Part of
Handbook of Translation Studies: Volume 5
Edited by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer
[Handbook of Translation Studies 5] 2021
► pp. 151157
References
Bühler, Hildegund
1985 “Conference interpreting ‒ a multichannel communication phenomenon.” Meta 30 (1): 49–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chmiel, Agnieszka, Przemysław Janikowski, and Agnieszka Lijewska
Davitti, Elena
2019 “Methodological explorations of interpreter-mediated interaction: Novel insights from multimodal analysis.” Qualitative Research 19 (1): 7–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davitti, Elena, and Sergio Pasquandrea
2017 “Embodied participation: What multimodal analysis can tell us about interpreter-mediated encounters in pedagogical settings.” Journal of Pragmatics 107: 105–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herbert, Jean
1952The Interpreter’s Handbook: How to Become a Conference Interpreter. Geneva: Georg.Google Scholar
Kaindl, Klaus
2020 “A theoretical framework for a multimodal conception of translation.” In Translation and Multimodality: Beyond Words, ed. by Monica Boria, Ángeles Carreres, María Noriega-Sánchez, and Marcus Tomalin, 49–70. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kirchhoff, Hella
1976 “Das dreigliedrige, zweisprachige Kommunikationssystem Dolmetschen.” Le langage et l’homme 31: 21–27.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen
2001Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Krystallidou, Demi
Pasquandrea, Sergio
Co-constructing dyadic sequences in healthcare interpreting: A multimodal account.” New Voices in Translation Studies 8: 132–157.
Poyatos, Fernando
1983 “Language and nonverbal systems in the structure of face-to-face interaction.” Language & Communication 3 (2): 129–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987/2002 “Nonverbal communication in simultaneous and consecutive interpretation: A theoretical model and new perspectives.” In The Interpreting Studies Reader, ed. by Franz Pöchhacker, and Miriam Shlesinger, 235–246. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Seeber, Kilian G.
2012 “Multimodal input in simultaneous interpreting: An eye-tracking experiment.” In Translation Studies: Old and New Types of Translation in Theory and Practice, ed. by Lew N. Zybatow, Alena Petrova, and Michael Ustaszewski, 341–347. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Shlesinger, Miriam
1994 “Intonation in the production and perception of simultaneous interpretation.” In Bridging the Gap: Empirical Research in Simultaneous Interpretation, ed. by Sylvie Lambert, and Barbara Moser-Mercer, 225–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vranjes, Jelena, Hanneke Bot, Kurt Feyaerts, and Geert Brône

Further essential reading

Pöchhacker, Franz
2020 “ ‘Going video’: Mediality and multimodality in interpreting.” In Linking Up with Video: Perspectives on Interpreting Practice and Research, ed. by Heidi Salaets, and Geert Brône, 13–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Capus, Nadja & Ivana Havelka
2022. Interpreting Intercepted Communication: A Sui Generis Translational Activity. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 35:5  pp. 1817 ff. DOI logo
Gao, Fei
2023. Getting the message in ‘Sound’ across at conference interpreting: a case study on rendering prosodic emphasis. Perspectives 31:6  pp. 1033 ff. DOI logo
Pöchhacker, Franz
2023. Re-interpreting interpreting. Translation Studies 16:2  pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Yuan, Lu & Binhua Wang
2023. Cognitive processing of the extra visual layer of live captioning in simultaneous interpreting. Triangulation of eye-tracked process and performance data. Ampersand 11  pp. 100131 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.