Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 502509
References (44)
References
Becker, A. L. 1979. The figure a sentence makes: An interpretation of a classical Maly sentence. In T. Givón (ed.): 243–260. Google Scholar
Bybee, J. & P. Hopper (eds.) 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., R. Perkins & W. Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Campbell, L. 2001. What’s wrong with grammaticalization? Language Sciences 23: 113–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. L. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & M. Selting (eds.) 2001. Studies in Interactional linguistics. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. W. 1985. Competing Motivations. In J. Haiman (ed.) Iconicity in Syntax: 343–365. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987. The Discourse Basis of Ergativity. Language 63: 805–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001a. Towards a Dialogic Syntax. Ms. University of California, Santa Barbara. Google Scholar
2001b. Discourse and Grammar. In M. Tomasello (ed.) The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Vol. 2: 47–87. L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fox, B. & R. Jasperson. 1995. A Syntactic Exploration of Repair in English Conversation. In P. W. Davis (ed.) Alternative Linguistics: Descriptive and Theoretical Modes: 77–134. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. 1979. From Discourse to Syntax: Grammar as a Processing Strategy. In T. Givón (ed.): 81–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999. Generativity and variation: The notion of ‘Rule of Grammar’ revisited. In B. Macwhinney (ed.) The Emergence of Language: 81–114. Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Givón, T . (ed.) 1979. Discourse and Syntax. Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. 1979. The interactive construction of a sentence in everyday conversation. In G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology: 97–122. Irvington. Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. & M. H. Goodwin. 1987. Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1: 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, J. 1994. Ritualization and the development of language. In W. Pagliuca (ed.) Perspectives on Grammaticalization: 3–28. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., U. Claudi & F. Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Heine, B. & E. Traugott (eds.) Approaches to Grammaticalization. John Benjamins. DOI logo
Helasvuo, M.-L. 2001a. Syntax in the Making. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001b. Emerging syntax for interaction: Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interaction. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (eds.): 25–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(forthcoming) Shared Syntax: The Grammar of Co-Constructions. Santa Barbara Working Papers in Linguistics. University of California.
Hopper, P. J. 1979. Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In T. Givón (ed.): 213–242.Google Scholar
1987. Emergent grammar. Papers of the 13th Annual Meeting, Berkeley Linguistic Society: 139–157. Berkeley Linguistic Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988. Emergent Grammar and the A Priori Grammar Postulate. In D. Tannen (ed.) Linguistics in Context: 117–134. Ablex. Google Scholar
1997. Discourse and the category ‘verb’ in English. Language & Communication 17: 93–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998. Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (ed.) The New Psychology of Language: 155–175. Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & S. A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in Grammar and in Discourse. Language 56: 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J. S. A. Thompson 1984. The Discourse Basis for Lexical Categories in Universal Grammar. Language 60: 703–752. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & E. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. 1987. On the status of SVO sentences in spoken French discourse. In R. Tomlin (ed.) Coherence and Grounding in Discourse: 217–261. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988. Presentational cleft construction in spoken French. In J. Haiman & S. A. Thompson (eds.) Clause combining in grammar and discourse: 135–179. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: A Theory of Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, M. 1991. The role of motivation in the emergence of grammatical categories: the grammaticization of subjects. In B. Heine & E. Traugott (eds.) Vol. II: 159–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ono, T. & S. A. Thompson. 1995. What can conversation tell us about syntax? In P. Davis (ed.) Alternative linguistics: Descriptive and theoretical modes: 213–271. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Östman J.-O. 1981. You know: A Discourse Functional Approach. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. 1979. The Relevance of Repair for Syntax-for-Conversation. In T. Givón (ed.): 261–288. Google Scholar
1996. Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff & S. A. Thompson (eds.) Interaction and Grammar: 52–133. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheibman, J. 2001. Local Patterns of Subjectivity in Person and Verb Type in American English Conversation. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (eds.): 61–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Sorjonen, M.-L. 2001. Responding in Conversation. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. A. & P. J. Hopper. 2001. Transitivity and Clause Structure in Conversation. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (eds.): 27–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. A. & A. Mulac. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In B. Heine & E. Traugott (eds.) Vol. II: 313–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar