Cover not available
Part of
Transfer Effects in Multilingual Language Development
Edited by Hagen Peukert
[Hamburg Studies on Linguistic Diversity 4] 2015
► pp. 129–146

Effects of cross-linguistic influence in word formation

A comparative learner-corpus study of advanced interlanguage production

ORCID logo | University of Bremen
In L2 acquisition, knowledge of derivational morphology and the combinatory properties of affixes and bases in the L2 has a positive effect on learners’ receptive and productive vocabulary. This chapter presents a learner-corpus study of affixation in the writing of EFL learners of diverse L1 backgrounds, focusing on various manifestations of cross-linguistic influence (CLI). The data suggest manifold effects of CLI such as overgeneralization and back-formation which predominantly affect non-native affixes and occur in all learner groups irrespective of the L1. However, there are also inter-group differences with Spanish and Italian learners showing comparatively strong interference effects in terms of foreignizing.
Keywords: back-formation, derivation, learner corpus, overgeneralization, word formation
Published online: 29 April 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hsld.4.06cal
References (38)
References
Balteiro, I. 2011. Awareness of L1 and L2 word-formation. Mechanisms for the development of a more autonomous L2 learner. Porta Linguarum 15: 25-34.Google Scholar
Callies, M. & Szczesniak, K. 2007. Investigating productive word formation in advanced L2 acquisition. The potential of learner corpora. Paper presented at the 19th International Conference on Foreign and Second Language Acquisition , 16-19 May 2007, Szczyrk/Poland, <[URL]> (14 November 2013)
Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M. & Silva, R. 2010. Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing. Language Learning 60(1): 21-43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. 1990. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Eckman, F. 1977. Markedness and the Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis. Language Learning 27: 315-330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. 2008. The Study of Second Language Acquisition, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J. 2006. Use of signalling nouns in a learner corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(3): 85-102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foroodi-Nejad, F. & Paradis, J. 2009. Crosslinguistic transfer in the acquisition of compound words in Persian–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12(4): 411-427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González Álvarez, E. 2004. Interlanguage Lexical Innovation. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F. & Paquot, M. 2009. The International Corpus of Learner English, Version 2. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. & Odlin, T. 2000. Morphological type, spatial reference, and language transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22(4): 535-556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S. & Pavlenko, A. 2008. Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jeon, E.H. 2011. Contribution of morphological awareness to second-language reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal 95: 217-235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N., Novokshanova, E., Masuda, K. & Wang, X. 2011. Morphological congruency and the acquisition of L2 morphemes. Language Learning 61(3): 940-967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kellerman, E. 1979. Transfer and non-transfer: Where we are now. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2(1): 37-57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1983. Now you see it, now you don't. In Language Transfer in Language Learning, S.M. Gass & L. Selinker (eds), 112-134. Rowley MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
. 1986. An eye for an eye: Crosslinguistic constraints on the development of the L2 lexicon. In Crosslinguistic Influence in Second Language Acquisition, E. Kellerman & M. Sharwood-Smith (eds), 37-57. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E. & Sharwood-Smith, M. (eds). 1986. Crosslinguistic Influence in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Lessard, G. & Levison, M. 2001. Lexical creativity in L2 French. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRALJ) 39: 245-257.Google Scholar
Lowie, W. 2005. Exploring a second language: The discovery of morphological productivity. In EUROSLA Yearbook, Vol. 5, S.H. Foster-Cohen, M.P. García-Mayo & J. Cenoz (eds), 251-268. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mochizuki, M. & Aizawa, K. 2000. An affix acquisition order for EFL learners: An exploratory study. System 28: 291-304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morin, R. 2003. Derivational morphology analysis as a strategy for vocabulary acquisition in Spanish. The Modern Language Journal 87: 200-221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicoladis, E. 1999. Where is my brush-teeth? Acquisition of compound nouns in a bilingual child. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2(3): 245-256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. What’s the difference between “toilet paper” and “paper toilet”? French-English bilingual children’s crosslinguistic transfer in compound nouns. Journal of Child Language 29(4): 843-863. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Crosslinguistic transfer in deverbal compounds of preschool children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 6(1): 17-31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Odlin, T. 1989. Language Transfer. Cross-Linguistic Influence in Language Learning. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olshtain, E. 1987. The acquisition of new word formation processes in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 9: 221-232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onysko, A. Forthcoming. Crosslinguistic influence on headedness of novel English compounds: Evidence from bilingual speakers of Te Reo Māori and English. STUF - Language Typology and Universals.
Plag, I. 2003. Word-formation in English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Creoles as interlanguages: Word-formation. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 24(2): 339-362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramirez, G., Chen, X., Geva, E. & Kiefer, H. 2010. Morphological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners: Within and cross-language effects on word reading. Reading and Writing 23(3-4): 337-358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E. & Geva, E. 2008. Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English-Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing 21(5): 481-504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N. & Meara, P. 1997. Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge framework - Word associations and verbal suffixes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19: 17-36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N. & Zimmerman, C. 2002. Derivative word forms: What do learners know? TESOL Quarterly 36(2): 145-171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L. 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics 10: 209-230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, D. 2013. Linguistic distance effect of cross-linguistic transfer of morphological awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics 34: 917-942. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, R. 2002. Advanced foreign language vocabulary - A closer look at word formation and idioms. In Time for Words. Studies in Foreign Language Acquistion, J. Arabski (ed.), 83-95. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Menut, Amélie, Marc Brysbaert & Séverine Casalis
2023. Derivational awareness in late bilinguals increases along with proficiency without a clear influence of the suffixes shared with L1. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 26:1 ► pp. 138 ff. DOI logo
Callies, Marcus
2016. Towards a process-oriented approach to comparing EFL and ESL varieties. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2 ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.