Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 1128–1135

Prague school

Article outline
  • 1.Historical overview
  • 2.Main concepts and fields of research
  • 3.Prague functionalism and pragmatics
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 3 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.pra2
References (46)
References
Daneš, F. 1974. Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F. Daneš (ed.) Papers on functional sentence perspective: 106–128. Academia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dokulil, M. & F. Daneš. 1958. K tzv. významové a mluvnické stavbě věty. [On the so-called semantic and grammatical structure of the sentence.] In O vědeckém poznání soudobých jazyků: 231–246. Academia. Google Scholar
Firbas, J. 1957. Some thoughts on the function of word-order in Old English and Modern English. In Sborník prací filosofické fakulty brněnské university A5: 723–100. Google Scholar
1992. Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hajičová, E. 1972. Some remarks on presuppositions. Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics 17: 11–23. Google Scholar
1992. A challenge for universal grammar. XVth International Congress of Linguists, Plenary session texts: 50–61. University Laval. Google Scholar
Havránek, B. 1929. Influence de la fonction de la langue littéraire sur la structure phonologique et grammaticale du tchèque littéraire. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague 1: 106–120. Google Scholar
1932. Úkoly spisovného jazyka a jeho kultura. [The tasks of the Standard language and its culture.]In Spisovná čeština a jazyková kultura. Melantrich. Google Scholar
1938. Zum Problem der Norm in der heutigen Sprachwissenschaft und Sprachkultur. Actes du IVe Congrès international des linguistes: 151–156. Google Scholar
Holenstein, E. 1975. Roman Jakobsons phänomenologischer Strukturalismus. Suhrkamp. Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1929. Remarques sur l’évolution phonologique du russe comparée à celle des autres langues slaves. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague2. Google Scholar
1936. Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague 6: 240–288. Google Scholar
1941. Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Suhrkamp. Google Scholar
1958. Typological studies and their contribution to historical comparative linguistics. Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Linguists: 17–35. Oslo University Pressslo University Press. Google Scholar
1960. Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (ed.) Style in language: 350–377. MIT PressIT Press. Google Scholar
1964. Efforts towards a means-ends model of language in interwar Continental linguistics. In J. Vachek (ed.): 481–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karcevskij, S. 1929. Du dualisme asymétrique du signe linguistique. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague 1: 88–93. Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, J. 1949. Le problème du classement des cas. Biuletyn Polskiego towarzystwa językoznawczego 9: 20–43. Google Scholar
Leška, O. 1991. Phenomenological inspiration of Prague structuralism. Proceedings of Linguistics and Phonetics ‘90: 97–99. Charles University. Google Scholar
Luelsdorff, P., J. Panevová & P. Sgall (eds.) 1994. Praguiana1945–1990. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mathesius, V. 1929. Zur Satzperspektive im modernen Englisch. Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen 155: 202–210. Google Scholar
1939. O tak zvaném aktuálním členění větném. [On information-bearing structure of the sentence.] Slovo a slovesnost 5: 171–174. Google Scholar
1942. Řeč a sloh. [Speech and style.]In B. Havránek & J. Mukařovský (eds.) Čtení o jazyce a poesii: 10–100. Družstevní práce. Google Scholar
Panevová, J. 1974/1975. On verbal frames in functional generative description. Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics 22: 3–40/23: 17–52. Google Scholar
1986. The Czech infinitive in the functions of Objective and the rules of coreference. In J. L. Mey (ed.) Language and discourse: 123–142. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pauliny, E. 1943. Štruktúra slovenského slovesa. [The structure of the Slovak verb.]Bratislava. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petkevič. 1987. A new dependency based specification of underlying representations of sentences. Theoretical Linguistics 14: 143–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sgall, P. 1967. Functional sentence perspective in a generative description. Prague Studies in Mathematical Linguistics 2: 203–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1986. Classical typology and modern linguistics. Folia Linguistica 20: 15–28. Google Scholar
(ed.) 1984. Contributions to functional syntax, semantics, and language comprehension. John Benjamins/Academia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sgall, P., L. Nebeský, A. Goralčĺková & E. Hajičová. 1969. A functional approach to syntax in generative description of language. American Elsevier. Google Scholar
Sgall, P., E. Hajičová & J. Panevová. 1986. The meaning of the sentence in its semantic and pragmatic aspects. Reidel/Academia. Google Scholar
Sgall, P., J. Hronek, A. Stich & J. Horecký. 1992. Variation in language. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, M. 1991. The sense of change. Indiana University Press. Google Scholar
Skalička, V. 1935. Zur ungarischen Grammatik. Charles University. Google Scholar
1962. Das Wesen der Morphologie und der Syntax. Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Slavica Pragensia 4: 123–127. Google Scholar
1979. Typologische Studien. Viehweg. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Šmilauer, V. 1947. Novočeská skladba. [The syntax of Modern Czech.]Mikota. Google Scholar
Tesnière, L. 1959. Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Klincksieck. Google Scholar
Thèses. 1929. Thèses présentées au Premier Congrès des philologues slaves. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague 1: 5–29. Google Scholar
Toman, J. 1991. Prague School in the cultural context. Chicago University Press. Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. 1939. Grundzüge der Phonologie. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague7. Google Scholar
Vachek, J. 1966. The linguistic school of Prague. Indiana University Press. Google Scholar
(ed.) 1964. A Prague School reader in linguistics. Indiana University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1983. Praguiana. John Benjamins/Academia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar