Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 756–773

Historical sociolinguistics

Article outline
  • 1.Origins and scope
  • 2.Problems and principles
  • 3.Directions
    • 3.1A historical sociology of language
    • 3.2The historical variationist approach
    • 3.3The ethnographic-interactional dimension: Towards a third wave historical sociolinguistics
  • 4.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 3 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.his4
References (111)
References
Adams, James N. 2013. Social Variation and the Latin Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ammon, Ulrich, Klaus J. Mattheier and Peter H. Nelde (eds.). 1999. Historische Soziolinguistik / Historical sociolinguistics / La linguistique historique (Sociolinguistica 13). Tubingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Auer, Anita, Catharina Peersman, Simon Pickl, Gijsbert Rutten and Rik Vosters. 2015. “Historical sociolinguistics: the field and its future.” Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 1(1): 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Anita, Daniel Schreier and Richard J. Watts (eds.). 2015. Letter Writing and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ayres-Bennett, Wendy. 2001. “Socio-historical linguistics and the history of French.” Journal of French Language Studies, 11: 159–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ayres-Bennet, Wendy. 2004. Sociolinguistic Variation in Seventeenth-Century France. Methodology and Case Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul. 2010. Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Barton, David and Nigel Hall (eds.). 2000. Letter Writing as Social Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baugh, Albert C. and Thomas Cable. 1951. A History of the English Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. 2013. The Guidebook to Sociolinguistics. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bergs, Alexander T. 2005. Social Networks and Historical Sociolinguistics. Studies in Morphosyntactic Variation in the Paston Letters (1421-1503). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “The Uniformitarian Principle and the Risk of Anachronism in Language and Social History.” In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, ed. by Juan M. Hernández-Campoy and J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre, 80–98. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braunmüller, Kurt and Gisella Ferraresi (eds.). 2003. Aspects of Multilingualism in European Language History. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burke, Peter. 1980. Sociology and History. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
. 1992. History and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Languages and Communities in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Toward a Social History of Early Modern Dutch. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cantos, Pascual. 2012. “The Use of Linguistic Corpora for the Study of Language Variation and Change: Types and Computational Applications.” In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, ed. by Juan M. Hernández-Campoy and J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre, 99–122. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conde-Silvestre, J. Camilo. 2007. Sociolingüística histórica. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Diachronic corpora as sources for the study of variation in the history of languages: strengths and weaknesses.” In Creation and Use of Historical English Corpora in Spain, ed. by Nila Vázquez González, 179–203. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Christy, Craig. 1983. Uniformitarianism in Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues. Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
del Valle, José (ed.). 2013. A Political History of Spanish. The Making of a Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
del Valle, José and Luis Gabriel-Stheeman (eds.). 2002. The Battle over Spanish between 1800 and 2000. Language Ideologies and Spanish Intellectuals. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deumert, Ana. 2004. Language Standardization and Language Change. The Dynamics of Cape Dutch. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deumert, Ana and Wim Vandenbussche (eds.). 2003. Germanic Standardizations. Past to Present. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dillard, Joey Lee. 1985. Toward a Social History of American English. Berlin and New York: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dossena, Marina and Susan Fitzmaurice (eds.). 2006. Business and Official Correspondence: Historical Investigations. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dossena, Marina and Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds.). 2008. Studies in Late Modern English Correspondence. Methodology and Data. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Three waves of variation study: the emergence of meaning in the study of variation.” Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 87–100. Also available online at [URL] [Accessed on September, 1, 2015]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Echenique Elizondo, Mª Teresa and Juan Sánchez Méndez. 2005. Las lenguas de un reino. Historia lingüística hispánica. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Elspass, Stephan. 2005. Sprachgeschichte von unten. Untersuchungen zum geschriebenen Alltagsdeutsch im 19. Jahrhundert. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elspass, Stephan, Nils Langer, Joachim Sharloth and Wim Vandenbussche (eds.). 2007. Germanic Language Histories ‘from Below’ (1700–2000). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Mel. 2013. The Language of Queen Elizabeth I: A Sociolinguistic Perspective on Royal Style and Identity. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2002. The Familiar Letter in Early Modern English. A Pragmatic Approach. Amsterdam. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gimeno, Francisco. 1995. Sociolingüística histórica. Siglos X-XII. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
Goossens, Louis. 1995. “Historical Linguistics.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, Manual, ed. by J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman and J. Blommaert, 323–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo [Accessed online on February, 23, 2016]Google Scholar
Hernández-Campoy, Juan M. and Natalie Schilling. 2012. “The Application of the Quantitative Paradigm to Historical Sociolinguistics: Problems with the Generalizability Principle.” In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, ed. by Juan M. Hernández-Campoy and J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre, 63–79. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernández-Campoy, Juan M. and J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.). 2012. The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hüning, Matthias, Ulrike Vogl and Olivier Moliner (eds.). 2012. Standard Languages and Multilingualism in European History. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jahr, Ernst Håkon (ed.). 1999. Language Change. Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janda, Richard D. and Brian D. Joseph. 2003. “On Language, Change, and Language Change – Or, Of History, Linguistics, and Historical Linguistics.” In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ed. by Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda, 3–180. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 2012. “Historical Linguistics and Sociolinguistics: Strange Bedfellows or Natural Friends.” In Language and History, Linguistics and Historiography: Interdisciplinary Approaches, ed. by Nils Langer, Steffan Davies and Vim Wandenbussche, 67–88. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Joseph, John Earl. 1987. Eloquence and Power. The Rise of Language Standards and Standard Languages. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 2006. “Historical Pragmatics.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by J.-O. Östman and J. Verschueren, 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo. [Accessed online on February, 23, 2016]Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., Gerd Fritz and Franz Lebsanft (eds.). 1999. Historical Dialogue Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter and Arthur Mettinger (eds.). 2000. The History of English in a Social Context. Essays in Historical Sociolinguistics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiełkiewicz-Janowiak, Agnieszka. 2002. ‘Women’s Language?’ A Socio-Historical View. Private Writings in Early New England. Poznan: Motivex.Google Scholar
Kopaczyk, Joanna and Andreas H. Jucker (eds.). 2013. Communities of Practice in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kytö, Merja. 1991. Variation and Diachrony, with Early American English in Focus. Studies on can/may and shall/will. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Langer, Nils and Winifred V. Davies (eds.). 2005. Linguistic Purism in the Germanic Languages. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leith, Dick 1983. A Social History of English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lodge, Anthony. 2004. A Sociolinguistic History of Parisian French. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Machan, Tim William and Charles T. Scott (eds.). 1992. English in Its Social Context. Essays in Historical Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mazzon, Gabriella and Luisanna Fodde (eds.). 2012. Historical Perspectives on Forms of English Dialogues. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2002. “Communities of practice.” In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, ed. by Jack K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill and Natalie Schilling-Estes, 526–548. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Millar, Robert McColl. 2010. Authority and Identity: A Sociolinguistic History of Europe before the Modern Age. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012a. English Historical Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012b. “Social History and the Sociology of Language.” In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, ed. by Juan M. Hernández-Campoy and J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre, 41–59. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James. 1992. Linguistic Variation and Change. On the Historical Sociolinguistics of English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, James and Lesley Milory [1985]2012. Authority in Language. Investigating Standard English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moreno Fernández, Francisco 2005. Historia social de las lenguas de España. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Nevala, Minna. 2004. Address in Early English Correspondence. Its Forms and Sociopragmatic Functions. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2006. “Historical sociolinguistics and language change.” In The Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Ans van Kemenade and Bettelou Los, 558–588. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Historical sociolinguistics.” In The Sage Handbook of Sociolinguistics, ed. by Ruth Wodak, Barbara Johnstone and Paul Kerswill, 279–295. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “What are historical sociolinguistics?” Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 1(2): 243–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu and Gijsbert Rutten (eds.) 2012. Comparative Historical Sociolinguistics . Special issue of Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 113(3).Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 1996. Sociolinguistics and Language History. Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
. 2003. Historical Sociolinguistics. Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Longman/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu and Helena Raumoling-Brunberg. 2012. “Historical Sociolinguistics: Origins, Motivations, and Paradigms.” In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, ed. by Juan M. Hernández-Campoy and J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre, 22–40. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg, Jukka Keränen, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi and Minna Palander-Collin, with additional annotation by Ann Taylor. 2006. Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Helsinki: University of Helsinki and York: University of York. Distributed through the Oxford Text Archive.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu and Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen (eds.). 2007. Letter Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nurmi, Arja. 1999. A Social History of Periphrastic Do. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Nurmi, Arja, Minna Nevala and Minna Palander-Collin (eds.). 2009. The Language of Daily Life in England (1400–1800). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pahta, Päivi, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi and Minna Palander-Collin (eds.). 2010. Social Roles and Language Practice in Late Modern English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna. 1999. Grammaticalization and Social Embedding: I think and Methinks in Middle and Early Modern English. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna and Minna Nevala (eds.). 2005. Letters and Letter Writing. Special issue of European Journal of English Studies 9(1).Google Scholar
Penny, Ralph 2000. Variation and Change in Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richter, Michael. 1985. “Towards a Methodology of Historical Sociolinguistics.” Folia Linguistica Historica 6(1): 41–61.Google Scholar
Rindler Schjerve, Rosita. 2003. Diglossia and Power: Language Policies and Practice in the 19th Century Hasburg Empire. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rjéoutski, Vladislav, Gesine Argent and Derek Offord (eds.). 2014. European Francophonie: The Social, Political and Cultural History of an International Prestige Language. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberge, Paul. 2006. “Language history and historical sociolinguistics / Sprachegeschichte und historische soziolinguistik.” In Sociolinguistics: An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society, ed. by Unlrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus J. Mattheier and Peter Trudgill, vol. 3, 2307–2315. Berlin and New York: Mouton De GruyterGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1982. Socio-Historical Linguistics. Its Status and Methodology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1988. “Historical sociolinguistics: Problems and Methodology.” In Sociolinguistics. An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society (2 vols.), ed. by Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar and Klaus L. Mattheier, vol. 2, 1452–1469. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 1995 “Sociolinguistics.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, Manual, ed. by J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman and J. Blommaert, 489–495. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo [Accessed online on February, 23, 2016]Google Scholar
. 2005. “Historical sociolinguistics / Historische soziolinguistik.” In Sociolinguistics/Soziolinguistik: An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society, ed. by Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus J. Mattheier and Peter Trudgill, vol. 2, 1696–1703. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rutten, Gijsbert, Rik Vosters and Wim Vandenbussche (eds.). 2014. Norms and Usage in Language History, 1600-1900. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rutten, Gijsbert and Marijke J. van der Wal (eds.). 2014. Letters as Loot. A Sociolinguistic Approach to Seventeenth and Eighteenth-Century Dutch. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sairio, Anni. 2009. Language and Letters of the Bluestocking Network. Sociolinguistic Issues in Eighteenth-Century Epistolary English. Helsinki: Societé NeophilologiquéGoogle Scholar
Schendl, Herbert and Laura Wright (eds.). 2012. Code-Switching in Early English. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar. 2002. “Investigating Variation and Change in Written Documents.” In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, ed. by Jack K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill and Natalie Schilling-Estes, 67–96. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stenroos, Merja, Martti Mäkinen and Inge Særheim (eds.). 2012. Language Contact and Development around the North Sea Area. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Gunnel Melchers and Päivi Pahta (eds.). 1999. Writing in Nonstandard English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas H. Jucker (eds.). 2003. Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 1987. The Auxiliary Do in Eighteenth Century English. A Sociohistorical Linguistic Approach. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2000. Social Network Analysis and the History of English. Special issue of European Journal of English Studies, 4(3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2008 Grammar, Grammarians and Grammar Writing in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Trotter, David A. (ed.). 2000. Multilingualism in Later Medieval Britain. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2010. Investigations in Sociohistorical Linguistics. Stories of Colonisation and Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuten, Donald N. 2003. Koineization in Medieval Spanish. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuten, Donald N. and Fernando Tejedo-Herrero. 2011. “The relationship between Historical Linguistics and Sociolinguistics.” In The Handbook of Hispanic Sociolinguistics, ed. by Manuel Díaz Campos, 283–302. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Wal, Marijke J. and Gijsbert Rutten (eds.). 2013. Touching the Past. Studies in the Historical Sociolinguistics of Ego-Documents. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandenbussche, Wim and Stephan Elspass (eds.). 2007. Lower Class Language Use in the 19th Century. Special issue of Multilingua . Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 26(2/3).Google Scholar
Walker, Terry 2007. Thou and You in Early Modern English Dialogues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, S. 1994. Macarronic Sermons. Bilingualism and Preaching in Late Medieval England. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov and Marvin I. Herzog. 1968. “Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change.” In Directions for Historical Linguistics, ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel, 95–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Willemyns, Roland and Wim Vandenbussche. 2006. “Historical sociolinguistics: Coming of age?” Sociolinguistica. International Yearbook of European Sociolinguistics 20: 146–165.Google Scholar