Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 11591170
References (98)
References
Anscombre, J. & O. Ducrot. 1983. L’argumentation dans la langue. Mardaga. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antos, G. 1982. Grundlagen einer Theorie des Formulierens. Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Beaugrande, R. A. & W. U. Dressler. 1981. Introduction to text linguistics. Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Billig, M. 1987. Arguing and thinking. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. 1988. Ethnolinguistics and Kiswahili rhetoric. Working Papers in Kiswahili 3: 1–50.Google Scholar
Bousfield, D. & J. Culpeper (eds.) 2008. Impoliteness: Eclecticism and diaspora. Special Issue of Journal of Politeness Research 4(2). Google Scholar
Braet, A. 1984. De klassieke statusleer in modern perspectief. Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Anscombre, J. & O. Ducrot. 1987. Politeness. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curtius, E. R. 1948. Europäische Literatur und lateinisches Mittelalter. Francke.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T.A . & W. Kintsch. 1983. Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dubois, J. . 1970. Rhétorique générale. Larousse.Google Scholar
Ducrot, O. 1972. Dire et ne pas dire. Hermann.Google Scholar
1980. Les mots du discours. Minuit.Google Scholar
Eco, U. 1972. Einführung in die Semiotik. Fink.Google Scholar
Eggs, E. 1984. Die Rhetorik des Aristoteles. Lang.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F. H. (ed.) 2002. Advances in pragma-dialectics. SicSat/Vale Press.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F. H. & R. Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Foris.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. Argumentation, communication and fallacies. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F. H. & P. Houtlosser (eds.) 2000. The relation between dialectic and rhetoric. Argumentation 14(3) (Special issue).Google Scholar
(eds.) 2006. Perspectives on strategic maneuvering. Special Issue of Argumentation 20(4). Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F. H., R. Grootendorst & F. Snoeck Henkemans. 1996. Fundamentals of argumentation theory. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F. H. , R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair & C. A. Willard (eds.) 1987. Argumentation. Foris.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F.H . & P. Houtlosser (eds.) 1991. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Argumentation. Sic Sat.Google Scholar
Fahnestock, J. 2009. Quid pro nobis. Rhetorical stylistics for argument analysis. In F. H. Van Eemeren (ed.) Examining argumentation in context: 191–220. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freeley, A. J. 1986. Argumentation and debate. Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Galtung, J. 1985. Struktur, kultur und intellektueller Stil. In A. Wierlacher (ed.) Das Fremde und das Eigene: 151–193. Iudicum Verlag.Google Scholar
Garssen, B. 1997. Argumentatieschema’s in pragma-dialectisch perspectief. IFOTT.Google Scholar
Geissner, H. (ed.) 1978. Rhetorik. Bayrischer Schulbuchverlag.Google Scholar
1988. Sprechwissenschaft. Scriptor.Google Scholar
Genette, G. 1972. La rhétorique restreinte. In Figures III: 21–40. Seuil.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. A. 2003. Let’s Talk: Emotion and the Pragma-Dialectic Model. In F. H. Van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, Ch. A. Willard & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds.): Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation: 365–368. SicSat.Google Scholar
Govier, T. 1987. Problems in argument analysis and evaluation. Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: 41–58. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1981. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, 2 vols. Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Haverkamp, A. (ed.) 1983. Theorie der Metapher. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, R. 1989. Argumentation, information and interaction. University of Göteborg.Google Scholar
Hovland, C. I., I. L. Janis & H. H. Kelley. 1957. Communication and persuasion. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1971. Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances. In Selected writings, vol. 2: 239–259. Mouton.Google Scholar
Kibédi-Varga, A. 1970. Rhétorique et littérature. Didier.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, M. 1983. Argumentationsanalyse. Sprachwissenschaftliches Institut Innsbruck.Google Scholar
1992. Alltagslogik. Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
1996. Vernünftig argumentieren. Rowohlt.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1999. Ideologies of politeness. Pragmatics 9(1) (Special issue). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, J. 1987. Die konklusiven Sprechhandlungen. Gunter Narr. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopperschmidt, J. 1976. Allgemeine Rhetorik. Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
1989. Methodik der Argumentationsanalyse. Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1990. Rhetorik, vol. 1. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1991. Rhetorik, vol. 2. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
2000. Argumentationstheorie zur Einführung. Junius.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2006. Die Neue Rhetorik: Studien zu Chaim Perelman. Fink.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. 2002. Metaphor. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koren, R. & R. Amossy (eds.) 2002. Après Perelman: Quelles politiques pour les nouvelles rhétoriques? L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. Don’t Think of an Elephant! Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
Anscombre, J. & O. Ducrot. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, G. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. Longman.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.Google Scholar
De Man, P. 1991. Rhetorik der Tropen. In J. Kopperschmidt (ed.):170–188.Google Scholar
Maneli, M. 1994. Perelman’s new rhetoric as philosophy and methodology for the next century. Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mann, W. C. , C. M. Matthiessen & S. A. Thompson. 1992. Rhetorical structure theory and text analysis. In W. C. Mann & S. A. Thompson (eds.) Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text: 39–78. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M. 1986. De la problématologie. Mardaga.Google Scholar
2010. La problématologie. Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. J. 1974. Rhetoric in the Middle Ages. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Öhlschläger, G. 1979. Linguistische Überlegungen zu einer Theorie der Argumentation. Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’keefe, D. 2002. Persuasion. Sage.Google Scholar
Ortner, H. 2000. Schreiben und denken. Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Pater, W. A. 1965. Les Topiques d’Aristotle et la dialectique platonicienne. St.Paul.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. 2001. Critical applied linguistics. Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perelman, C. 1979. Juridische Logik als Argumentationslehre. Alber.Google Scholar
1980. Das Reich der Rhetorik. Beck.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Perelman, C. & L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1983[1958]. Traité de l’argumentation, la nouvelle rhétorique. Ed. Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Plantin, C. 1998. Les raisons des émotions. In M. Bondi (ed.) Forms of argumentative discourse: 3–50. Clueb.Google Scholar
2005. L’argumentation. Presses universitaires de France. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plett, H. F. 1975. Textwissenschaft und Textanalyse. Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar
2000. Systematische Rhetorik. Fink.Google Scholar
Poyatos, F. 1992. Advances in nonverbal communication. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rapp, Chr. 2002. Aristoteles: Rhetorik. Übs. u. erl. 1. Halbband: Einleitung. Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1975. La métaphore vive. Seuil.Google Scholar
Schanze, H. & J. Kopperschmidt (eds.) 1989. Rhetorik und Philosophie. Fink.Google Scholar
Schmetz, R. 2000. L’argumentation selon Perelman. Presses universitaires de Namur.Google Scholar
Shi-Xu. 2005. A cultural approach to discourse. Palgrave Macmillan.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shotter, J. 1993. Cultural politics of everyday life. Open University Press.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. E. 1958. The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. E., R. Rieke & A. Janik. 1984. An introduction to reasoning. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Trapp, R. (ed.) 1990. The empirical study of argumentation. Argumentation 4(2) (Special issue). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viehweg, T. 1974. Topik und Jurisprudenz. Beck.Google Scholar
Walker, G. B. 1987. Communicating across cultures. In F. Van Eemeren (eds.), vol. 3B: 238–250.Google Scholar
Walton, D. N. 1989. Informal logic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1992. The place of emotion in argument. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
1996. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Walton, D. N., Chr. Reed & F. Macagno. 2008. Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warnick, B. & S. L. Kline. 1992. The new rhetoric’s argument schemes: a rhetorical view of practical reasoning. Argumentation and Advocacy 29: 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. 1999. Emotions across languages and cultures. Cambridge Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. & M. Reisigl. 2001. Discourse and racism. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. E. Hamilton (eds.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis: 372–397. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Related articles: Argumentation theory, Discourse analysis, Figures of speech, Literary pragmatics, Manipulation, Metalinguistic awareness, Narrative, Social psychology, Stylistics.