaluation tasks
      • 5.2.1Mental maps
      • 5.2.2Ranking tasks
      • 5.2.3Self-reports
  • 6.Indirect methods: Speaker evaluation experiments
    • 6.1SEE at the level of variants
    • 6.2SEE at the level of varieties
      • 6.2.1The matched guise technique (MGT) and the verbal guise technique (VGT)
      • 6.2.2The issue of explicitness/implicitness in experimental use of the MGT and VGT
      • 6.2.3SEE in natural, everyday contexts
  • 7.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 November 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.23.met5
References (111)
References
Adams, Z. 2019. “The relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes to British accents in enhancing the persuasiveness of children’s oral health campaigns.” Linguistics Vanguard 5: s1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allport, G. W. 1935. “Attitudes.” In A Handbook of Social Psychology II, ed. by C. Murchison, 798–844. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
Auer, P., B. Barden and B. Grosskopf. 1998. “Subjective and objective parameters determining ‘salience’ in long-term dialect accommodation.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 2 (2): 163–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bishop, H., N. Coupland and P. Garrett. 2005. “Conceptual accent evaluation: Thirty years of accent prejudice in the UK.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 37: 131–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourhis, R. Y. 1984. “Cross-cultural communication in Montreal: Two field studies since Bill 101.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46: 33–48.Google Scholar
Bourhis, R. Y. and H. Giles. 1976. “The language of cooperation in Wales: A field study.” Language Sciences 42: 13–16.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. 1995. Verbal Hygiene. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
2000. Good to talk? Living and Working in a Communication Culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, K. 2012. “The implicit association test and sociolinguistic meaning.” Lingua 122 (7): 753–763. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. “Connecting attitudes and language behavior via implicit sociolinguistic cognition.” In Language (De)standardization in Late Modern Europe: Experimental Studies, ed. by T. Kristiansen and S. Grondelaers, 307–330. Oslo: Novus Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. L. 1975. “Introduction to language attitudes II.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 6: 5–9.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. 2007. Style. Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. “‘Other’ representation.” In Society and Language Use [Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights 7], ed. by J. Jaspers, J.-O. Östman and J. Verschueren, 241–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. and H. Bishop. 2007. “Ideologised values for British accents.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 11 (1): 74–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. and A. Jaworski. 2004. “Sociolinguistic perspectives on metalanguage: Reflexivity, evaluation and ideology.” In Metalanguage. Social and Ideological Perspectives, ed. by A. Jaworski, N. Coupland and D. Galasiński, 15–51. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P. 2012. “Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation.” Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 87–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. “The limits of meaning: Social indexicality, variation, and the cline of interiority.” Language 95 (4): 751–776. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P. and W. Labov. 2017. “Phonetics, phonology and social meaning.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 21 (4): 467–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekberg, L. and J.-O. Östman. 2020. “Identity construction and dialect acquisition among immigrants in rural areas – the case of Swedish-language Finland.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, B. E., E. J. Benson and J. N. Stanford. 2018. “Preface. Prestonian language regard.” In Language Regard. Methods, Variation and Change, ed. by B. E. Evans, E. J. Benson and J. N. Stanford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. 1992. “The appropriacy of “appropriateness”.” In Critical Language Awareness, ed. by N. Fairclough, 33–56. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A. 1972. The Sociology of Language: An Interdisciplinary Social Science Approach to Language in Society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Garrett, P. 2010. Attitudes to Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrett, P., N. Coupland and A. Williams. 2003. Investigating Language Attitudes. Social Meanings of Dialect, Ethnicity and Performance. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Adolescents’ lexical repertoires of peer evaluation: Boring prats and English snobs.” In Metalanguage. Social and Ideological Perspective, ed. by A. Jaworski, N. Coupland and D. Galasiński, 193–225. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, B. and G. V. Bodenhausen. 2006. “Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.” Psychological Bulletin 13 (5): 692–731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, H. 1970. “Evaluative reactions to accents.” Educational Review 22: 211–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, H. and N. Coupland. 1991. Language: Contexts and Consequences. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Giles, H. and P. E. Powesland. 1975. Speech Styles and Social Evaluation. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Giles, H., M. Hewstone, E. B. Ryan and P. Johnson. 1987. “Research on Language Attitudes.” In Sociolinguistics. An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society, ed. by U. Ammon, N. Dittmar and K. J. Mattheier, 585–597. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G. and B. A. Nosek. 2008. “Attitudinal dissociation: What does it mean?” In Attitudes: Insights from the New Implicit Measures, ed. by R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio and P. Briñol, 65–82. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A. and D. Abrams. 1988. Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, J. í Lon. 2012. Ærlig talt, who cares? En sociolingvistisk undersøgelse af holdninger til og brug af importord og afløsningsord i færøsk [Moderne importord i språka i Norden 13]. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Kerswill, P.E. and A. Williams. 2002. “‘Salience’ as an explanatory factor in language change: Evidence from dialect levelling in urban England.”. In Language change: The interplay of internal, external and extra-linguistic factors, ed. by M.C. Jones and, E. Esch, 81–110. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kircher, R. and L. Zipp (eds). forthc. Research Methods in Language Attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kristiansen, T. 1990. Udtalenormering i skolen. Skitse af en ideologisk bastion. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
1991. Sproglige normidealer på Næstvedegnen. Kvantitative sprogholdningsstudier . Ph.D. thesis, University of Copenhagen.
1997. “Language Attitudes in a Danish Cinema.” In Sociolinguistics. A Reader and Coursebook, ed. by N. Coupland and A. Jaworski, 291–305. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
2004. “Social meaning and norm-ideals for speech in a Danish community.” In Metalanguage. Social and Ideological Perspectives, ed. by A. Jaworski, N. Coupland and D. Galasiński, 167–192. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Nordiske sprogholdninger: En masketest [Moderne importord i språka i Norden V]. Oslo: Novus Forlag.Google Scholar
2009. “The macro-level social meanings of late-modern Danish accents.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 41: 167–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. “Conscious and subconscious attitudes towards English Imports in the Nordic countries: Evidence for two levels of language ideology.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 204: 59–95.Google Scholar
2011. “Attitudes, ideology and awareness.” In The SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistics, ed. by R. Wodak, B. Johnston and P. Kerswill, 265–278. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. “Knowing the driving force in language change: Density or subjectivity?” Journal of Sociolinguistics 18 (2): 233–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. “The primary relevance of subconsciously offered attitudes: Focusing the language ideological aspect of sociolinguistic change.” In Responses to Language Varieties. Variability, Processes and Outcomes, ed. by A. Prikhodkine and D. R. Preston, 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. “Language awareness and language change.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language Awarenes, ed. by P. Garrett and J. M. Cots, 387–401. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
forthc. “The theatre-audience method.” In Research Methods in Language Attitudes, ed. by R. Kircher and L. Zipp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kerswill, P. E. and A. Williams. 2002. “‘Salience’ as an explanatory factor in language change: Evidence from dialect levelling in urban England.” In Language change: The interplay of internal, external and extra-linguistic factors, ed. by M. C. Jones and E. Esch, 81–110. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, T. and H. Giles. 1992. “Compliance-gaining as a function of accent: Public requests in varieties of Danish.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 2 (1): 17–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, T. and S. Grondelaers (eds). 2013. Language (De)standardisation in Late Modern Europe: Experimental Studies. Copenhagen: Novus Press.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, T. and L. Vikør (eds). 2006. Nordiske språkhaldningar: Ei meiningsmåling [Moderne importord i språka i Norden IV]. Oslo: Novus Forlag.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, T., M. Maegaard and N. Pharao. 2018. “Sprogideologi i sociolingvistisk forandring.” In Dansk til det 21. århundrede – sprog og samfund, ed. by T. K. Christensen, C. Fogtmann, T. J. Jensen, M. S. Karrebæk, M. Maegaard, N. Pharao and P. Quist, 223–236. Copenhagen:U Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
1972. Sociolingustic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
1984. “Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation.” In Language in Use, ed. by J. Baugh and J. Sherzer, 28–53. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
