Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 238–249

Computational linguistics

Article outline
  • 1.Delimitation of the field
  • 3.Theoretical foundations
    • 3.1The role of computability
    • 3.2GPSG and LFG
    • 3.3Complex symbols
  • 4.Tools, techniques and levels of description
    • 4.1Deep processing techniques
      • 4.1.1Computational morphology
      • 4.1.2Grammars and parsing
      • 4.1.3PATR
      • 4.1.4Computational semantics
      • 4.1.5Computational pragmatics
    • 4.2Probabilistic techniques in text analysis
  • References
Published online: 3 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.comm2
References (43)
References
Aho, A. D. & J. D. Ullman. 1972. The theory of parsing, translation, and compiling. Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
Alshawi, H. (ed.) 1992. The core language engine. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Asher, N. & A. Lascarides. 1993. A semantics and pragmatics for the pluperfect. Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL: 250–259. Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Y. 1953. A quasi-arithmetical notation for syntactic representation. Language 29. Google Scholar
Barwise, J. & J. Perry. 1983. Situations and attitudes. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Berwick, R. C. & A. Weinberg. 1982. Parsing efficiency, computational complexity and the evaluation of grammatical theories. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 165–191. Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. (ed.) 1982. The mental representation of grammatical relations. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Briscoe, T. & J. Carroll. 1993. Generalised probabilistic LR parsing of natural language (corpora) with unification-based grammars. Computational Linguistics 19: 25–60. Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. & S. Mcconnell-Ginet. 1993. An introduction to semantics. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic structures. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Church, K. W. & R. L. Mercer. 1993. Introduction to the special issue on computational linguistics using large corpora. Computational Linguistics 19: 1–24. Google Scholar
Cohen, P. R. & C. R. Perrault. 1979. Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Science 7: 171–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. 1983. Quantification and syntactic theory. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, D. R. & R. E. Wall & S. Peters. 1981. Introduction to Montague semantics. Reidel. Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. & E. Klein & G. K. Pullum & I. Sag. 1985. Generalised phrase structure grammar. Blackwell. Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. & C. Mellish. 1989. Natural language processing in Prolog. Addison Wesley. Google Scholar
Grosz, B. J. & C. L. Sidner. 1986. Attention, intentions and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12: 175–205. Google Scholar
Grosz, B. J. & K. Sparck-Jones & B. Lynn-Webber (eds.) 1986. Readings in natural language processing. Morgan Kaufmann. Google Scholar
Harman, G. H. 1963. Generative grammars without transformation rules. Language 39. Google Scholar
Heim, I. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite NPs. PhD. Diss., University of Massachussetts, Amherst. Google Scholar
Hindle, D. 1989. Acquiring disambiguation rules from text. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the ACL: 118–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, J. R. 1978. Resolving pronoun references. Lingua 44: 311–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. 1977. X-bar syntax. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Kamp, H. 1981. A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen & M. Stokhof (eds.) Formal methods in the study of language. Reidel. Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. M. 1973. A general syntactic processor. In R. Rustin (ed.) Natural language processing: 193–241. Algorithmics Press. Google Scholar
Kay, M. 1973. The MIND system. In R. Rustin (ed.) Natural language processing: 155–188. Algorithmics Press. Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, K. 1983. Two-level model for morphological analysis. Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence: 683–685. Google Scholar
Montague, R. 1973. The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In J. Hintakka, J. Moravcsik & P. Puppes (eds.) Approaches to natural language: 221–242. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrault, R. C. 1984. On the mathematical properties of linguistic theories. Computational Linguistics 10: 165–176. Google Scholar
Perreira, F. C. N. & D. H. D. Warren. 1980. Definite clause grammars for language analysis. Artificial Intelligence 13: 231–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, P. S. & R. W. Ritchie. 1973. On the generative power of transformational grammar. Information Science 6: 49–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollard, C. & I. Sag. 1987. Information based syntax and semantics, vol. 1. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Ritchie, G. & A. Black & G. Russell & S. Pulman. 1992. Computational morphology. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Sells, P. 1985. Lecture notes on contemporary syntactic theories. CSLI Lecture Notes, Stanford. Google Scholar
Shieber, S. M. 1986. An introduction to unification-based approaches to grammar. CSLI Lecture Notes Stanford. Google Scholar
Sidner, C. L. 1983. Focusing in the comprehension of definite anaphora. In M. Brady & R. C. Berwick (eds.) Computational models of discourse: 267–330. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Tomita, M. 1985. An efficient context-free parsing algorithm for natural languages and its applications. PhD. Diss., Carnegie Mellon University. Google Scholar
Winograd, T. 1973. A procedural model of language understanding. In Schank & Colby (eds.) Computer models of thought and language: 152–186. Freeman. Google Scholar
1983. Language as a cognitive process, vol. 1. Addison Wesley. Google Scholar
Woods, W. 1978. Semantics and quantification in natural language question answering. In Yovits (ed.) Advances in computers vol. 17: 2–64. Academic Press. Google Scholar
Yngve, V. 1967. MT at MIT in 1965. In A. D. Booth (ed.) Machine translation. Mouton. Google Scholar
Zeevat, H. 1989. A compositional approach to discourse representation. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 95–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar