Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 795–801

Interactional linguistics

Article outline
  • 1.Background
  • 2.Points of departure
  • 3.Topics
  • 4.Possibilities and challenges
  • References
Published online: 3 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.int11
References (40)
References
Auer, P. 1996. Prosody in conversation. In Couper-Kuhlen E. & M. Selting (eds.) . Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2005. Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25: 7–36. Google Scholar
Chafe, W. & J. Danielewicz. 1987. Properties of spoken and written language. In Horowitz R. & S. J. Samuels (eds.) Comprehending oral and written language: 83–113. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & C. E. Ford. 2004. Sound patterns in interaction. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois J. 2003. Discourse and grammar. In M. Tomasello (ed.) The new psychology of language, vol. 2: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure: 47–87. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ford, C. E. & S. A. Thompson. 1996. Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs et al. (eds.) Interaction and grammar: 134–184. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, C. E., B. A. Fox & S. A. Thompson. 2002a. The language of turn and sequence. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, C. E. B. A. Fox & S. A. Thompson. 2002b. Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In C. E. Ford (eds.). The language of turn and sequence: 14–38. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, B. A. & R. Jasperson. 1995. A syntactic exploration of repair in English conversation. In P. W. Davis (ed.). Alternative linguistics. Descriptive and theoretical modes: 77–134. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. 1981. Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. Academic Press. Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakulinen, A. & M. Selting. 2005. Syntax and lexis in conversation. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J. 1998. Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (ed.). The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure: 155–175. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & S. A. Thompson. 1984. The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language 60: 703–751. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelly, J. & J. Local. 1989. Doing phonology. Manchester University Press. Google Scholar
Lindström, A. 1999. Language as social action. Grammar, prosody, and interaction in Swedish conversation,. Diss. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Lindström, J. 2006. Grammar in the service of interaction: Exploring turn organization in Swedish. Research in Language and Social Interaction 3981–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, P. 2004. On some principles of a dialogical grammar. In K. Aijmer (ed.). Dialogue Analysis VIII. Understanding and misunderstanding in dialogue: 7–23. Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. The written language bias in linguistics. Its nature, origins and transformations. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazeland, H. & M. Huiskes. 2005. Dutch ‘but’ as a sequential conjunction: Its use as a resumption marker. In M. Selting & E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds.) Studies in interactional linguistics: 141–169. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. E. A. Schegloff & S. A. Thompson. 1996. Interaction and grammar. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogden, R., A. Hakulinen & L. Tainio. 2004. Indexing ’no news’ with stylization in Finnish. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & C. E. Ford (eds.) Sound patterns in interaction: 299–334. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Östman, J.-O. 1981. You know. A discourse functional approach. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assesments. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.) Structures of social action: 57–101. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Sacks, H., E. Schegloff & G. Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. 1979. The relevance of repair for syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givon (ed.). Syntax and semantics 12. Discourse and syntax: 261–288. Academic Press.Google Scholar
1996. Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs (eds.) Interaction and grammar: 52–133. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E., G. Jefferson & H. Sacks. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53:361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, B. & E. Ochs (eds.) 1986. Language socialization across cultures. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. The construction of units in conversational talk. Language in Society 29: 477–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, M. & E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds.) 2001. Studies in interactional linguistics. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steensig, J. 2001. Notes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkish conversation. In M. Selting & E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds.)259–286. Studies in interactional linguistics : Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, H. 1999. Turn-taking in Japanese conversation: A study in grammar and interaction. Benjamins. Google Scholar
Tannen, D. 1984. Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Ablex. Google Scholar