2001. Principles of Linguistic Change. Social Factors. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. 1967. “The social psychology of bilingualism.” Journal of Social Issues 23: 91–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, W., R. Hodgson, R. Gardner and S. Fillenbaum. 1960. “Evaluational reactions to spoken languages.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60: 44–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LaPiere, R. 1934. “Attitudes versus actions.” Social Forces 13: 230–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosseel, L. and S. Grondelaers (eds). 2019. Linguistics Vanguard 5 (s1). Special Issue: Implicitness and Experimental Methods in Language Variation Research. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maegaard, M. 2005. “Language attitudes, norm and gender. A presentation of the method and results from a language attitudes study.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 37: 55–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maegaard, M., T. J. Jensen, T. Kristiansen and J. N. Jørgensen. 2013. “Diffusion of language change: Accommodation to a moving target.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 17 (1): 3–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mattfolk, L. 2005. “Investigating attitudes to ‘ordinary spoken language’: Reliability and subjective understandings.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 37: 171–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. Attityder till det globala i det lokala. Finlanssvenskar om importord [Moderne importord i språka i Norden 12]. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
McKenzie, R. M. and E. Carrie. 2018. “Implicit-explicit attitudinal discrepancy and the investigation of language attitude change in progress.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 39: 830–844. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, J. L. 1993. Pragmatics. An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, L. 2007. “Off the shelf or under the counter? On the social dynamics of sound changes.” In Managing Chaos: Strategies for Identifying Change in English, ed. by C. M. Cain and G. Russom, 149–172. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. and L. Milroy. 1985. Authority in Language. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niedzielski, N. and D. R. Preston. 1999/2003. Folk Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nyström Höög, C. 2005a. “What do people actually think? On scale measuring and personal narratives in attitude studies.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 37: 193–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005b. Teamwork? Man kan lika gärna samarbeta! Svenska åsikter om importord [Moderne importord i språka i Norden 9]. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Óladóttir, H. 2009. Shake, sjeik eller mjólkurhristingur? Islandske holdninger til engelsk språkpåvirkning [Moderne importord i språka i Norden 11]. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E., G. Suci and P. Tannenbaum. 1957. The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E., W. H. May and M. S. Miron. 1975. Cross-Cultural Universals of Affective Meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Östman, J.-O. 1986. Pragmatics as Implicitness. An analysis of question particles in Solf Swedish, with implications for the study of passive clauses and the language of persuasion . Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
2005. “Persuasion as implicit anchoring. The case of collocations.” In Persuasion across genres. A linguistic approach, ed. by H. Halmari and T. Virtanen, 183–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Östman, J.-O. and J. Thøgersen. 2010. “Language attitudes and the ideology of the Nordic.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 204: 97–127.Google Scholar
Pantos, A. 2015. “Applying the Implicit Association Test to language attitudes research.” In Responses to Language Varieties. Variability, Processes and Outcomes, ed. byA. Prikhodkine and D. R. Preston, 117–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. “Implicitness, automaticity, and consciousness in language attitudes research. Are they related and how do we characterize them?” Linguistics Vanguard 5: s1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, I. L. 2010. “The role of social factors in the shaping of language attitudes – with an evaluation of the concept of life style .” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 204: 129–150.Google Scholar
Pharao, N. and T. Kristiansen. 2019. “Reflections on the relation between direct/indirect methods and explicit/implicit attitudes.” Linguistics Vanguard 5: s1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pharao, N., M. Maegaard, J. S. Møller and T. Kristiansen. 2014. “Indexical meanings of [s+] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts.” Language in Society 43: 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plichta, B. and D. R. Preston. 2005. “The /ay/s have it. The perception of /ay/ as a north-south stereotype in United States English.” Acta Linguistica Hafniencia 37: 107–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, J. and M. Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology. Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Preston, D. R. 1989a. Perceptual Dialectology. Nonlinguists’ Views of Areal Linguistics. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989b. “Standard English spoken here: The geographical loci of linguistic norms.” In Status and Function of Languages and Language Varieties, ed. by U. Ammon, 324–354. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 1999. Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996. “Whaddayaknow? The modes of folklinguistic awareness.” Language Awareness 5: 181–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. “Folk metalanguage.” In Metalanguage. Social and Ideological Perspectives, ed. by A. Jaworski, N. Coupland and D. Galasiński, 75–101. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. “Are you really smart (or stupid, or cute, or ugly, or cool)? Or do you just talk that way?” In Language attitudes, standardization and language change, ed. by M. Maegaard, F. Gregersen, P. Quist and J. N. Jørgensen, 105–129. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
2010. “Variation in language regard.” In Variatio delectat:Empirische Evidenzen und theoretische Passungen sprachlicher Variation, für Klaus J. Mattheier zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. by P. Gilles, J. Scharloth and E. Ziegler, 7–27. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2015. “Does language regard vary?” In Responses to Language Varieties. Variability, Processes and Outcomes, ed. by A. Prikhodkine and D. R. Preston, 3–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. “How to trick respondents into revealing implicit attitudes – talk to them.” Linguistics Vanguard 5: s1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Preston, D. R. & N. Niedzielski. 2013. “Approaches to the study of language regard.” In Language (De)standardisation in Late Modern Europe: Experimental Studies, ed. by T. Kristiansen and S. Grondelaers, 287–306. Oslo: Novus Press.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. 2010. “Speech community.” In Society and Language Use [Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights 7], ed. by J. Jaspers, J.-O. Östman and J. Verschueren, 274–303. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, Y., E. Nadel, R. L. Cooper and R. L. Cooper and J. A. Fishman. 1977. “English on Keren Kayemet Street.” In The Spread of English: The Sociology of English as an Additional Language, ed. by J. A. Fishman, R. L. Cooper and A. W. Conrad, 179–196. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Ryan, E. B. and H. Giles (eds). 1982. Attitudes towards Language Variation. Social and Applied Contexts. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Ryan, E. B., H. Giles and M. Hewstone. 1987. “The measurement of language attitudes.” In Sociolinguistics: An International Handbook of Language and Society, ed. by U. Ammon, N. Dittmar and K. J. Mattheier, 1068–1081. Berlin: De GruyterGoogle Scholar
Ryan, E. B., H. Giles and R. J. Sebastian. 1982. ”An integrative perspective for the study of attitudes toward language variation.” In Attitudes towards Language Variation. Social and Applied Contexts, ed. by E. B. Ryan and H. Giles, 1–19. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. 1981. “The limits of awareness.” Sociolinguistic Working Paper 4. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Soukup, B. 2015. “Mixing methods in the study of language attitudes. Theory and application.” In Responses to Language Varieties. Variability, Processes and Outcomes, ed. by A. Prikhodkine and D. R. Preston, 56–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tamminen-Parre, S. forthc. Livsstilar och individer. En undersökning om språkattityder bland finskspråkiga finländare. Oslo: Novus forlag.
Thøgersen, J. 2005. “The quest for objectivity in the study of subjectivity.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 37: 217–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Det er meget godt som det er. .. er det ikke? En undersøgelse af danskernes holdninger til engelsk [Moderne importord i språka i Norden 10]. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Thøgersen, J. and I. L. Pedersen. 2012. “Lifestyle.” In Handbook of Pragmatics Online. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P. 1972. “Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in urban British English.” Language in Society 1: 179–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1986. Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J. 1987. “Pragmatics as a theory of linguistic adaptation.” Working Document #1. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.
2004. “Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use.” In Metalanguage. Social and Ideological Perspectives, ed. by A. Jaworski, N. Coupland and D. Galasiński, 53–73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zahn, C. J. and R. Hopper. 1985. “Measuring language attitudes: The speech evaluation instrument.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 4: 113–999123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Schleef, Erik
2024. Ruth Kircher and Lena Zipp (eds.), Research methods in language attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. Pp. xix + 409. ISBN 9781108867788.. English Language and Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Buysse, Lieven & Meaghan Blanchard
2022. L1 and non-L1 perceptions of discourse markers in English. Pragmatics & Cognition 29:2 ► pp. 222 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Bilingualism at the Societal and Institutional Levels. In Understanding Bilingualism, Bilinguality, and Bilingual Education in an Era of Globalization [Advances in Religious and Cultural Studies, ], ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Bilinguality. In Understanding Bilingualism, Bilinguality, and Bilingual Education in an Era of Globalization [Advances in Religious and Cultural Studies, ], ► pp. 148 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.