Part of
Foreign Language Education in Multilingual Classrooms
Edited by Andreas Bonnet and Peter Siemund
[Hamburg Studies on Linguistic Diversity 7] 2018
► pp. 381405
Bardel, C. & Falk, Y.
2007The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research 23(4): 459–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bui, L. T.
2014Vietnamese Demonstratives: A Spatially-based Polysemy Network. PhD dissertation, University of Queensland.
De Angelis, G.
2007Third or Additional Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Diessel, H.
1999The morphosyntax of demonstratives in synchrony and diachrony. Linguistic Typology 3: 1–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Is there a deictic frame of reference? In Space in Language and Linguistics: Geographical, Interactional, and Cognitive Perspectives, P. Auer, M. Hilpert, A. Stuckenbrock & B. Szmrecsanyi (eds), 687–692. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Falk, Y. & Bardel, C.
2010The study of the role of the background languages in third language acquisition. The state of the art. IRAL 48: 185–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Object pronouns in German L3 syntax. Evidence for the L2 status factor. Second Language Research 27(1): 59–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flynn, S., Foley, C. & Vinnitskaya, I.
2004The Cumulative-Enhancement Model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism 1(1): 3–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagarina, N., Klop, D., Kunnari, S., Tantele, K., Välimaa, T., Balciuniene, I., Bohnacker, U. & Walters, J.
2012MAIN – Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 56.Google Scholar
Gogolin, I., Siemund, P., Schulz, M. & Davydova, J.
2013Multilingualism, language contact, and urban areas. An introduction. In Multilingualism and Language Contact in Urban Areas. Acquisition – Identities – Space – Education [Hamburg Studies on Linguistic Diverstiy 1], P. Siemund, I. Gogolin, M. Schulz & J. Davydova (eds), 1–15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Göksel, A. & Kerslake, C.
2005Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. New York NY: Rouledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammarberg, B.
2001Roles of L1 and L2 in L3 production and acquisition. In Cross-linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition: Psychological Perspectives. J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, U. Jessner (eds), 21–42. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Herdina, P. & Jessner, U.
2002A Dynamic Model of Multilingualism. Perspectives of Changes Psycholinguistics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C.
2003Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. K.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hufeisen, B.
1998: L3: Stand der Forschung: Was bleibt zu tun? (L3: Status of current research: what remains to be done?) . In Tertiärsprachen: Theorien, Modelle, Methoden, B. Hufeisen & B. Lindemann (eds), 169–184. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Johanson, L.
2002Structural Factors in Turkic Language Contacts. London: Curzon.Google Scholar
Kerslake, C.
1999Alternative subordination strategies in Turkish. In Connectivity in Grammar and Discourse [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 5], J. Rehbein, C. Hohenstein & L. Pietsch (eds), 231–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Küntay, A. & Özyürek, A.
2006Learning to use demonstratives in conversation: What do language specific strategies in Turkish reveal? Journal of Child Language 33(2): 303–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maltzoff, N.
1994Essentials of Russian Grammar. A Complete Guide for Students and Professionals. Lincolnwood IL: Passport Books/National Textbook Company.Google Scholar
Matras, Y.
2009Language Contact. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nguyễn, P. P.
1992Vietnamese demonstratives revisited. The Mon-Khmer Studies Journal 20: 127–136.Google Scholar
Ohser, E.
2000Vater und Sohn, Band 2. Konstanz: Südverlag.Google Scholar
Peukert, H.
2015Transfer effects in multilingual language development. In Transfer Effects in Multilingual Language Development [Hamburg Studies on Linguistic Diversity 4], H. Peukert (ed.), 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M.
1984Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Languages Acquisition 6(2): 186–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory [Studies in Bilingualism 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pohlmann-Rother, S., Schoreit, E. & Kürzinger, A.
2016Schreibkompetenzen von Erstklässlern quantitativ-empirisch erfassen – Herausforderungen und Zugewinn eines analytisch-kriterialen Vorgehens gegenüber einer holistischen Bewertung. Journal for Educational Research Online 8(2): 107–135. URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-124293Google Scholar
Reich, H., Roth H. -J. & Döll M.
2009Fast catch bumerang. deutsche Sprachversion. In Auswertungsbögen und Auswertungshinweise [FÖRMIG Edition Band 5], D. Lengyel, H. H. Reich, H. J. Roth & M. Döll (eds), 209–241. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Rothman, J.
2011L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy. The typological primacy model. Second Language Research 27(2): 107–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J. & Cabrelli Amaro, J.
2010What variables condition syntactic transfer? A look at the L3 initial state. Second Language Research 26(2): 189–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. & Sprouse, Rex A.
1996L2 cognitive status and the Full Transfer/Full Access Model. Second Language Research 12(1): 40–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siemund, P.
2008Language contact: Constraints and common paths of contact induced change. In Language Contact and Contact Languages [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 7], P. Siemund & N. Kintana (eds), 3–11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Englisch als weitere Sprache im Kontext herkunftsbedingter Mehrsprachigkeit. In Sprachentwicklung im Kontext von Mehrsprachigkeit – Hypothesen, Methoden, Forschungsperspektiven, J. Duarte, I. Gogolin, T. Klinger, B. Schnoor & M. Trebbels (eds). Wiesdaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
Tauscher, E. & Kirschbaum, E. -G.
1974Grammatik der russischen Sprache, 10th edn. Düsseldorf: Brücken-Verlag.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G.
2001Language Contact: An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, L. C.
1965A Vietnamese Grammar. Seattle WA: The University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., Rodina, Y.
2016Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. International Journal of Bilingualism 21(6): 666–682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
William, S. & Hammarberg, B.
1998Languages switches in L3 production: Implication for a Polyglot Speaking Model. Applied Linguistics 19(3): 295–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Lorenz, Eliane, Kathrin Feindt, Sharareh Rahbari & Peter Siemund
2022. The Influence of Extralinguistic Variables on Cross-Linguistic Influence in Contexts of Bilingual Heritage Speakers: A Summary of Topical Research Findings. In Language Development in Diverse Settings [Edition ZfE, 11],  pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
Rothman, Jason, Jorge González Alonso & Eloi Puig-Mayenco
2019. Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer, DOI logo
Siemund, Peter
2018. Modeling World Englishes from a cross-linguistic perspective. In Modeling World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G61],  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Siemund, Peter & Eliane Lorenz
2024. Chapter 5. Multilingual advantages. In Multifaceted Multilingualism [Studies in Bilingualism, 66],  pp. 123 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.