Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 279–294

Conceptual semantics

Article outline
  • 1.Historical background: conceptual semantics as a generative theory
  • 2.Goals of the research
  • 3.Background assumptions
    • 3.1The system nature of mind and language
    • 3.2Modularity of mind: representational modularity
    • 3.3Cognitive constraint
  • 4.Methodological guidelines for conceptual semantics
  • 5.Formalism and technical solutions
    • 5.1Some key terms of representational modularity
    • 5.2Conceptual structure
      • 5.2.1Thematic tier
      • 5.2.2Action tier
      • 5.2.3Temporal tier
      • 5.2.4Semantic field tier
      • 5.2.5Modal tier
    • 5.3Inference rules
    • 5.4Linking
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 3 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.con12
References (38)
References
Carlson, L. A. & Van Der Zee, E. (eds.) 2005. Functional features in language and space: Insights from perception, categorization and development. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic structures. Mouton deGruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press. Google Scholar
. 1970. Remarks on nominalizations. In R. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar: 184–221. Blaisdell. Google Scholar
Croft, W. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C.J. 1968. The case for case. In E. Bach & R. Harms (eds), Universals in Linguistic Theory: 1–88. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. & P. Kay. 1996. Construction grammar. CSLI Lecture Notes 5, Linguistics X 20. University of California at Berkeley. Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., P. Kay & M. C. O’connor. 1988. let alone. Language 64: 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. 1983. The modularity of mind. MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, M. & J.-O. Östman. 2004. Construction grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In M. Fried & J.-O. Östman (eds.), Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective: 11–86. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. MIT Press. Google Scholar
. 1976. Toward an explanatory semantic representation. Linguistic Inquiry 7(1): 89–150. Google Scholar
1978. Grammar as evidence for conceptual structure. In M. Halle J. Bresnan & G. Miller (eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality: 201–228. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1983. Semantics and cognition. MIT Press. Google Scholar
1987. The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 18(3): 369–411. Google Scholar
1990. Semantic structures. MIT Press. Google Scholar
1991. Cognition 41: 9-45. Reprinted in B. Levin & S. Pinker (eds.) 1992. Lexical and conceptual semantics: 9–45.. Blackwell. Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1992. Languages of the Mind. Bradford/MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. The architecture of the linguistic-spatial interface. In P. Bloom M. Peterson, L. Nadel & M. Garrett (eds.), Language and Space: 1–30. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1997. The architecture of the language faculty. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. & P. Culicover. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. & B. Landau. 1991. Spatial language and spatial cognition. In D. J. Napoli & J. Kegl (eds.) Bridges Between Psychology and Language: A Swarthmore Festschrift for Lila Gleitman: 144–169Erlbaum. (Revised version in Jackendoff ,Languages of the Mind.)Google Scholar
Kay, P. 1995. Construction grammar. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman & J. Blommaert (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikanne, U. 1990. Zones and tiers: A study of thematic structure. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura. Studia Fennica Linguistica 35 . Google Scholar
. 1995a. Action tier formation and argument linking. Studia Linguistica 49: 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995b. Interpretive semantics. In J. Verscheuren, J.-O. Östman & J. Blommaert (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual: 338–343. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997a. Lexical conceptual structure and syntactic arguments. SKY 1997 . 81–118.
. 1997b. Suomen infiniittisten adjunktien temporaalinen tulkinta. Virittäjä 3: 338–357. Google Scholar
. 1997c. Locative case adjuncts in Finnish: Notes on syntactico-semantic interface. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 20: 155–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002.Kerrokset ja kytkennät [‘Tiers and links’]: [URL] (Downloaded: 4 May 2008.)
. 2005. Constructions in conceptual semantics. In J.-O. Östman & M. Fried (eds.): 191–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Östman J.-O. & M. Fried (eds.) 2005. Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pörn, M. 2005. Suomen tunnekausatiiviverbit ja niiden lausemaiset täydennykset. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura. Google Scholar
Rummelhart, D. & J. Mcclelland 1986. Parallel distributed processing. MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Der Zee, E. 1996. Spatial knowledge and spatial language. ISOR-Utrecht. Google Scholar
Van Der Zee, E. & U. Nikanne (eds.) 2000. Cognitive interfaces. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Van Der Zee, E. & J. Slack (eds) 2003. Representing direction in language and space. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar