Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 1171–1180

Role and reference grammar

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Historical background
  • 3.Central concepts
    • 3.1Clause structure
    • 3.2Semantic structure
    • 3.3Focus structure
    • 3.4Grammatical relations and linking
  • 4.Some implications of RRG
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 3 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.rol1
References (35)
References
Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M. & Van Valin, R. D.Jr. 2004. Syntactic templates and linking mechanisms: A new approach to grammatical function asymmetries. Poster presented at 17th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. [available at [URL]].Google Scholar
Dowty, D. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. 1968. The case for case. In E. Bach & R. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory: 1–88. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Foley, W. & R. Van Valin Jr. 1977. On the viability of the notion of ‘subject’ in universal grammar. Proceedings of the 3rd annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 293–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. 1965. Studies in lexical relations. Ph.D. Diss., MIT.Google Scholar
Guest, E. 2008. Parsing for Role and Reference Grammar. In R. Van Valin (ed.), 435–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1976. Toward an explanatory semantic representation. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 89–150.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 1987. A new approach to clause structure in role and reference grammar. Davis Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 55–59.Google Scholar
Kailuweit, R., Staudinger, E., Wiemer, B., & Matasović, R. (eds.) 2008. New Applications of Role and Reference Grammar: Diachrony, Grammaticalization, Romance Languages. Cambridge Scholar Press.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. 1986. Topic, focus and the grammar of spoken French. Ph.D. Diss., University of California.Google Scholar
1987. Sentence focus, information structure, and the thetic-categorial distinction. Proceedings of the 13th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 366–382.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. 1981. Barai clause junctures. Ph.D. Diss., Australian National University.Google Scholar
Rispoli, M. 1991a. The acquisition of verb subcategorization in a functionalist framework. First Language 11: 41–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shimojo, M. 1995. Focus structure and morphosyntax. In Japanese: wa and ga, and word order flexibility. Ph.D. dissertation, SUNY at Buffalo [avaliable at [URL]].Google Scholar
1991b. The mosaic acquisition of grammatical relations. Journal of Child Language 18: 517–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin Jr., R. 1977a. Ergativity and the universality of subjects. Papers from the 13th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: 689–706.Google Scholar
1977b. Aspects of Lakhota syntax. Ph.D. Diss., University of California.Google Scholar
1980. On the distribution of passive and antipassive constructions in universal grammar. Lingua 50: 303–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981. Grammatical relations in ergative languages. Studies in Language 5: 361–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991. Functionalist linguistic theory and language acquisition. First Language 11: 7–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van ValinJr., R. 1992. Extraction restrictions, competing theories and the argument from the poverty of the stimulus. In The reality of linguistic rules. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin Jr., R. 1993a. A synopsis of role and reference grammar. In R. Van Valin (ed.), Advances in role and reference grammar: 1–164. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993b. The interaction of pragmatics and syntax. Paper, Fifth Biennial Symposium of the Department of Linguistics, Rice University.
Van Valin, R. D., Jr. 1998. The acquistions of WH-questions and the mechanisms of language acquistion. In M. Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, 221–249. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Semantic macroroles and language processing. In I. Bornkessel et al. (eds.), Semantic role universals and argument linking: Theoretical, typological and psycholinguistic perspectives, 263–302. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. (ed.) 2008. Investigations of the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, R. D., Jr. & R. J. Lapolla. 1997. Syntax: structure, meaning & function. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van ValinJr., R. & W. Foley. 1980. Role and reference grammar. In E. Moravcsik & J. Wirth (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 13: 329–52. Academic Press.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin Jr., R. & D. Wilkins. 1993. Predicting syntactic structure from semantic representations. In R. Van Valin (ed.), Advances in role and reference grammar: 499–534. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wesit, R. M. 2002. The first language acquistion of tense and aspect: A review. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), Tense-aspect morphology in L2 acquistion, 21–78. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, D. & R. Van Valin Jr. 1993. The case for a case reopened. SUNY Buffalo Center for Cognitive Science Technical Report 93(2).Google Scholar